On Dec 9, 2012, at 09:09, Rainer Müller wrote:
> This is especially a problem as other ports implement a different way to
> select the version for modules/libraries. For python, the default for
> py-foo is always py24-foo.
Actually, the default is py24-foo only if "24" is in python.versions.
Ot
On 09/dic/2012, at 16:09, Rainer Müller wrote:
> On 2012-12-09 05:12, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> On Dec 8, 2012, at 17:53, Joshua Root wrote:
>>> With the unified portgroup there's almost no extra effort involved
>>> in having them. I don't think there's any reason to drop them
>>> until upstream doe
On 2012-12-09 05:12, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Dec 8, 2012, at 17:53, Joshua Root wrote:
>> With the unified portgroup there's almost no extra effort involved
>> in having them. I don't think there's any reason to drop them
>> until upstream does.
>
> Users unfamiliar with the intricacies of the py
On Dec 8, 2012, at 17:53, Joshua Root wrote:
> On 2012-12-9 10:31 , Aljaž Srebrnič wrote:
>> I'd like to know what's the policy with maintaining py2[4-6]- ports…
>> Shouldn't we gradually drop support for older python versions?
>
> With the unified portgroup there's almost no extra effort involve
On 2012-12-9 13:44 , Ned Deily wrote:
> Certainly it's up to any project to determine what they want to support.
> Keep in mind, though, that the older releases, like 2.4.x and 2.5.x,
> were retired or in security-fix-only mode prior to the release of
> current OS X and Xcode versions, so the l
In article <44c1f45b-f327-4721-910a-bfac53194...@orcaware.com>,
Blair Zajac wrote:
> On Dec 8, 2012, at 5:52 PM, Ned Deily wrote:
> > WRT Python itself: Python 2.4.x and 2.5.x are no longer supported in any
> > way by the PSF Python project (www.python.org). Python 2.6.x is in
> > security-fix
On Dec 8, 2012, at 5:52 PM, Ned Deily wrote:
> In article <50c3d30a.2080...@macports.org>,
> Joshua Root wrote:
>
>> On 2012-12-9 10:31 , Aljaž Srebrnič wrote:
>>> Hello list!
>>> I'd like to know what's the policy with maintaining py2[4-6]- ports…
>>> Shouldn't we gradually drop support for ol
In article <50c3d30a.2080...@macports.org>,
Joshua Root wrote:
> On 2012-12-9 10:31 , Aljaž Srebrnič wrote:
> > Hello list!
> > I'd like to know what's the policy with maintaining py2[4-6]- ports…
> > Shouldn't we gradually drop support for older python versions?
>
> With the unified portgroup
On 2012-12-9 10:31 , Aljaž Srebrnič wrote:
> Hello list!
> I'd like to know what's the policy with maintaining py2[4-6]- ports…
> Shouldn't we gradually drop support for older python versions?
With the unified portgroup there's almost no extra effort involved in
having them. I don't think there's
