Dear David,
Thank you for letting me know.
OK, let’s wait a few days to see if we need gsl116 or not.
Regards,
Takeshi
-
Takeshi Enomoto
take...@macports.org
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
Hi,
It seems that the update to gsl-2.x broke fgsl (#50295), which is compatible
with 1.16.
We may need gsl116 until the updates are provided by the upstream.
Regards,
Takeshi
-
Takeshi Enomoto
take...@macports.org
___
macports-dev mailing list
On 1/13/16 5:48 AM, Takeshi Enomoto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems that the update to gsl-2.x broke fgsl (#50295), which is compatible
> with 1.16.
> We may need gsl116 until the updates are provided by the upstream.
>
> Regards,
>
> Takeshi
>
> -
> Takeshi Enomoto
> take...@macports.org
>
>
On 12/15/15 6:52 AM, petr wrote:
>
> The update to gsl @2.1 seems to have broken binary compatibility with
> dependent ports. So they need to be revision bumped. I see this for `nco` and
> `qgis` but there are very probably more. See below.
>
> ~petr
>
>
> {{{
> [...]
> ---> Installing gsl
The update to gsl @2.1 seems to have broken binary compatibility with dependent
ports. So they need to be revision bumped. I see this for `nco` and `qgis` but
there are very probably more. See below.
~petr
{{{
[...]
---> Installing gsl @2.1_0
---> Cleaning gsl
---> Removing work