Re: suggestion for package website

2009-03-24 Thread Rainer Müller
C. Florian Ebeling wrote: >> Sure, there's all kinds of stuff like that that we could do with a >> working MPWA/db.macports.org. > > What's the status of this thing anyway? It is on our ideas list for Google Summer of Code this year again, as it already was last year, but the project failed on th

Re: suggestion for package website

2009-03-24 Thread C. Florian Ebeling
> Sure, there's all kinds of stuff like that that we could do with a > working MPWA/db.macports.org. What's the status of this thing anyway? -- Florian Ebeling Twitter: febeling florian.ebel...@gmail.com ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@li

Re: suggestion for package website

2009-03-24 Thread Joshua Root
Jeremy Lavergne wrote: > I was perusing Arch's website today and noticed there's a "flag package > out-of-date" link when you're viewing information about a package. Is > this something we might find worthwhile for MacPorts since not > everything has a livecheck? > > I presume it can put a commun

Re: suggestion for package website

2009-03-24 Thread Emmanuel Hainry
Citando Jeremy Lavergne : > I was perusing Arch's website today and noticed there's a "flag package > out-of-date" link when you're viewing information about a package. Is > this something we might find worthwhile for MacPorts since not everything > has a livecheck? > > I presume it can put a c

suggestion for package website

2009-03-24 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
I was perusing Arch's website today and noticed there's a "flag package out-of-date" link when you're viewing information about a package. Is this something we might find worthwhile for MacPorts since not everything has a livecheck? I presume it can put a community-initiated flag of "might