(re-sent from correct sender address for the list)
Hi René,
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 05:40:30PM +0100, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> On Tuesday December 15 2015 10:17:58 Daniel J. Luke wrote:
>
> > Anything is possible, although this seems like a bad idea to me.
>
> I agree it could lead to lots of
On Tuesday December 15 2015 10:17:58 Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> Anything is possible, although this seems like a bad idea to me.
I agree it could lead to lots of problems when wielded in the wrong hands (so
it might be better to use a dedicated utility rather than the port command
itself).
> Mayb
On Dec 15, 2015, at 7:39 AM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> Would it be possible to implement a mechanism allowing this, so that one
> could use something along the lines of
>
> %> port execute foo.tcl
>
> and, by extension, put `#!/usr/bin/env port execute` in the file's 1st line?
Anything is pos
Hi,
As a port maintainer it happens that I need to act on data (that I normally [=
in Portfiles] obtain through procedures and/or a PortGroup) outside of the
regular port configure/build/etc phases. This happens most often when I need to
update a series of (sub)ports, like at the moment (KF5 Fr
