Re: [77027] trunk/dports/python

2011-03-18 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 18, 2011, at 03:00, j...@macports.org wrote: > Revision: 77027 > http://trac.macports.org/changeset/77027 > Author: j...@macports.org > Date: 2011-03-18 01:00:46 -0700 (Fri, 18 Mar 2011) > Log Message: > --- > py-macholib, py-py2app-devel: adjust deps to avoid trying

Re: [77027] trunk/dports/python

2011-03-18 Thread Joshua Root
On 2011-3-18 19:04 , Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Mar 18, 2011, at 03:00, j...@macports.org wrote: > >> Revision: 77027 >> http://trac.macports.org/changeset/77027 >> Author: j...@macports.org >> Date: 2011-03-18 01:00:46 -0700 (Fri, 18 Mar 2011) >> Log Message: >> --- >> py-

Re: Use configure.ldflags-delete instead of configure.ldflags?

2011-03-18 Thread Anders F Björklund
Ryan Schmidt wrote: and 'ldflags' should (imho) be safe for a port to simply reset. This seems demonstrative of the problems that can emerge with base implicitly setting environmental variables and other build-time arguments; it's much harder to control them directly from a

Re: Use configure.ldflags-delete instead of configure.ldflags?

2011-03-18 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 18, 2011, at 03:41, Anders F Björklund wrote: > Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > and 'ldflags' should (imho) be safe for a port to simply reset. This > seems demonstrative of the problems that can emerge with base implicitly > setting environmental variables and other build-time argum

Re: Use configure.ldflags-delete instead of configure.ldflags?

2011-03-18 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 16, 2011, at 04:47, Rainer Müller wrote: > On 03/15/2011 02:13 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >>> How about the addition of "-Xlinker -headerpad_max_install_names" as a >>> default in portconfigure.tcl? Would macport consider it? >> >> We could consider that. I wonder if there are any negative i

Re: Use configure.ldflags-delete instead of configure.ldflags?

2011-03-18 Thread Anders F Björklund
Ryan Schmidt wrote: > We may not particularly support what this user is doing, but we may very well > want to support doing this when we start building and distributing binary > packages, so that they could be relocated to whatever prefix the user > installed MacPorts to. If you are planning t

Re: Use configure.ldflags-delete instead of configure.ldflags?

2011-03-18 Thread Anders F Björklund
Ryan Schmidt wrote: > On Mar 16, 2011, at 04:47, Rainer Müller wrote: > >> On 03/15/2011 02:13 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: How about the addition of "-Xlinker -headerpad_max_install_names" as a default in portconfigure.tcl? Would macport consider it? >>> >>> We could consider that. I wonde

Re: Use configure.ldflags-delete instead of configure.ldflags?

2011-03-18 Thread Daniel J. Luke
On Mar 18, 2011, at 4:57 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> and 'ldflags' should (imho) be safe for a port to simply reset. This >> seems demonstrative of the problems that can emerge with base implicitly >> setting environmental variables and other build-time arguments; it's >> much

Re: Use configure.ldflags-delete instead of configure.ldflags?

2011-03-18 Thread Rainer Müller
On 03/18/2011 09:58 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > Can you give an example of a library that would not be relocatable? As Anders already said, anything that uses data files from ${prefix}/share or ${prefix}/etc and has these paths hardcoded for this purpose. Rainer

Re: Use configure.ldflags-delete instead of configure.ldflags?

2011-03-18 Thread Anders F Björklund
Rainer Müller wrote: > On 03/18/2011 09:58 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> Can you give an example of a library that would not be relocatable? > > As Anders already said, anything that uses data files from > ${prefix}/share or ${prefix}/etc and has these paths hardcoded for this > purpose. And that's

Re: Use configure.ldflags-delete instead of configure.ldflags?

2011-03-18 Thread Jeff Johnson
On Mar 18, 2011, at 11:15 AM, Anders F Björklund wrote: > Rainer Müller wrote: > >> On 03/18/2011 09:58 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >>> Can you give an example of a library that would not be relocatable? >> >> As Anders already said, anything that uses data files from >> ${prefix}/share or ${prefix

Devtools opensource release

2011-03-18 Thread Daniel J. Luke
http://opensource.apple.com/release/developer-tools-40/ so ... do we build/ship our own set of tools? (it would be a bunch of new/extra work, but we could at least fix the /usr/local problem) -- Daniel J. Luke +

Re: Devtools opensource release

2011-03-18 Thread Rainer Müller
On 03/18/2011 04:40 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote: > http://opensource.apple.com/release/developer-tools-40/ > > so ... do we build/ship our own set of tools? As far as I can see this does not include any system headers which is a showstopper. Rainer ___ ma

Re: Devtools opensource release

2011-03-18 Thread Daniel J. Luke
On Mar 18, 2011, at 12:05 PM, Rainer Müller wrote: > > On 03/18/2011 04:40 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote: >> http://opensource.apple.com/release/developer-tools-40/ >> >> so ... do we build/ship our own set of tools? > > As far as I can see this does not include any system headers which is a > showst

Re: Devtools opensource release

2011-03-18 Thread William Siegrist
On Mar 18, 2011, at 9:05 AM, Rainer Müller wrote: > On 03/18/2011 04:40 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote: >> http://opensource.apple.com/release/developer-tools-40/ >> >> so ... do we build/ship our own set of tools? > > As far as I can see this does not include any system headers which is a > showstop

Re: Devtools opensource release

2011-03-18 Thread Mark Anderson
Also, do the raw system frameworks include the headers? I don't have a un-developer-tooled machine to look. We could always resort to class-dump. :-) Mark On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 12:45 PM, William Siegrist wrote: > > On Mar 18, 2011, at 9:05 AM, Rainer Müller wrote: > > > On 03/18/2011 04:40 P

Re: Abandoned port [nbsmtp]

2011-03-18 Thread Andrea D'Amore
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 12:18 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > I'm not familiar with the software. I think very few are, I was checking a quick way to test a SMTP server. > If you can find an updated version of nbsmtp and can update the port to that > version, great. So I did in r77052. > If not, an

Google Summer of Code 2011: MacPorts has been accepted

2011-03-18 Thread Rainer Müller
Hello, this is just a quick announcement that MacPorts once again has been accepted into the Google Summer of Code program. If you are not already familiar with this: Google pays students to work on various Open Source projects over the summer. It is also a good start for students with Open Source

darwin/10.7.1

2011-03-18 Thread Takeshi Enomoto
Hi, A user reported a problem in building g95 but I could not reproduce the problem (#28782). His main.log indicates that he uses a new kernel probably shipped with new Mac Book Pro (Thunderbolt). :debug:main OS darwin/10.7.1 (Mac OS X 10.6) arch i386 I could fix Portfile by detecting 10.7.x

Re: Bumping other py*-lint when bumping py26-lint

2011-03-18 Thread Blair Zajac
On Mar 15, 2011, at 11:37 AM, Joshua Root wrote: On 2011-3-16 04:17 , Blair Zajac wrote: PS Is there a list of macport logins and real names, so we don't have to say "Hey you" :) ? Thanks! Blair _