Yes, I would include as much of
https://github.com/erikd/libsndfile/commit/170a10ab8d4e6e395e68ee258edb077e80c1215d
as is relevant to fix this issue (i.e. not the part that changes the version
number). You'll then need to "use_autoreconf yes" too, since the patch modify
configure.ac and configu
Ryan Schmidt writes:
>> On Apr 25, 2017, at 15:21, Sean Farley wrote:
>>
>> Sean Farley (seanfarley) pushed a commit to branch master
>> in repository macports-ports.
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/commit/ff1f457e8fc9ad431f2d1b77b13e32243209b96d
>>
>> The following commi
> On Apr 25, 2017, at 15:21, Sean Farley wrote:
>
> Sean Farley (seanfarley) pushed a commit to branch master
> in repository macports-ports.
>
>
> https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/commit/ff1f457e8fc9ad431f2d1b77b13e32243209b96d
>
> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/m
On Wednesday April 26 2017 17:32:58 Rainer Müller wrote:
> source, but skip the compilation with pre-compiled archives. These are
> not real packages, as they cannot be installed standalone without a
> source ports tree.
Hmm? You mean the Portfiles? That's not really different from Debian and
pr
On 2017-04-26 14:15, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
>> I really really don't think a PortGroup is the right way to do
>> this. This should be done in base, with proper support of creating
>> multiple packages from a single build and then optionally
>> installing some of them, more like FreeBSD's ports doe
On 2017-04-26 16:36, Zero King wrote:
> Cloning into 'Carthage/Checkouts/Argo'...
> fatal: unable to access 'https://github.com/thoughtbot/Argo.git/': SSL
> certificate problem: Couldn't understand the server certificate format
> fatal: clone of 'https://github.com/thoughtbot/Argo.git' into submodu
Hi,
I've recently updated the carthage port and builds on BuildBot failed in
both updates with one of the following errors when cloning submodules.
Cloning into 'Carthage/Checkouts/Argo'...
fatal: unable to access 'https://github.com/thoughtbot/Argo.git/': SSL
certificate problem: Couldn't unde
On Wednesday April 26 2017 13:32:47 Clemens Lang wrote:
Hi,
> I really really don't think a PortGroup is the right way to do this. This
> should
> be done in base, with proper support of creating multiple packages from a
> single
> build and then optionally installing some of them, more like F
> > Those are all files that are only required when using port "A"
> > as a dependency for *building* other software but not as a dependency
> > for running that dependent software.
>
> The keyword here is "only". It is not unusual to install a library
> (and its header files, and its pkgconfig fi
Hi,
- On 23 Apr, 2017, at 15:54, René J.V. Bertin rjvber...@gmail.com wrote:
> I'd like to draw some attention to a prototype implementation of a PortGroup I
> wrote for creating "dev" ports, akin to Debian/Ubuntu's "-dev" packages:
> https://trac.macports.org/ticket/52713
I really really do
On Apr 23 15:54:07, rjvber...@gmail.com wrote:
> I'd like to draw some attention to a prototype implementation of a PortGroup
> I wrote for creating "dev" ports, akin to Debian/Ubuntu's "-dev" packages:
> https://trac.macports.org/ticket/52713
> I've been using this for a while now and find it pa
libsndfile 1.0.28 has introduced "-Wvla" into its compilation options,
which means it no longer builds on my 10.6.8 which comes with gcc 4.2.1.
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-Wvla"
I brought that up on the sndfile mailing list,
upstream already has a fix for it in their git
(i.e
On 2017-4-26 10:32 , Marius Schamschula wrote:
However, gdbm is not in the dependency chain of gawk, so I don’t know
why MacPorts wants to install it before gawk.
There is no dependency declared, so if you're upgrading all outdated
ports, the ordering of these two is effectively random (as it'
13 matches
Mail list logo
