Sorry 'bout that.
https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/563
On 2017-07-05, at 1:06 PM, Rainer Müller wrote:
>> _resources/port1.0/group/cxx11-1.1.tcl
On 2017-07-03 23:19, Ken wrote:
> Mojca Miklavec (mojca) pushed a commit to branch master
> in repository macports-ports.
>
> https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/commit/1dab0d51d17febdd682ff263502055df81e31b0e
>
> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
> new 1d
Hi all
Since there are things which need discussions on where to add what or what
checks, I guess we can keep them ongoing for now. I've moved to the migrate
action and we can finalize on the issues later when you're back?
Thanks,
Umesh
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Joshua Root wrote:
> On
> On Jul 5, 2017, at 07:46, Chris Jones wrote:
>
> > On 05/07/17 13:38, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> >> On Jul 5, 2017, at 04:00, Chris Jones wrote:
> >>> On 05/07/17 01:14, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Jul 3, 2017, at 13:29, Mohamed Issa wrote:
> > Do the build machines have Java installed? A
On 2017-7-6 03:29 , Rainer Müller wrote:
On 2017-07-05 15:57, Joshua Root wrote:
On 2017-7-5 11:27 , Joshua Root wrote:
I did notice one bug with my initial patch; dependencies.tcl needs to
print "" instead of nothing when there are no active variants. Not
hard to fix.
Here's the fixed versio
On 2017-07-05 18:28, Ken Cunningham wrote:
> I wasn’t around for it, but I think in the beginning /opt/local was chosen
> for macports in part because /usr/local was being heavily used by darwinbuild
> and they needed to keep away from that.
There are several reasons not to use /usr/local:
Lots
On 2017-07-05 15:57, Joshua Root wrote:
> On 2017-7-5 11:27 , Joshua Root wrote:
>> I did notice one bug with my initial patch; dependencies.tcl needs to
>> print "" instead of nothing when there are no active variants. Not
>> hard to fix.
>
> Here's the fixed version.
I just tried to run a build
>
> Yea, compilers that assume /usr/local must be searched for include files are
> broken. Other than that, what else is the issue?
>
> —
I wasn’t around for it, but I think in the beginning /opt/local was chosen for
macports in part because /usr/local was being heavily used by darwinbuild an
On 2017-07-05, at 6:16 AM, Jan Stary wrote:
> On Jul 05 08:38:16, a...@alum.wpi.edu wrote:
> https://trac.macports.org/wiki/FAQ#defaultprefix
> https://trac.macports.org/wiki/FAQ#usrlocal
>
> Can I install software in /usr/local while using MacPorts?
> No. ...
>
>
>> The issue is
On 2017-7-5 11:27 , Joshua Root wrote:
I did notice one bug with my initial patch; dependencies.tcl needs to
print "" instead of nothing when there are no active variants. Not hard
to fix.
Here's the fixed version.
- Josh
diff --git a/mpbb-install-dependencies b/mpbb-install-dependencies
inde
On Jul 5, 2017, at 07:46, Chris Jones wrote:
> On 05/07/17 13:38, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> On Jul 5, 2017, at 04:00, Chris Jones wrote:
>>> On 05/07/17 01:14, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Jul 3, 2017, at 13:29, Mohamed Issa wrote:
> Do the build machines have Java installed? As it stands right n
On 2017-7-5 20:21 , Clemens Lang wrote:
Hey,
- On 5 Jul, 2017, at 03:15, Joshua Root j...@macports.org wrote:
Not so, $default_variants will contain all variants that are selected by
default, regardless of whether they are currently.
I have no idea what I did in my testing yesterday, but
On Jul 05 08:38:16, a...@alum.wpi.edu wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 7:14 AM, Jan Stary wrote:
> >> as it avoids /usr/local/{include,lib} contamination. What are the
> >> thoughts on this?
> >
> > What contamination? I don't even have /usr/local/
>
> You may not have /usr/local, but lots of pe
On 2017-07-04 06:21, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote:
> base currently outputs a warning if system headers are not installed. I
> modified the warning a few months ago when I improved our support for
> building against SDKs, and it now reads:
>
>Warning: System headers do not appear to be i
Hi,
On 05/07/17 13:38, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Jul 5, 2017, at 04:00, Chris Jones wrote:
On 05/07/17 01:14, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Jul 3, 2017, at 13:29, Mohamed Issa wrote:
Do the build machines have Java installed? As it stands right now, any changes
to the Bazel port (or others like it)
On Jul 5, 2017, at 04:00, Chris Jones wrote:
> On 05/07/17 01:14, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> On Jul 3, 2017, at 13:29, Mohamed Issa wrote:
>>> Do the build machines have Java installed? As it stands right now, any
>>> changes to the Bazel port (or others like it) will cause build failures. So
>>> I
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 7:14 AM, Jan Stary wrote:
>> as it avoids /usr/local/{include,lib} contamination. What are the thoughts
>> on this?
>
> What contamination? I don't even have /usr/local/
You may not have /usr/local, but lots of people do. It's the default
installation prefix when compilin
On 2017-07-04 23:18, Joshua Root wrote:
> On 2017-7-5 06:00 , Clemens Lang wrote:
>> You were right on it when you mentioned the failcache. However, you only
>> considered the reading part of the failcache, not the writing part of
>> it.
Makes sense, of course we need the full set of selected vari
On Jul 03 21:21:36, jerem...@macports.org wrote:
> base currently outputs a warning if system headers are not installed. I
> modified the warning a few months ago when I improved our support for
> building against SDKs, and it now reads:
>
>Warning: System headers do not appear to be instal
Hey,
- On 5 Jul, 2017, at 03:15, Joshua Root j...@macports.org wrote:
> Not so, $default_variants will contain all variants that are selected by
> default, regardless of whether they are currently.
I have no idea what I did in my testing yesterday, but you're right. It
was late.
Are you goi
Unless I am mis-remembering Apple stopped shipping any java version with
OSX a while back. So unless you manually install something the build
bots will not have any java version available. versions now should be
downloaded direct from Oracle.
https://support.apple.com/en-gb/HT204036
I belie
21 matches
Mail list logo
