Re: Build base archives for CI in a separate repository

2017-07-27 Thread Mojca Miklavec
Just my 2c. I would also prefer to do the necessary changes in the same repository unless there's a valid technical reason that would prevent us from being able to do it (like Travis not allowing us to build/upload often enough). In case there's a bug in base, it has to be fixed anyway. Mojca

Re: Build base archives for CI in a separate repository

2017-07-27 Thread Zero King
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 07:56:27PM +0200, Clemens Lang wrote: Hi, On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 01:51:31AM +, Zero King wrote: I prefer using a separate repository (only containing .travis.yml and maybe patches, not MacPorts source) because I can update the binaries by creating a new release

Re: [GSoC] migration

2017-07-27 Thread db
On 27 Jul 2017, at 21:21, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: > Migration will uninstall all installed ports and then install all the ports > from the snapshot Yes, but I'm talking about using snapshot and restore at different times with ports being updated between them, likely

Re: [GSoC] migration

2017-07-27 Thread Bradley Giesbrecht
> On Jul 27, 2017, at 11:39 AM, db wrote: > > On 27 Jul 2017, at 00:35, Umesh Singla wrote: >> Hi Josh >>> We don't have version dependencies so no, this sort of check is not >>> possible a priori. Breakage will be caught by rev-upgrade after the

Re: [GSoC] migration

2017-07-27 Thread db
On 27 Jul 2017, at 00:35, Umesh Singla wrote: > Hi Josh >> We don't have version dependencies so no, this sort of check is not possible >> a priori. Breakage will be caught by rev-upgrade after the fact in many >> cases (and if it is set to rebuild automatically, it

Re: [GSoC 2017] Second Evaluation

2017-07-27 Thread Clemens Lang
Hi Jackson, On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 09:40:24PM +0530, Jackson Isaac wrote: > Phase 2 evaluations has begun. Deadline for filling the evaluations is > July 28, 2017 16:00 UTC. The procedure remains the same as previous. > Also please summarize the work done until now, challenges faced and > how

would someone have a moment to trigger a new build of pingus on 10.6.i386.legacy-builder?

2017-07-27 Thread Kenneth F. Cunningham
so we can see if Marcus' new fixes have repaired this defect? Thanks! Ken

Re: Whether to add "by: committer" label?

2017-07-27 Thread Mojca Miklavec
Dear Zero King, On 27 July 2017 at 06:13, Zero King wrote: > Hi, > > The "by: committer" label only provides extra information if the PR > sender is a committer but the port maintainer is not because the port > maintainer can only see the Member label on public members of the > macports