Ryan Schmidt writes:
> On Dec 12, 2017, at 23:59, Sean Farley wrote:
>
>> Sean Farley (seanfarley) pushed a commit to branch master
>> in repository macports-ports.
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/commit/bf7b83422a120fbf2cd1c1b755ea048d27b03b8e
>>
On Dec 13, 2017, at 09:17, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> If I set OCaml so it won't build on 10.6 and earlier, do I need to
> bump the revision number? I figure the answer is no, because there's
> no functional change on the OS versions where it _does_ build...
Correct.
On Dec 13, 2017, at 14:10, Frank Schima wrote:
> Frank Schima (mf2k) pushed a commit to branch master
> in repository macports-ports.
>
>
> https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/commit/d0814b5f3c920ce9ef809d656bc2bdfe4bb98442
>
> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by
On Dec 13, 2017, at 12:39, Ken Cunningham wrote:
> On 2017-12-13, at 8:29 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>>> -maintainers slor.net:james gmail.com:ken.cunningham.webuse
>>> openmaintainer
>>> +maintainers {kencu @kencu} openmaintainer
>>
>> Should James have been removed
On 2017-12-13, at 8:29 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> -maintainers slor.net:james gmail.com:ken.cunningham.webuse
>> openmaintainer
>> +maintainers {kencu @kencu} openmaintainer
>
> Should James have been removed here? In your other changes, you're just
> updating your own
On Dec 12, 2017, at 23:59, Sean Farley wrote:
> Sean Farley (seanfarley) pushed a commit to branch master
> in repository macports-ports.
>
>
> https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/commit/bf7b83422a120fbf2cd1c1b755ea048d27b03b8e
>
> commit bf7b83422a120fbf2cd1c1b755ea048d27b03b8e
>
>
On Dec 13, 2017, at 01:24, Ken wrote:
> Ken (kencu) pushed a commit to branch master
> in repository macports-ports.
>
>
> https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/commit/6742ba037ad7e04c37e0838a92b5b3a821cb085e
>
> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
>
>
If I set OCaml so it won't build on 10.6 and earlier, do I need to
bump the revision number? I figure the answer is no, because there's
no functional change on the OS versions where it _does_ build...
--
Perry E. Metzgerpe...@piermont.com
On 2017-12-13 15:41, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 14:34:03 + Zero King
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 09:22:14AM -0500, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
>>> For the moment, OCaml doesn't work on 10.6 and earlier. There's
>>> some work that can fix that, but it
On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 14:34:03 + Zero King
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 09:22:14AM -0500, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> >For the moment, OCaml doesn't work on 10.6 and earlier. There's
> >some work that can fix that, but it isn't done yet.
> >
> >How does one specify that a
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 09:22:14AM -0500, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
For the moment, OCaml doesn't work on 10.6 and earlier. There's some
work that can fix that, but it isn't done yet.
How does one specify that a port is only for more recent operating
system versions to prevent it from building on
For the moment, OCaml doesn't work on 10.6 and earlier. There's some
work that can fix that, but it isn't done yet.
How does one specify that a port is only for more recent operating
system versions to prevent it from building on older platforms? (I
know how to blacklist ppc for the moment using
12 matches
Mail list logo