On Jan 9, 2018, at 12:27 PM, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> Am I correct in assuming that as things stand, we mostly depend on
> port owners to track security updates on behalf of the project and
> that there isn't a security officer or any such thing? (Not
> complaining, just
Hi Umesh,
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 7:52 AM, Umesh Singla wrote:
> Hi Jackson,
>
> I am not at the stage to mentor but I think I can learn from the experience
> of being an org admin (if we're participating). I couldn't find anything
> more specific about the eligibility
Hi Mojca,
I think, by now, we should have a Wiki or a Trac page for the event
details. It'll be just easy to redirect people to this page for details.
Till now, we only have communication over the emails. Something like
https://trac.macports.org/wiki/Meetings/MacPortsMeeting2016.
Let me know if
Hi,
The meeting will take place from 10th to the 14th March. I managed to
negotiate a much lower price for the same location as in 2016 (close
to Kranjska gora), but we can still discuss some alternatives. The
important part is to mark the dates on your calendar now. The price
should be around
> On Jan 9, 2018, at 9:24 AM, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
>
> On Mon, 8 Jan 2018 18:47:14 +0100 Jan Stary wrote:
>> Hi Jeremy,
>>
>>> On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 06:03:17AM -0800, Jeremy Huddleston
>>> Sequoia wrote:
There are some things that I want to do
Howdy!
I note the version of poppler we're shipping is pretty old, and that
there are CVEs outstanding against it.
Am I correct in assuming that as things stand, we mostly depend on
port owners to track security updates on behalf of the project and
that there isn't a security officer or any such
On Mon, 8 Jan 2018 18:47:14 +0100 Jan Stary wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> > On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 06:03:17AM -0800, Jeremy Huddleston
> > Sequoia wrote:
> > > There are some things that I want to do to the port (and
> > > OpenSSL)
>
> It would be very nice if all ports currently
On 2017-12-15 13:12, Joshua Root wrote:
> After some more time with this change I found another reason to dislike
> it. Since 'leaves' now contains a mix of ports with dependents and
> without, you can't always just uninstall a single port from the list.
>
> I understand this new "all the stuff