On 2018-3-17 09:05 , Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On 16 March 2018 at 15:02, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 16, 2018, at 08:40, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>>
>>> How will you distinguish patchfiles from others, like select lists, ed
>>> files, Makefiles etc?
>>
>> I wouldn't. If the author of the portfile
On 16 March 2018 at 15:02, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Mar 16, 2018, at 08:40, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>
>> How will you distinguish patchfiles from others, like select lists, ed
>> files, Makefiles etc?
>
> I wouldn't. If the author of the portfile finds that distinction important,
> they could con
On 2018-03-16, at 1:04 PM, Eric Le Lay wrote:
> For gPodder +x11 [1], I've added an entry in Info.plist to
> prevent an icon in the dock.
> With +quartz, it uses the py27-gtk-osx-application library to behave like a
> proper Mac app.
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/blob/
On 2018-3-16 22:39 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> I would be happy if lint were changed to just check that patchfile names end
> with .diff or .patch. Would anyone object to that?
I could've sworn we had this conversation years ago and this was the
conclusion. :)
So yes, please do make this change.
-
On Mar 16, 2018, at 11:28 AM, db wrote:
> On 16 Mar 2018, at 16:03, "Daniel J. Luke" wrote:
>> portfiles could in theory attempt to connect to any port, so a comprehensive
>> list like you're asking for is probably not possible to create.
>
> But there could be one in practice, as there is infr
Le Fri, 16 Mar 2018 04:47:36 -0500,
Ryan Schmidt a écrit :
> On Mar 15, 2018, at 23:31, Kevin Reid wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 8:38 PM, Kenneth F. Cunningham wrote:
> >> The dock icon on the ports I launch via the bash script generate
> >> via the app PG seem to never stop bouncing --
On 2018-03-16 12:31, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> While discussing GSOC with Umesh, he repeated what we already
> discussed during the meeting. Students in campuses (including the one
> where he is studying and from which roughly 40 students participate in
> GSOC each year) might be behind proxies and m
On 16 Mar 2018, at 16:03, "Daniel J. Luke" wrote:
> portfiles could in theory attempt to connect to any port, so a comprehensive
> list like you're asking for is probably not possible to create.
But there could be one in practice, as there is infrastructure building all
ports. Ever upgraded out
On Mar 16, 2018, at 8:45 AM, db wrote:
> Is there any list of ports used for installing base and **any other** port?
portfiles could in theory attempt to connect to any port, so a comprehensive
list like you're asking for is probably not possible to create.
It might be worthwhile to look at swi
On Mar 16, 2018, at 08:40, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> How will you distinguish patchfiles from others, like select lists, ed files,
> Makefiles etc?
I wouldn't. If the author of the portfile finds that distinction important,
they could continue to maintain it. port lint wouldn't care.
> I suppor
On Mar 16, 2018, at 08:03, Arno Hautala wrote:
> The only reason I can think of for keeping the prefix is that all
> patches would be sorted together in a file listing. Not a very strong
> reason.
Nothing would prevent a port author from continuing to do that, if they wish to.
How will you distinguish patchfiles from others, like select lists, ed
files, Makefiles etc? I support relaxing rules, but you cannot even rely on
all files matching the relaxed version form.
See also recent discussion about whether lint should return nonzero value
on warnings.
Mojca
The only reason I can think of for keeping the prefix is that all
patches would be sorted together in a file listing. Not a very strong
reason.
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 7:39 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> I think we should relax the restrictions on patchfile naming currently
> implemented in port lint
On 16 Mar 2018, at 12:31, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> While discussing GSOC with Umesh, he repeated what we already
> discussed during the meeting. Students in campuses (including the one
> where he is studying and from which roughly 40 students participate in
> GSOC each year) might be behind proxies
On Mar 15, 2018, at 21:30, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 18:14:16 -0500 Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> On Mar 15, 2018, at 17:41, Adam Mercer wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 3:32 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>>
> Good point. I'll get a patch ready to switch back to the .gz as
>
I think we should relax the restrictions on patchfile naming currently
implemented in port lint. I'd like to discuss it here before I file a ticket.
Currently, we complain if a patchfile is not named "patch-*.diff". But we
already have many files in the repository named "*.patch" for example. We
Hi,
While discussing GSOC with Umesh, he repeated what we already
discussed during the meeting. Students in campuses (including the one
where he is studying and from which roughly 40 students participate in
GSOC each year) might be behind proxies and might not even be able to
run MacPorts due to b
On Mar 16, 2018, at 05:26, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>> The property got called "priority" and right now the nextBuild function only
>> looks at that, not the timestamp. This is fine, so long as portwatcher waits
>> for all portbuilders to finish, as it currently does.
>
> I semi-forgot about that
On 15 March 2018 at 05:31, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Mar 11, 2018, at 06:01, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> We currently build ports in a somewhat random order (see
>> https://trac.macports.org/ticket/52766). By default, the next build that
>> buildbot starts is the one that was scheduled first. But if
On Mar 15, 2018, at 07:00, db wrote:
> On 15 Mar 2018, at 05:13, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> Because PRs come from untrusted sources, we have to assume their contents
>> are tainted. So after any PR is finished building, the VM is tainted and we
>> have to throw it away and make a new one from our te
On Mar 15, 2018, at 07:01, db wrote:
> On 15 Mar 2018, at 05:19, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> On Mar 14, 2018, at 07:23, db wrote:
>>> On 14 Mar 2018, at 01:14, Rainer Müller wrote:
Are you going to sponsor a dedicated Mac server for GitLab CI?
Travis CI is available at no cost and we have no
On Mar 15, 2018, at 23:31, Kevin Reid wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 8:38 PM, Kenneth F. Cunningham wrote:
>> The dock icon on the ports I launch via the bash script generate via the app
>> PG seem to never stop bouncing -- they bounce and bounce, until the
>> application is finally quit, and
22 matches
Mail list logo
