Re: regex for finding all ports using the cxx11 1.0 PG and changing them en-masse to the cxx11 1.1 PG

2018-05-18 Thread Ken Cunningham
Thanks for that, guys. > On May 18, 2018, at 2:18 PM, Marius Schamschula >> wrote: >> >> Drat. Autocorrect strikes again. The regex should be: >> >> >> port file all | xargs grep

Re: regex for finding all ports using the cxx11 1.0 PG and changing them en-masse to the cxx11 1.1 PG

2018-05-18 Thread Craig Treleaven
> On May 18, 2018, at 2:18 PM, Marius Schamschula wrote: > > Drat. Autocorrect strikes again. The regex should be: > > > port file all | xargs grep cxx11 | grep 1.0 > I think that regex needs to be refined a little more: $ port file all | xargs egrep -e '^PortGroup\s+cxx11\s+1\.0' macports-

Re: [MacPorts] #56502: gcc5 @5.5.0_1 error: expected initializer before 'API_AVAILABLE'

2018-05-18 Thread Marius Schamschula
Murray, I see no change in the revision number. However, that should not matter: as 5.5.0_1 did not install, the new changes should still be applied on your platform. The update typically takes several hours to post to the main repository. So wait a bit and try again. > On May 18, 2018, at 1

Re: regex for finding all ports using the cxx11 1.0 PG and changing them en-masse to the cxx11 1.1 PG

2018-05-18 Thread Marius Schamschula
Drat. Autocorrect strikes again. The regex should be: port file all | xargs grep cxx11 | grep 1.0 > On May 18, 2018, at 1:17 PM, Marius Schamschula wrote: > > Ken, > > A quick regex: > > port file all | args grep cxx11 | grep 1.0 > > There are currently 57 ports. > >> On May 18, 2018, at

Re: regex for finding all ports using the cxx11 1.0 PG and changing them en-masse to the cxx11 1.1 PG

2018-05-18 Thread Marius Schamschula
Ken, A quick regex: port file all | args grep cxx11 | grep 1.0 There are currently 57 ports. > On May 18, 2018, at 12:50 PM, Ken Cunningham > wrote: > > It seems that there is no reason for a port to still be in the cxx11 1.0 PG. > > I stumble across them from time to time still. > > Do an

regex for finding all ports using the cxx11 1.0 PG and changing them en-masse to the cxx11 1.1 PG

2018-05-18 Thread Ken Cunningham
It seems that there is no reason for a port to still be in the cxx11 1.0 PG. I stumble across them from time to time still. Do any of the regex-masters have an easy way to find all the cxx11 1.0 PG entries and change them all to 1.1 PG? Thanks, Ken

gcc5 potential fix

2018-05-18 Thread Ken Cunningham
If anyone else can test > and see if it works for them as well, we can commit this fix for gcc5. Ken

Re: configuredistcc=yes and ~/.distcc/hosts

2018-05-18 Thread Rainer Müller
On 2018-05-18 10:41, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > From what I can see in base, distcc is invoked in the controlled build > environment without any attempt at setting things up for distributed > compiling. > I don't exactly have a standard install (and so have $workpath/.home and .tmp > directories)

configuredistcc=yes and ~/.distcc/hosts

2018-05-18 Thread René J . V . Bertin
Hi, You may have understood that I'm looking into using distcc from my message on the other list. >From what I can see in base, distcc is invoked in the controlled build >environment without any attempt at setting things up for distributed compiling. I don't exactly have a standard install (and