On Jun 21, 2018, at 03:44, George Plymale II wrote:
Why are we offering this? Selecting this variant would break any port that
depends on this port. We should strive not to provide users with ways of
shooting themselves in the foot.
>>>
>>> Besides this breaking change, i
Ryan Schmidt writes:
> Your change makes the names of the programs that the grep port installs
> unpredictable -- they will be different depending on whether or not the user
> has selected the variant. Therefore, no other port or script can be certain
> of the names under which the programs ha
> On Jun 22, 2018, at 3:43 PM, Jack Howarth
> wrote:
>
> Won't we have to play games by downgrading the targeted OS from 10.14 to
> 10.13 on Mojave in order to avoid tripping on the new
> 'OPENGL_DEPRECATED(10.0, 10.14);' in GL framework headers?
Deprecation warnings are informational. You
> On Jun 23, 2018, at 1:20 PM, George Plymale II
> wrote:
>
> Ryan Schmidt writes:
>
>> Your change makes the names of the programs that the grep port installs
>> unpredictable -- they will be different depending on whether or not the user
>> has selected the variant. Therefore, no other
Blair Zajac writes:
> I think for an atomic commit so they they are all changed together, it’s one
> PR/commit with multiple approvers. That way we won’t have an in-betwee
> inconsistent state.
Sounds good to me. That's what I'll do then.
