Sure, sorry about that. I was editing a comment with the old value and didn't
consider the effect of your editing the ticket fully when I was notified of it.
Russell
From: MacPorts
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2019 5:47:53 PM
Cc: duncanmmacl...@gmail.com; macports-ti
Hi,
I needed some advise regarding ctrie implementation.
I was constructing the trie data structure which has to be operated from
the address space mapped by mmap(2).
In place of “array of next nodes”, I am using “array of offsets”.
the void * returned from calling mmap(2), I would type cast it a
Hi Mojca,
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 3:03 AM Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> Awesome!
Thank You.
One thing that "urgently" needs to be done is to obfuscate the email
>
(if written at all). I'm not even sure whether we actually want the
> email being displayed there. We need it to send automated emails f
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 11:16:46PM +0530, Mihir Luthra wrote:
> I was constructing the trie data structure which has to be operated
> from the address space mapped by mmap(2). In place of “array of next
> nodes”, I am using “array of offsets”.
Sounds correct.
> the void * returned from calli
What will be the situation with 10.14.5 and its enforcement of
notarization for Applications and kernel extensions for MacPorts? In
particular, will the new notarization requirement limit users to the
MacPorts build machine copies of such packages which have applications
rather than being able
On 2019-4-13 07:57 , Jack Howarth wrote:
> What will be the situation with 10.14.5 and its enforcement of
> notarization for Applications and kernel extensions for MacPorts? In
> particular, will the new notarization requirement limit users to the
> MacPorts build machine copies of such packag
