Re: Support for unreleased beta apple operating systems (was Support for ancient machines and operating systems)

2024-01-09 Thread Sergey Fedorov
To conclude gperftools topic: The following commit drops local rosetta patch, as well as another patch, since both issues are fixed in upstream. It also fixes a broken tests target and updates the port to 2.15.

Re: Support for unreleased beta apple operating systems (was Support for ancient machines and operating systems)

2024-01-09 Thread Sergey Fedorov
So, to Ken’s claim re gperftools. > And now there it sits in the ports tree, a useless MacPorts-only patch, just waiting to break something. To begin with, this is a false statement. The patch is NOT MacPorts-only but backported from the upstream. Of course, Ken did not bother to take a look.

Re: Support for unreleased beta apple operating systems (was Support for ancient machines and operating systems)

2024-01-09 Thread Sergio Had
On Jan 9, 2024 at 03:37 +0800, Joshua Root , wrote: > On 9/1/2024 05:26, Perry E. Metzger wrote: > > On 1/8/24 12:50, Sergey Fedorov wrote: > > > 2. Standard 10.6.8 release from Apple does support building and > > > running ppc binaries via Rosetta. > > > > Why would one want to spend time and

Re: Support for unreleased beta apple operating systems (was Support for ancient machines and operating systems)

2024-01-09 Thread Sergio Had
It is quite a jump from one to hundreds. I stand by my statement: you deliberately mislead everyone claiming that there are numerous 10a190-specific hacks. From memory I recall one merged fix which was not required on standard 10.6.8 but was on 10a190. There are perhaps a dozen which are not