Re: GTK on PowerPC: does anyone have it actually working?

2024-03-16 Thread Sergio Had
Well, I have VLC2 and SDL2 working on 10.6 PowerPC now :) VLC2 looks good now, no messed up colors anymore. SDL2 needs more testing, but I am able to run Grafx2, for example, and it actually works (but very slow, not sure if the code is that bad or SDL2 is that slow as such). > On Mar 16,

Re: GTK on PowerPC: does anyone have it actually working?

2024-03-16 Thread Sergio Had
Ok, you inspired me to finally sort out the mess with X11. And it works in fact. Transmission-x11 is running on 10.6 ppc now with GUI too. > On Mar 16, 2024, at 9:06 AM, Ken Cunningham > wrote: > > > >> On Mar 15, 2024, at 6:05 PM, Ken Cunningham >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Mar 14,

Re: Ruby question: solution for dependency version specs?

2024-03-16 Thread Austin Ziegler
I will investigate it. I’m in the middle of some *really* busy time at work, so it will probably be a couple of months (I’ll set myself a reminder for mid-May, but it’s more likely to be mid-June before I can start), and it will take some time for me to get up to speed with the Ruby pg and look at

Re: Ruby question: solution for dependency version specs?

2024-03-16 Thread Sergio Had
> On Mar 17, 2024, at 6:09 AM, Austin Ziegler wrote: > I reiterate that Ruby application ports (like sup or t) should *probably* be > set up more like Go or Rust ports and that a tool like `go2port` or > `cargo2port` (`gemspec2port, bundler2port`) which ultimately downloads the > gemfiles and

Re: Ruby question: solution for dependency version specs?

2024-03-16 Thread Austin Ziegler
On Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 3:29 PM Sergio Had wrote: > On Mar 17, 2024, at 12:57 AM, Austin Ziegler wrote: > I am most definitely a Ruby expert, but I have yet to run any version of > Ruby from MacPorts (because I use `ruby-build` and `mise` to build versions > of Ruby that I require), and I

Re: GTK on PowerPC: does anyone have it actually working?

2024-03-16 Thread Sergey Fedorov
I actually wonder if we get SDL2 and VLC2 working then as well on Leopard via X11 backend then. On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 3:47 AM Sergey Fedorov wrote: > Ken, thanks for fixing it for gcc7, and great to hear that it works with > GUI. > > I tested it in CLI on 10.6 ppc, that worked fine, but X11

Re: GTK on PowerPC: does anyone have it actually working?

2024-03-16 Thread Sergey Fedorov
Ken, thanks for fixing it for gcc7, and great to hear that it works with GUI. I tested it in CLI on 10.6 ppc, that worked fine, but X11 one fails to launch. (However, it is likely that it is not a problem with the code or with the 10.6 ppc, but rather with conflict between Macports and

Re: Ruby question: solution for dependency version specs?

2024-03-16 Thread Sergio Had
> On Mar 17, 2024, at 12:57 AM, Austin Ziegler wrote: > > I am most definitely a Ruby expert, but I have yet to run any version of Ruby > from MacPorts (because I use `ruby-build` and `mise` to build versions of > Ruby that I require), and I almost exclusively install Ruby packages via `gem

Re: Ruby question: solution for dependency version specs?

2024-03-16 Thread Austin Ziegler
I am most definitely a Ruby expert, but I have yet to run any version of Ruby from MacPorts (because I use `ruby-build` and `mise` to build versions of Ruby that I require), and I almost exclusively install Ruby packages via `gem install`. I have *not* looked at the Ruby pg or many of the Ruby

Ruby question: solution for dependency version specs?

2024-03-16 Thread Sergio Had
Any Ruby experts among us? Some Ruby ports hardcode versions for dependencies in a form restricting those to a given major or minor version. Since many Ruby gems are not updated for years (but still required for other stuff), this presents a problem: any dependency using those will build but