On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:05:34PM +0900, Aaron Madlon-Kay wrote:
> However it was rejected by the maintainer because he *wants* the current
> setup. If the port no longer builds because the referenced commit is more
> than 1,000 commits in the past, then the port is ripe for a bump. Increasing
Hi everyone,
The osxfuse ports and its dependents are in a pretty sad state right
now. I don't know what to do with them -- and I don't have the time to
fix it anyway (I've dropped maintainership). But I thought I'd post
about it here in hopes that someone else can take it up.
There are three ser
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 08:28:19PM +0200, Vincent Habchi wrote:
> I agree wholeheartedly, but since you mention modern compression algorithms,
> isn’t there another one (or more) which would be yet more efficient than xz?
In terms of compressed file size, I'm not sure anything is going to
beat xz
The pgf port installs a latex package that would otherwise be in
texlive-pictures. It's been a separate port mostly for historical
reasons -- it predates our texlive ports.
This port used to be maintained. It's a nomaintainer port now, but
people have still been keeping it up to date.
I'd just as
I've kept looking for a better answer -- either something automated or
for someone upstream to fix the build system -- but this is probably
the best we can do for the moment.
If we could get this applied to the buildbot, that would be great; it'd
make the kludge moot for the majority of users.
Da
