Re: [macports-ports] 01/17: cargo PG: modify comments

2018-04-27 Thread Ryan Schmidt
I know this was already reverted from master because you meant to do it on a branch, but: On Apr 27, 2018, at 17:33, Marcus Calhoun-Lopez wrote: > Marcus Calhoun-Lopez (MarcusCalhoun-Lopez) pushed a commit to branch master > in repository macports-ports. > > > https://github.com/macports/macp

Re: [macports-ports] 01/17: cargo PG: modify comments

2018-04-28 Thread Joshua Root
On 2018-4-28 13:04 , Ryan Schmidt wrote: > According to WikiPedia, "All rights reserved" has no effect in any legal > jurisdiction: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_rights_reserved > > Unless anyone knows otherwise, we may as well remove it everywhere. It's not even true since we explicitl

Re: [macports-ports] 01/17: cargo PG: modify comments

2018-04-29 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Apr 28, 2018, at 04:31, Joshua Root wrote: > On 2018-4-28 13:04 , Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> According to WikiPedia, "All rights reserved" has no effect in any legal >> jurisdiction: >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_rights_reserved >> >> Unless anyone knows otherwise, we may as well remo

Re: [macports-ports] 01/17: cargo PG: modify comments

2018-04-29 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Apr 29, 2018, at 22:26, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > I'm not talking about removing or altering Apple's copyright notices; of > course they should remain. I'm talking about clause 3 of the license, the > non-endorsement clause. > > I didn't claim we should add a second slightly different license i

Re: [macports-ports] 01/17: cargo PG: modify comments

2018-04-30 Thread Rainer Müller
On 2018-04-30 05:26, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Apr 28, 2018, at 04:31, Joshua Root wrote: > >> On 2018-4-28 13:04 , Ryan Schmidt wrote: >>> According to WikiPedia, "All rights reserved" has no effect in any legal >>> jurisdiction: >>> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_rights_reserved >>> >>

Re: [macports-ports] 01/17: cargo PG: modify comments

2018-04-30 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Apr 30, 2018, at 20:16, Rainer Müller wrote: > However, why do we add a license header to the port groups at all? > We also do not add it to each Portfile. I think we should drop the > license headers from all port groups. Files in base have the copyright header. Portgroups used to be in base

Re: [macports-ports] 01/17: cargo PG: modify comments

2018-05-01 Thread Rainer Müller
On 2018-05-01 03:16, Rainer Müller wrote: > However, why do we add a license header to the port groups at all? > We also do not add it to each Portfile. I think we should drop the > license headers from all port groups. https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/1707 Rainer