Hello all.
The github 1.0 portgroup does some post-extract shenanigans to
normalize the result of extracting the distfile: e.g. a GitHub project
`me/myproject` will, as retrieved from GitHub, extract to
`me-myproject-0123abc`; this is moved to `myproject` via globbing:
https://github.com/macports/
After poking around some more I think I can answer my own question:
We don't use the `extract.mkdir yes` solution because it extracts to
worksrcdir, but per the comment in the github 1.0 portgroup (linked in
previous message) the port may want to set worksrcdir to a
subdirectory of the extracted d
Thanks for finding this answer; I wouldn't have remembered.
The github portgroup's post-extract shenanigans are necessary when extracting
an automatically-generated GitHub tarball, because the directory name inside
those tarballs contains the abbreviated git commit hash, which is not a piece
of
Thanks for the additional information, Ryan.
I also found another reason `extract.mkdir yes` doesn’t work for my problem: it
applies to *all* distfiles, whereas for my purposes I would need it to only be
applied to the “main” distfile (as opposed to dependency distfiles).
-Aaron
> On Oct 17,