hey, thanks Ryan for taking care of this little detail.
K
On 2020-10-03, at 11:48 AM, Ken Cunningham wrote:
> Martin, I'm trying to understand how this is happening to you.
>
> you should not need to be doing that in your Portfile, and users should never
> need to make that symlink.
>
On Oct 3, 2020, at 05:42, Nils Breunese wrote:
> There is also ‘known_fail yes’, which I see getting combined with ‘return
> -code error’: https://trac.macports.org/ticket/60566
>
> I’m not familiar with the precise differences between known_fail, ui_error
> and return -code error.
ui_error
Martin, I'm trying to understand how this is happening to you.
you should not need to be doing that in your Portfile, and users should never
need to make that symlink.
The linuxdoc-tools port has this:
depends_build bin:latex:texlive \
path:bin/perl:perl5
But it seems that y
That's. That worked. Preparing a pull request.
Eric F schrieb:
> Try using “return -code error”, something like:
>
> ```tlc
> if {![file exists ${prefix}/bin/perl]} {
> ui_error "
> «${prefix}/bin/perl» is missing but the linuxdoc-tools depends on it.
>
> Please create an appropriate
There is also ‘known_fail yes’, which I see getting combined with ‘return -code
error’: https://trac.macports.org/ticket/60566
I’m not familiar with the precise differences between known_fail, ui_error and
return -code error.
Nils.
> Op 3 okt. 2020, om 12:30 heeft Eric F het volgende
> gesch
Try using “return -code error”, something like:
```tlc
if {![file exists ${prefix}/bin/perl]} {
ui_error "
«${prefix}/bin/perl» is missing but the linuxdoc-tools depends on it.
Please create an appropriate symbolic link for linuxdoc-tools to work.
"
return -code error "missing
Hello,
I working on a version bump on the **cc65** and encountered a problem
with the **linuxdoc-tools**. Since I can't fix the **linuxdoc-tools**
and there is a simple workaround possible I decided to add an if
statement to inform the user together with the workaround:
```tlc
if {! [file
