dav1d is failing on 10.7 and 10.8 on the configure test for atomic.
it's building on 10.6 with clang 9.0, so probably needs to blacklist clangs
older than 10.9's clang.
nothing to do with meson, looks to me...
K
sorry, another look, 10.9 fails so blacklist clangs older that 10.10's clang
should do it.
On 2021-2-3 23:49 , Ken Cunningham wrote:
dav1d is failing on 10.7 and 10.8 on the configure test for atomic.
it's building on 10.6 with clang 9.0, so probably needs to blacklist clangs
older than 10.9's clang.
nothing to do with meson, looks to me...
It's claimed to be written in C99, but r
That was a very nice fix...good to see how to do it properly now and then!
K
> On Feb 3, 2021, at 6:24 AM, Joshua Root wrote:
>
> On 2021-2-3 23:49 , Ken Cunningham wrote:
>> dav1d is failing on 10.7 and 10.8 on the configure test for atomic.
>> it's building on 10.6 with clang 9.0, so probably
> On Feb 3, 2021, at 11:49 AM, Craig Treleaven wrote:
>
> But configure still failed on 10.7 and 10.8:
Oh no! It looked so great! I was really learning some things there. Perhaps it
can be tweaked still.
If not, I guess we can still use the compiler_blacklist_versions approach and
blacklis
On 2021-2-4 12:19 , Ken Cunningham wrote:
On Feb 3, 2021, at 11:49 AM, Craig Treleaven wrote:
But configure still failed on 10.7 and 10.8:
Oh no! It looked so great! I was really learning some things there. Perhaps it
can be tweaked still.
If not, I guess we can still use the compiler_bl
> On Feb 3, 2021, at 10:01 PM, Joshua Root wrote:
>
> On 2021-2-4 12:19 , Ken Cunningham wrote:
>>> On Feb 3, 2021, at 11:49 AM, Craig Treleaven
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> But configure still failed on 10.7 and 10.8:
>> Oh no! It looked so great! I was really learning some things there. Perhaps
>> it
well don't forget it builds just fine with the current meson on 10.6 using
clang-9.0.
so...nothing to do with meson, I would say.
Really, let's just blacklist older clangs and move alonglife is short.
Ken
On Feb 4, 2021, at 08:48, Craig Treleaven wrote:
>> On Feb 3, 2021, at 10:01 PM, Jo
successful build with current meson on 10.6
https://build.macports.org/builders/ports-10.6_x86_64-builder/builds/47455/steps/install-port/logs/stdio
On Feb 4, 2021, at 08:48, Craig Treleaven wrote:
>> On Feb 3, 2021, at 10:01 PM, Joshua Root wrote:
>>
>> On 2021-2-4 12:19 , Ken Cunningham wro
wait, I could have missed the issue...if meson is now adding a default argument
to all checks that means it can never build anything with the default compilers
on <10.10, that would be something we should consider fixing in meson, even if
upstream doesn't want to.
So if testing shows that all b
On Feb 4, 2021, at 11:26, Ken Cunningham wrote:
> wait, I could have missed the issue...if meson is now adding a default
> argument to all checks that means it can never build anything with the
> default compilers on <10.10, that would be something we should consider
> fixing in meson, even
> On Feb 5, 2021, at 10:04 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> That sounds like what Craig is saying: that meson is now adding a compiler
> flag that old compilers don't understand. Meson should check whether a
> compiler supports a flag before it adds it. We should not be responsible for
> fixing
On Feb 6, 2021, at 02:14, Ken Cunningham wrote:
> On Feb 5, 2021, at 10:04 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> That sounds like what Craig is saying: that meson is now adding a compiler
>> flag that old compilers don't understand. Meson should check whether a
>> compiler supports a flag before it
> On Feb 6, 2021, at 4:47 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>
>
> On Feb 6, 2021, at 02:14, Ken Cunningham wrote:
>
>> On Feb 5, 2021, at 10:04 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>
>>> That sounds like what Craig is saying: that meson is now adding a compiler
>>> flag that old compilers don't understand. M
as meson was currently broken on older systems I pushed through a fix for this
just now.
We can revise it to whatever upstream wants to do when they get around to it,
if they want to do anything about it.
I took the opportunity to also add a cross file similar to the ones I added
previously fo
> On Feb 9, 2021, at 12:04 AM, Ken Cunningham
> wrote:
>
>
> PS — any feedback on the success of the cross building, or any failures
> encountered, would be much appreciated. I believe this is the only setup
> that currently allows meson cross building on BigSur that is available for
> ma
16 matches
Mail list logo
