Re: Pick up SDKROOT as the sysroot fallback.

> > Also, note that if you execute the buried clang compilers in > /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin > or /Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/usr/bin that they can't find the SDK. > Jack > The logic to add SDKROOT to the enviro

Re: Pick up SDKROOT as the sysroot fallback.

On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 4:22 PM Ken Cunningham < ken.cunningham.web...@gmail.com> wrote: > >* I did not want to touch that at this point. The gcc bug report is still > *>* open, as far as I can see. > *>>* If someone wants try a build using —with-build-sysroot instead, they are > *>* very welcome

Re: Pick up SDKROOT as the sysroot fallback.

> > I did not want to touch that at this point. The gcc bug report is still > > open, as far as I can see. > > > > If someone wants try a build using —with-build-sysroot instead, they are > > very welcome to try... > > > > Cheers chris > > > > Chris, > I'll try your changes with that hunk rem

Re: Pick up SDKROOT as the sysroot fallback.

On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 1:30 PM Chris Jones wrote: > > > On 13 Oct 2019, at 6:20 pm, Jack Howarth > wrote: > >  > Shouldn't that also strip out... > > if {${configure.sdkroot} ne ""} { > # We should be using --with-build-sysroot here. Using > --with-sysroot > # changes the

Re: Pick up SDKROOT as the sysroot fallback.

> On 13 Oct 2019, at 6:20 pm, Jack Howarth > wrote: > >  > Shouldn't that also strip out... > > if {${configure.sdkroot} ne ""} { > # We should be using --with-build-sysroot here. Using --with-sysroot > # changes the behavior of the installed gcc to look in that sysroot

Re: Pick up SDKROOT as the sysroot fallback.

Shouldn't that also strip out... if {${configure.sdkroot} ne ""} { # We should be using --with-build-sysroot here. Using --with-sysroot # changes the behavior of the installed gcc to look in that sysroot # by default instead of /. Using --with-build-sysroot is suppose

Re: Pick up SDKROOT as the sysroot fallback.

https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/commit/1850136d289019f3b29a5b24d3ec8ef9b23913ee Chris > On 13 Oct 2019, at 5:49 pm, Kenneth F. Cunningham > wrote: > >> Chris, >> FYI, this has alread

Re: Pick up SDKROOT as the sysroot fallback.

> Chris, > FYI, this has already been committed upstream. > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2019-10/msg00148.html > > Jack Yes, this plan is coming along nicely -- some of us know how this came to pass :> I sent that link to Josh a while back when it came out, as support for passin

Re: Pick up SDKROOT as the sysroot fallback.

>> avoid hard coding the SDKROOT path in the compiler during the build. >> >> [Darwin, committed] Pick up SDKROOT as the sysroot fallback. >> <https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/msg00251.html> >> >> Jack smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: Pick up SDKROOT as the sysroot fallback.

to the gcc9 build. > > Chris > > On 13 Oct 2019, at 3:24 pm, Jack Howarth > wrote: > >  >We might want to back port this patch into out gcc9 package in order to > avoid hard coding the SDKROOT path in the compiler during the build. > > [Darwin, committed] Pick

Re: Pick up SDKROOT as the sysroot fallback.

g the SDKROOT path in the compiler during the build. > > [Darwin, committed] Pick up SDKROOT as the sysroot fallback. > > Jack

Pick up SDKROOT as the sysroot fallback.

We might want to back port this patch into out gcc9 package in order to avoid hard coding the SDKROOT path in the compiler during the build. [Darwin, committed] Pick up SDKROOT as the sysroot fallback. <https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/msg00251.html> Jack