Re: keeping software forks under MacPorts repo?

2019-11-09 Thread Chris Jones
> On 9 Nov 2019, at 5:00 pm, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > > On Sat, 9 Nov 2019 at 17:54, Ken Cunningham wrote: >> >> In #57751 Michael and I have been talking about how keeping up the patchset >> for qt4 would probably be easier with our own fork of it, with our patches >> added on. >> >> QT4

Re: keeping software forks under MacPorts repo?

2019-11-09 Thread Christopher Jones
> On 9 Nov 2019, at 5:24 pm, Ken Cunningham > wrote: > > > >> On Nov 9, 2019, at 9:06 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> >> On Nov 9, 2019, at 11:00, Mojca Miklavec wrote: >>> >>> But we would probably want to >>> prefix the repository names (something like "fork_qt", "fork_llvm") to >>> clearly

Re: keeping software forks under MacPorts repo?

2019-11-09 Thread Christopher Jones
> On 9 Nov 2019, at 5:06 pm, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Nov 9, 2019, at 11:00, Mojca Miklavec wrote: >> >> But we would probably want to >> prefix the repository names (something like "fork_qt", "fork_llvm") to >> clearly distinguish them from our main repositories. > > I wouldn't

Re: keeping software forks under MacPorts repo?

2019-11-09 Thread Ken Cunningham
> On Nov 9, 2019, at 9:06 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Nov 9, 2019, at 11:00, Mojca Miklavec wrote: >> >> But we would probably want to >> prefix the repository names (something like "fork_qt", "fork_llvm") to >> clearly distinguish them from our main repositories. > > I wouldn't

Re: keeping software forks under MacPorts repo?

2019-11-09 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Nov 9, 2019, at 11:00, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > > But we would probably want to > prefix the repository names (something like "fork_qt", "fork_llvm") to > clearly distinguish them from our main repositories. I wouldn't necessarily suggest doing that. We're not forking in order to diverge from

Re: keeping software forks under MacPorts repo?

2019-11-09 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Nov 9, 2019, at 10:54, Ken Cunningham wrote: > In #57751 Michael and I have been talking about how keeping up the patchset > for qt4 would probably be easier with our own fork of it, with our patches > added on. > > QT4 has a github repo here and we could fork

Re: keeping software forks under MacPorts repo?

2019-11-09 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Sat, 9 Nov 2019 at 17:54, Ken Cunningham wrote: > > In #57751 Michael and I have been talking about how keeping up the patchset > for qt4 would probably be easier with our own fork of it, with our patches > added on. > > QT4 has a github repo here and we could fork

keeping software forks under MacPorts repo?

2019-11-09 Thread Ken Cunningham
In #57751 Michael and I have been talking about how keeping up the patchset for qt4 would probably be easier with our own fork of it, with our patches added on. QT4 has a github repo here > and we could fork that to MacPorts repo, and add our