Hi,
A quick question to the legacy-support devs: do you have any interest in
whether or not these support functions (plus whatever else is needed and
doable) could help building Wayland for Mac?
FWIW, I brought up the idea of running Wayland with Jeremy H. back when he was
still maintaining XQ
Not really sure what you are asking. legacy-support package is blind to
what ports might be using it. It just supplies functionality missing on
older OSes. If some hypothetical future wayland port needs these
functions, it presumably could use the PG in the same way as everything
else does.
Chris Jones wrote:
Sorry, missed your reply.
I guess what I'm asking is: the legacy-support package/project must have come
into existence because of an interest in running code that requires functions
not present in all Mac OS versions - does that interest cover Wayland too?
I think that at so
Hi,
On 15/10/2019 9:20 am, René J. V. Bertin wrote:
Chris Jones wrote:
Sorry, missed your reply.
I guess what I'm asking is: the legacy-support package/project must have come
into existence because of an interest in running code that requires functions
not present in all Mac OS versions - does
I asked Jeremy about potential Wayland support for macOS awhile back
and his response was that it was pointless duplication as Xquartz already
achieved the same goals.
Jack
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 4:40 AM Chris Jones
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 15/10/2019 9:20 am, René J. V. Bertin wrote:
I’m no expert on Wayland but I found this discussion on a Darwin port a while
back: https://mastodon.technology/@bugaevc/101603518023241841
G.
> Le 15 oct. 2019 à 13:31, Jack Howarth a écrit
> :
>
>
> I asked Jeremy about potential Wayland support for macOS awhile back and
> his respon
