On Feb 22, 2007, at 15:40, Yves de Champlain wrote:
Well I justed added a with_gcj34 variant that should do the trick.
Thank you, that works.
However, the gcj34 port is sort of deprecated and should be
replaced by gcc34 or, even better, gcc41. Revision 2 of pdftk was
a switch from gcj34
On Feb 23, 2007, at 5:21 PM, Altoine Barker wrote:
Jordan, I did not intend for it to be viewed as a optional frill, but
more an option in the sense that the "no-option choice is for the
single
user" and the "optional" choice is for people with either both
architectures or developers of prod
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jordan, I did not intend for it to be viewed as a optional frill, but
more an option in the sense that the "no-option choice is for the single
user" and the "optional" choice is for people with either both
architectures or developers of products for bo
What I do for our locally-written utilities is to use a jimmied cc/
gcc that produces universal binaries by default. It didn't take long
at all to get all of them to build that way, so they are now all
available as universal binaries in our mixed ppc/intel lab. (This
process was helped by th
On Feb 23, 2007, at 11:36 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Now, what we could think about doing is providing some kind of
default, where +universal would use the standard CFLAGS, LDFLAGS
and --disable-dependency-tracking, unless the port itself defines a
+universal variant. This would allow many po
I think you're starting with a fundamental premise that Universal
binaries are something of an optional frill (and that they somehow
use more memory than non-universal ones) - neither statement is,
unfortunately, true.
First, you have to remember that even people who "build all their own
I agree it is a good practice to build my own copy of required
libraries. I know how troublesome it is finding that some
application is dependent on things installed in /sw. Pity to the
nameless company. ;-)
In my case I don't really bundle MacPorts library files in my app nor
require them
Hi,
with several versions of wxWidgets I've had to uninstall it before it
builds, meaning that instead of upgrade one has to uninstall and
install it. You could try that, whenever the build fails. But the
srchctrl.h missing is something I saw while building wxPython 2.8.0.1
against wxWidge
On Feb 23, 2007, at 12:23, Altoine Barker wrote:
I'm reading up on universal binaries and such now. I see your point
but
I think it should be an option or flag that you can choose for any
particular port and not default for all ports, unless, an option to
choose to the contrary is selected to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I know what company you speak of and they will continue to remain
nameless, but all they had to do was change the default directory of
their program. I found that to be quite amusing myself but a good lesson
learned. Well, it was the default directory
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm reading up on universal binaries and such now. I see your point but
I think it should be an option or flag that you can choose for any
particular port and not default for all ports, unless, an option to
choose to the contrary is selected to address
On Feb 20, 2007, at 06:41, Tabitha McNerney wrote:
I was on a leave of absence for a few months and when I came back I
noticed that, in Software Update on our Mac at our office which has
Darwin (and now Mac) Ports installed suggested that there is a new
X11 update from Apple that among othe
En/na Kevin Ballard ha escrit:
In general, building something with MacPorts and shipping it as part
of an application is a risky business. I strongly recommend building
the library yourself instead of relying on MacPorts to do it.
One example of this is the app HyperEdit. When the developer ad
There is a corollary to this, which is even if you do bundle up the
appropriate MacPorts bits, you're now polluting a namespace that's
not really under your control. A commercial company who shall remain
nameless found this out to their displeasure when they shipped
software which installe
In general, building something with MacPorts and shipping it as part
of an application is a risky business. I strongly recommend building
the library yourself instead of relying on MacPorts to do it.
One example of this is the app HyperEdit. When the developer added
the feature where HyperE
Is that one of them-there rhetorical questions? :-)
There are lots of good reasons to want universal binaries. For one,
it allows you to NFS/AFP/... share a single /opt/local among machines
(who says that directory always has to be local?) without having to
worry about which architecture
Say my application will build a library which statically link to
several libraries in MacPorts , so what I need is the universally
built library binary. Then my app can just bundle required UB libs.
What I can do now is using lipo to stitch intel and ppc binaries
together.
my .2 cents
-
On Feb 23, 2007, at 12:01 PM, Kevin Ballard wrote:
Most of it. But I'm a bit confused. running xhost says only
authorized clients can connect, but the list is empty. This
indicates that one of the other mechanisms of access control is
active, but my .Xauthority file is empty. So I'm not real
On Feb 23, 2007, at 11:55 AM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
It seems to me if you use :0.0 as your DISPLAY then it'll connect
on the loopback interface rather than using the network interface,
and I would expect that to always be allowed to connect.
Where do my assumptions break down?
Did you rea
On Feb 23, 2007, at 11:47 AM, Kevin Ballard wrote:
Why wouldn't localhost always be allowed to connect?
because multiple users can be logged into a unix machine.
Any X11 client can get information from the Xserver about other
clients (like keystrokes).
It seems to me if you use :0.0 as you
Why wouldn't localhost always be allowed to connect? It seems to me
if you use :0.0 as your DISPLAY then it'll connect on the loopback
interface rather than using the network interface, and I would expect
that to always be allowed to connect.
Where do my assumptions break down?
On Feb 23,
That's what was suggested to me regarding gtkwave, which is in the
same predicament. Though first we should check if for example FreeBSD
ports already hosts the files somewhere; if so, maybe we could use
those.
On Feb 23, 2007, at 09:33, Kevin Ballard wrote:
If there's no versioned downloa
Upgraded to the latest XCode tools from the Apple Developer Downloads
(changed build number of gcc), and then gcc42 built just fine.
~~
Edward D. Zaron
Research Associate
Hydrodynamic Process and Ecosystems Research Group
Department of Civil an
On Feb 23, 2007, at 10:38 AM, Kevin Ballard wrote:
I'm not particularly familiar with how X servers work, but I
thought that usually to connect to a local X server you set your
DISPLAY to :0.0 which makes it connect to localhost.
Because of the design of X, there are potential security issue
I'm not particularly familiar with how X servers work, but I thought
that usually to connect to a local X server you set your DISPLAY to :
0.0 which makes it connect to localhost.
Perhaps installing XFree86 does something to set DISPLAY to your
particular hostname? This seems odd, but I don'
I'm curious as to why you want universal binaries. In general,
binaries produced via MacPorts can't be copied between platforms, as
they need all the libraries they depend on. Sure, you can copy your
entire MacPorts /opt/local tree, but outside of doing that it's quite
hard to migrate the b
If there's no versioned download URL, perhaps we should throw it into
svn.macports.org/distfiles?
On Feb 22, 2007, at 12:10 PM, Elias Pipping wrote:
btw...
http://mel.icious.net/macosx/ports/net/fl0p/Portfile
version devel
categories net
i see you're downloadin
Sorry, no. It would be nice to have that at some point, but right now
the website doesn't really have a lot on it.
And hey, fancy seeing you here. Haven't seen your name in years ;)
-Kevin Ballard
On Feb 22, 2007, at 10:20 AM, Lorin Rivers wrote:
is there an updated list of available ports
On Feb 23, 2007, at 1:15 AM, Tabitha McNerney wrote:
Today I needed to change the hostname of a Mac (running 10.4.8)
which has previously been installed with numerous MacPorts
including XDarwin via XFree86.
After changing the hostname and then running:
how did you change the hostname?
Did
Thanks for the patch. However, I do need the printing functionality too.
The problem seems to be in the Portfile, and with a little fix it builds
fine.
Teus.
Andreas Wuest wrote:
I had a similar problem earlier on with gtk 2.10.2 on OS 10.4 (a newer
gtk version then fixed it for me).
I've po
Hi Teus
On 2/21/07, Teus Benschop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Trying to install gtk2 using command sudo port install gtk2, it gives
the errors given below. It happens on OS 10.3.
Does anybody know how to get around this?
I had a similar problem earlier on with gtk 2.10.2 on OS 10.4 (a ne
31 matches
Mail list logo
