Creating symlinks to files that don't exist

2007-05-07 Thread David Liontooth
>- ln uses new symlink command so it can create symlinks that point to > files that don't actually exist (eridius r2). How is this done? It would come in extremely handy. ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http:/

Followup: FUSE ports [was Re: sshfs]

2007-05-07 Thread Jyrki Wahlstedt
On 8.5.2007, at 8.20, Jyrki Wahlstedt wrote: Hi, as a followup: I've verified this, I just built fusefs on my case- sensitive system, created a ticket (#11918) with diff for Portfile and a patch, and also reported this upstream (issue #11, IIRC). Well, I checked the home site and it seems

Re: FUSE ports [was Re: sshfs]

2007-05-07 Thread Jyrki Wahlstedt
On 7.5.2007, at 9.35, Jyrki Wahlstedt wrote: On 4.5.2007, at 6.21, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: My bigger question is how people are managing to use anything depending on fuse at all, at the moment. On 10.4.9, I get the following build error for libfuse: /opt/local/var/db/dports/build/ _U

MacPorts v1.4.40 released for self update

2007-05-07 Thread James Berry
Here's the change log: James Release 1.4.40 (7-May-2007, tagged at r24909 by jberry): - Note the bump in version naming. To leave ourselves lots of room in our versioning scheme, we've jumped from 1.4.3 to 1.4.40. The floating point represenation as reported by port version

Re: osxvnc port fails to build

2007-05-07 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On May 7, 2007, at 22:17, David Liontooth wrote: sudo port install osxvnc ---> Fetching osxvnc ---> Attempting to fetch osxvnc-20060722.tar.gz from http://www.opendarwin.org/~pguyot/distfiles/ ---> Verifying checksum(s) for osxvnc ---> Extracting osxvnc ---> Applying patches to osxvnc --->

Re: release schedules (was Re: hosting an internal macports server with binaries)

2007-05-07 Thread James Berry
On May 7, 2007, at 8:15 PM, paul beard wrote: On May 7, 2007, at 8:04 PM, Paul Guyot wrote: However, this functionality is broken in 1.4.3. This bug was fixed three weeks ago, but the people in charge here think we should not make too often releases, so you'll have to use trunk or wait fo

osxvnc port fails to build

2007-05-07 Thread David Liontooth
sudo port install osxvnc ---> Fetching osxvnc ---> Attempting to fetch osxvnc-20060722.tar.gz from http://www.opendarwin.org/~pguyot/distfiles/ ---> Verifying checksum(s) for osxvnc ---> Extracting osxvnc ---> Applying patches to osxvnc ---> Configuring osxvnc ---> Building osxvnc Error: Tar

release schedules (was Re: hosting an internal macports server with binaries)

2007-05-07 Thread paul beard
On May 7, 2007, at 8:04 PM, Paul Guyot wrote: However, this functionality is broken in 1.4.3. This bug was fixed three weeks ago, but the people in charge here think we should not make too often releases, so you'll have to use trunk or wait for the fix. I'm sure this has been discussed e

Re: hosting an internal macports server with binaries

2007-05-07 Thread Paul Guyot
On May 8, 2007, at 11:28 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On May 7, 2007, at 17:39, Rick Gigger wrote: Is it possible to have an internal macports mirror that also contains binaries, so I can compile all the ports I need once and install them on several boxes instead of re-compiling everything on

Re: hosting an internal macports server with binaries

2007-05-07 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On May 7, 2007, at 17:39, Rick Gigger wrote: Is it possible to have an internal macports mirror that also contains binaries, so I can compile all the ports I need once and install them on several boxes instead of re-compiling everything on every single box? That functionality does not exi

Re: hosting an internal macports server with binaries

2007-05-07 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On May 7, 2007, at 18:35, David Liontooth wrote: Rick Gigger wrote: Is it possible to have an internal macports mirror that also contains binaries, so I can compile all the ports I need once and install them on several boxes instead of re-compiling everything on every single box? Great que

Re: hosting an internal macports server with binaries

2007-05-07 Thread paul beard
On May 7, 2007, at 4:35 PM, David Liontooth wrote: Great question. And even before the question of a local mirror: is there a format for packaging a set of binaries that can then be installed into an existing system -- like a *.deb or *.rpm file? Why not just mount /opt from a master mach

Re: /bin/date and coreutils

2007-05-07 Thread David Liontooth
paul beard wrote: > > On May 7, 2007, at 12:13 PM, David Liontooth wrote: > >> This is very cool, as it allows my scripts to be crossplatform. >> > > Sort of: on OS X you'll need to test for that and use gdate. That's what I do with sed -- if gnused exists, use that. Are there disadvantages to ins

Re: hosting an internal macports server with binaries

2007-05-07 Thread David Liontooth
Rick Gigger wrote: > Is it possible to have an internal macports mirror that also contains > binaries, so I can compile all the ports I need once and install them > on several boxes instead of re-compiling everything on every single box? Great question. And even before the question of a local mirro

Re: Did location of mysql.sock change in mysql5.0.37?

2007-05-07 Thread Bakki Kudva
On 5/7/07, Emory Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: not sure what else to suggest ... youre sure none of the following exist on either box? That's ok, thank you very much for all the info. I got it working for now with a ln -s /opt/local/var/run/mysql5/mysqld.sock /tmp/mysql.sock With this link

hosting an internal macports server with binaries

2007-05-07 Thread Rick Gigger
Is it possible to have an internal macports mirror that also contains binaries, so I can compile all the ports I need once and install them on several boxes instead of re-compiling everything on every single box? Thanks, Rick Gigger ___ macports-user

Re: Bacula has no maintainer?

2007-05-07 Thread Tabitha McNerney
Thank you Maun Suang and Ryan Schmidt with the updates regarding Bacula and how its not an uncommon occurrence to have a MacPort that has no maintainer listed. I need to ask my boss first before I could commit to adopting Bacula as a new maintainer (believe it or not, while the company I work for

Re: /bin/date and coreutils

2007-05-07 Thread paul beard
On May 7, 2007, at 12:13 PM, David Liontooth wrote: This is very cool, as it allows my scripts to be crossplatform. Sort of: on OS X you'll need to test for that and use gdate. tichy:~ paul$ DAY="$(gdate -d "-7 day" +%F)" tichy:~ paul$ echo $DAY 2007-04-30 -- Paul Beard words: http://paulbe

Re: /bin/date and coreutils

2007-05-07 Thread David Liontooth
paul beard wrote: > > On May 7, 2007, at 11:52 AM, David Liontooth wrote: > >> The date utility is bundled in coreutils on debian, along with cat chown >> >> df ln and so on -- I imagine this can't easily be ported? >> > > I think you're covered: > > port info coreutils > coreutils 6.9, sysutils/c

Re: /bin/date and coreutils

2007-05-07 Thread Elias Pipping
Alright, forget what I said ;) On May 7, 2007, at 8:59 PM, Marc André Selig wrote: On 5/7/07, David Liontooth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In OSX, /bin/date doesn't support the -d switch But it does have the -r switch. ;-) [...] To pick the date, I use DAY="$(date -d "-$1 day" +%F)" T

Re: /bin/date and coreutils

2007-05-07 Thread David Liontooth
Marc André Selig wrote: > On 5/7/07, David Liontooth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> In OSX, /bin/date doesn't support the -d switch > > But it does have the -r switch. ;-) > > [...] > >> To pick >> the date, I use >> >> DAY="$(date -d "-$1 day" +%F)" >> >> The -d switch allows me to subtract day

Re: /bin/date and coreutils

2007-05-07 Thread Elias Pipping
No, I don't think so, judging by its manpage[1]. [1] http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Darwin/Reference/ ManPages/man1/date.1.html Regards, Elias Pipping On May 7, 2007, at 8:52 PM, David Liontooth wrote: In OSX, /bin/date doesn't support the -d switch date: illegal option --

Re: /bin/date and coreutils

2007-05-07 Thread paul beard
On May 7, 2007, at 11:52 AM, David Liontooth wrote: The date utility is bundled in coreutils on debian, along with cat chown df ln and so on -- I imagine this can't easily be ported? I think you're covered: port info coreutils coreutils 6.9, sysutils/coreutils (Variants: universal, with_

Re: /bin/date and coreutils

2007-05-07 Thread Marc André Selig
On 5/7/07, David Liontooth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In OSX, /bin/date doesn't support the -d switch But it does have the -r switch. ;-) [...] To pick the date, I use DAY="$(date -d "-$1 day" +%F)" The -d switch allows me to subtract days (or minutes or seconds) from today's date. Is

/bin/date and coreutils

2007-05-07 Thread David Liontooth
In OSX, /bin/date doesn't support the -d switch date: illegal option -- d In the case of sed, I needed the -r switch and found gsed, providing gnused, in macports, which works great. The date utility is bundled in coreutils on debian, along with cat chown df ln and so on -- I imagine this c

Re: Did location of mysql.sock change in mysql5.0.37?

2007-05-07 Thread Emory Smith
not sure what else to suggest ... youre sure none of the following exist on either box? /etc/my.cnf ~/.my.cnf /opt/local/etc/mysql5/my.cnf a diff of the result from mysql> show variables; should tell you whether its the configuration ... -e On May 7, 2007, at 10:14 AM, Bakki Kudva

Re: FUSE ports [was Re: sshfs]

2007-05-07 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
On May 7, 2007, at 1:27 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: Perhaps. But note that Apple used to specifically tell you not to use case-sensitive HFS+ for your boot volume in the 10.3 days. See the first paragraph: http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=107863 While this is true, "Apple" also

Re: FUSE ports [was Re: sshfs]

2007-05-07 Thread Landon Fuller
On May 7, 2007, at 01:27, Ryan Schmidt wrote: Note also that probably none of the MacPorts contributors have case- sensitive HFS+ setups, so probably nobody other than you will discover or be affected by such problems. While I would expect such problems to be rare, they would be nonexistent

Re: Did location of mysql.sock change in mysql5.0.37?

2007-05-07 Thread Bakki Kudva
On 5/7/07, Emory Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: are you sure the mysql5 daemon is running? (try running "ps aux | grep mysqld") Yes it is running and I can connect to it form the command line. if you really just did "port upgrade", its probably still the mysql4 daemon running on the envirn

Re: Did location of mysql.sock change in mysql5.0.37?

2007-05-07 Thread Emory Smith
On May 5, 2007, at 9:02 PM, Bakki Kudva wrote: I just did a port -u update and didn't get any errors. are you sure the mysql5 daemon is running? (try running "ps aux | grep mysqld") if you really just did "port upgrade", its probably still the mysql4 daemon running on the envirnment th

problem during com.apple.install with my new Port

2007-05-07 Thread Michael Thon
Hello - I am having trouble with a new Portfile that I'm writing. Here is the relevant part of the debug output: DEBUG: Executing com.apple.install (hmmer) couldn't change working directory to "/opt/local/var/db/dports/build/ _Users_mike_macports_dports_science_hmmer/work/destroot": no such

Re: missing dependency in gnupg2

2007-05-07 Thread paul beard
On May 6, 2007, at 11:25 PM, Boey Maun Suang wrote: I haven't heard from waqar@ in a while, so I thought I'd ask you about this problem. I'm happy to add gpg-agent as a dependency if need be, but I'd like to see if I can work out just how essential it is. So: 1) What command did you ex

Re: GTKwave instalation failed

2007-05-07 Thread Johnny Wang
Dear all, GTKwave has a newer version, 3.0.28. Macports still looks for 3.0.24. An update on version number will be nice. Many thanks. On 4/5/07, Johnny Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dear all, I tried installing GTKwave using the command port -v install gtkwave, it worked before but now it

Re: FUSE ports [was Re: sshfs]

2007-05-07 Thread Jyrki Wahlstedt
On 7.5.2007, at 11.27, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On May 7, 2007, at 01:35, Jyrki Wahlstedt wrote: there seems to be one small problem with the package. It does not build on case-sensitive filesystems! It failed in my home laptop, though there were no problems in my work laptop. The main differ

Re: FUSE ports [was Re: sshfs]

2007-05-07 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On May 7, 2007, at 01:35, Jyrki Wahlstedt wrote: there seems to be one small problem with the package. It does not build on case-sensitive filesystems! It failed in my home laptop, though there were no problems in my work laptop. The main difference between the units is the filesystem, at w