try to install it on my powerbook 12" (Tiger 10.4.5) with command `sudo port
install argtable` but it fails when building
here is the output.
**
---> Building argtable with target all
Error: Target org.macports.build returned: shell
2007/08/15 9:47, Randall Wood wrote:
Try the following:
sudo port deactivate heimdal ; sudo port -vd upgrade gnome-vfs
Here is an end on the result, which is too long.
--
toto:~$ sudo port deactivate heimdal
Password:
---> Deactivating heimdal
toto:~$ sudo port -vd upgrade gnome-vfs
On Aug 14, 2007, at 22:23, Sean Fulton wrote:
On 2007-08-13 02:40:21 -0400, Anders F Björklund said:
mpu78 wrote:
I'm a Unix user who is new to Mac and MacPorts. I've just started
installing
things using `port' today, i.e. after the release of MacPorts
1.5.1, which I
understand does the
On 2007-08-13 02:40:21 -0400, Anders F Björklund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
mpu78 wrote:
I'm a Unix user who is new to Mac and MacPorts. I've just started installing
things using `port' today, i.e. after the release of MacPorts 1.5.1, which I
understand does these `mtree' checks.
I'm not able
Try the following:
sudo port deactivate heimdal ; sudo port -vd upgrade gnome-vfs
If after this, no ports depend on heimdal, you can uninstall it.
On 14 Aug 2007, at 20:05, Toru Murakami wrote:
Hi folks,
gnome-vfs fails to be built, when I try to upgrade it.
I am on Mac OS X 10.4.10 and Mac
Mike Alexander wrote:
--On August 13, 2007 4:31:43 PM +1000 Boey Maun Suang
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/08/2007, at 06:22, David Rowe wrote:
1) Gnucash apparently installed OK, but when I try to launch it,
the X11 log reports:
<<
dyld: Symbol not foun
Hi folks,
gnome-vfs fails to be built, when I try to upgrade it.
I am on Mac OS X 10.4.10 and MacPorts 1.510.
Thanks in advance.
--
toto:~$ sudo port -vd upgrade gnome-vfs
Password:
DEBUG: Found port in file:///Users/Shared/ports/gnome/gnome-vfs
DEBUG: epoch: in tree: 0 installed: 0
DEB
On Aug 14, 2007, at 07:37, Michael wrote:
Not the OP, but I'm seeing the same problem. I've got a fully-
updated 10.3.9 on
a beige G3 AIO (with a G4 processor upgrade), with 1.510, XCode
version 1.5, and
no Fink.
I've wondered whether there might be a problem with a mismatch of
the instal
On Aug 14, 2007, at 07:37, Michael wrote:
Not the OP, but I'm seeing the same problem. I've got a fully-
updated 10.3.9 on
a beige G3 AIO (with a G4 processor upgrade), with 1.510, XCode
version 1.5, and
no Fink.
I've wondered whether there might be a problem with a mismatch of
the install
On Aug 14, 2007, at 10:59, Thomas Schober wrote:
2007/8/14, Thomas Schober:
2007/8/14, Ryan Schmidt:
On Aug 14, 2007, at 02:57, Thomas Schober wrote:
2007/8/14, Ryan Schmidt:
On Aug 14, 2007, at 02:25, Thomas Schober wrote:
2007/8/14, Ryan Schmidt:
On Aug 14, 2007, at 01:41, Thomas S
On Aug 14, 2007, at 08:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 14, 2007, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Aug 13, 2007, at 05:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I try to install some X11 components, but all the time "DestRoot"
stop, because the files are available.
This is true, because "DestRoot" try to link
Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Not having applied a diff patch before, I'm at something of a loss. I do
>expect it to get hairy, though.
I'll add instructions for how to apply patches manually to the "Creating
Patchfiles" section of the new guide tonight. I see I didn't put in
anything abou
Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>There should be a bit more specificity about the assumptions made at your
>end,
>or the scope of what interests you. 10.3, implicitly does (at the
>moment), else
>there wouldn't be a version specific to it available. But there's a
>forgotten
>ignorance at play w
Michael gmail.com> writes:
> Still wondering about thte gtk2 install, though.
Reference is made to a diff file here:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-list/2006-August/msg00275.html
The errors in the post prompting the reply referenced above appear to be
the same as those I'm seeing in tryin
Here's a ilnk to the trac ticket
http://trac.macports.org/projects/macports/ticket/12476
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
macports.org> writes:
>
> Michael gmail.com> writes:
> >I've wondered whether there might be a problem with a mismatch of the
> >installed
> >XCode and the version of MacPorts in play here - neither
> >http://www.macports.org/ nor
> >http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/wiki/Installing
Here you go. This is just an example I picked up from a tutorial site.
The same thing happens on all the documentation for mercurial. That is
where I first ran into the problem was trying to build mercurial from
source.
This happens on two different installations of macports for me, so I think
ok, i fixed the problem:
i just created
/opt/local/var/macports/build/_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_release_ports_devel_readline/work/destroot/opt/local/share/info/dir
this directory was missing
2007/8/14, Thomas Schober <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The Problem is, that this lin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Simon Ruderich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I think for "normal" users there is no difference and you are right, it
>> would be better to use selfupdate. I should have used that in the mail,
>> thanks for the hint; will d
Simon Ruderich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>I think for "normal" users there is no difference and you are right, it
>would be better to use selfupdate. I should have used that in the mail,
>thanks for the hint; will do next time.
Oh I wasn't meaning to say you shouldn't tell people to use 'port sy
Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>I've wondered whether there might be a problem with a mismatch of the
>installed
>XCode and the version of MacPorts in play here - neither
>http://www.macports.org/ nor
>http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/wiki/InstallingMacPorts are
>particularly helpf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Half an hour normally. Then use `sudo port sync` to update your ports
>> tree and to get the newest updates. Then run the command.
>
> Are there good reasons not to do a selfupdate? I haven't even documented
> 'port sync
>Half an hour normally. Then use `sudo port sync` to update your ports
>tree and to get the newest updates. Then run the command.
Are there good reasons not to do a selfupdate? I haven't even documented
'port sync' in the new guide because I'm still waiting for an argument for
its utility. Can s
Hi,
I am having some minor problems with Apple-supplied X, in that
"transitory" effects (I am not sure how to call them, but they include the
save progress bar in Openoffice or the window outlines in "technical" or
"box" window movement in E16) do not appear. This becomes aggravating
when doing i
Great job ;)
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Susan Mackay wrote:
> Thanks for the information. However, one answer leads to two questions:
>
> 1) what sort of time frame is "a short while" (days, weeks,)
Half an hour normally. Then use `sudo port sync` to update your ports
tree and to get
Ryan Schmidt macports.org> writes:
>
> On May 6, 2007, at 20:26, Daniel Wolk wrote:
> > I tried installing gtk2 with the following command:
> > port -v install gtk2
> > It errored out with the following:
> > gtkprintbackendcups.c: In function 'create_pickone_option':...
> > Any ideas?
> - What
Thanks for the information. However, one answer leads to two questions:
1) what sort of time frame is "a short while" (days, weeks,)
2) is there somewhere I can look to se if things like this have already been
reported to same the 'noise' in the list? (I couldn't find anything in this
list wh
On Aug 14, 2007, at 02:57, Thomas Schober wrote:
2007/8/14, Ryan Schmidt:
On Aug 14, 2007, at 02:25, Thomas Schober wrote:
> 2007/8/14, Ryan Schmidt:
>
>> On Aug 14, 2007, at 01:41, Thomas Schober wrote:
>>
>> > # $Id: Portfile 22478 2007-03-02 05:16:40Z
[EMAIL PROTECTED] $
>> >
>> > Port
On Aug 14, 2007, at 02:25, Thomas Schober wrote:
2007/8/14, Ryan Schmidt:
On Aug 14, 2007, at 01:41, Thomas Schober wrote:
> # $Id: Portfile 22478 2007-03-02 05:16:40Z [EMAIL PROTECTED] $
>
> PortSystem 1.0
> name readline-5
> set shortname readline
> version 5.0.005
Ok, i will try this when i am at home today evening. I synced about 2 weeks
ago and made a selfupdate about 2 weeks ago. Update Frequency seems to be
very high :)
2007/8/14, Ryan Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> On Aug 14, 2007, at 01:21, Thomas Schober wrote:
>
> > 2007/8/14, Ryan Schmidt:
> >
31 matches
Mail list logo
