Re: "port: command not found" after installing MacPorts-1.6.0-10.5-Leopard.dmg

2008-02-07 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Feb 7, 2008, at 21:23, Esteban Barahona wrote: Asunto: "port: command not found" after installing MacPorts-1.6.0-10.5-Leopard.dmg I downloaded the latest package to install macports; but the "port command" doesn't work. I read the guide up to 2.4. MacPorts and the Shell (at http:// gui

"port: command not found" after installing MacPorts-1.6.0-10.5-Leopard.dmg

2008-02-07 Thread Esteban Barahona
Asunto: "port: command not found" after installing MacPorts-1.6.0-10.5- Leopard.dmg I downloaded the latest package to install macports; but the "port command" doesn't work. I read the guide up to 2.4. MacPorts and the Shell (at http://guide.macports.org ) after disabling "invisible files"

Re: gpgme variant for mutt-devel?

2008-02-07 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Feb 7, 2008, at 02:46, Christoph Ludwig wrote: On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 08:08:12PM +0100, Christoph Ludwig wrote: On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 12:50:20PM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Jan 2, 2008, at 02:18, Christoph Ludwig wrote: I have a request: I'd be grateful if support for mutt's gpgme

Re: gnucash won't build with guile16 and won't run with guile (1.8)

2008-02-07 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Feb 7, 2008, at 10:25, Lenore Horner wrote: The maintainer has said he doesn't use it any more and therefore disinterest in upgrading the port. gnucash has no maintainer at this time. ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macos

Re: Is there lesstif-devel for macports?

2008-02-07 Thread Michael Franz
Ryan, On Feb 7, 2008 8:37 PM, Ryan Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Feb 7, 2008, at 19:26, Michael Franz wrote: > > > I have installed lesstif but the development header files are > > missing. Does macports have a version that includes the headers? > > Where would I get Xm/Xm.h? > > Mac

Re: Is there lesstif-devel for macports?

2008-02-07 Thread Michael Franz
Rainer, On Feb 7, 2008 8:36 PM, Rainer Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael Franz wrote: > > Hi, > > Hi, > > First of all, *-devel has nothing to do with headers or stuff needed for > developers only. *-devel ports are newser versions of the port, mostly > considered unstable. > I guess I

Re: Is there lesstif-devel for macports?

2008-02-07 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Feb 7, 2008, at 19:26, Michael Franz wrote: I have installed lesstif but the development header files are missing. Does macports have a version that includes the headers? Where would I get Xm/Xm.h? MacPorts does not use -devel ports for this purpose. (MacPorts -devel ports serve an

Re: Is there lesstif-devel for macports?

2008-02-07 Thread Rainer Müller
Michael Franz wrote: Hi, Hi, First of all, *-devel has nothing to do with headers or stuff needed for developers only. *-devel ports are newser versions of the port, mostly considered unstable. I have installed lesstif but the development header files are missing. Does macports have a ve

Is there lesstif-devel for macports?

2008-02-07 Thread Michael Franz
Hi, I have installed lesstif but the development header files are missing. Does macports have a version that includes the headers? Where would I get Xm/Xm.h? Michael ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macos

Re: Patching configure - Or Not

2008-02-07 Thread Daniel J. Luke
On Feb 7, 2008, at 11:19 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Patching configure is going to be very fragile. Daniel> On the other hand, if you patch the inputs to configure, you Daniel> then depend on having autoconf installed on the end user's Daniel> machine. Why would that be a problem

Re: Patching configure - Or Not

2008-02-07 Thread Michael Franz
I'll take a look. This might come in handy later. I post a question to the icedtea list and they fixed the configure script for me. On to my next issue! On Feb 7, 2008 11:41 AM, Rainer Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael Franz wrote: > > Since I cannot figure out how to get aclocal, auto

Re: Patching configure - Or Not

2008-02-07 Thread skip
>> Patching configure is going to be very fragile. Daniel> On the other hand, if you patch the inputs to configure, you Daniel> then depend on having autoconf installed on the end user's Daniel> machine. Why would that be a problem? Can't the portfile just specify the dependency

Emacs Info Directory node

2008-02-07 Thread Matt Hippely
I have emacs @22.1_1+darwin_8 (active) on Tiger (up to date). If I start ($~/emacs) emacs from my home directory and run C-h i I get the message Can't find the Info directory node. But, if I start ($/opt/local/bin/emacs-22.1) emacs from the macports installation directoryC-h i it will load the *inf

Re: macports installation vs 10.5.1/Xcode 3.0?

2008-02-07 Thread Rainer Müller
James Berry wrote: I guess a positive to the code is that it does for Leopard provide enable at least minimal MacPorts usage if PATH isn't set, and also gets MANPATH set, which unfortunately doesn't happen by default on Leopard. So users will keep it that way and install additional software fr

Re: macports installation vs 10.5.1/Xcode 3.0?

2008-02-07 Thread James Berry
On Feb 7, 2008, at 9:28 AM, Anders F Björklund wrote: Rainer Müller wrote: Paths in /etc/manpaths.d and /etc/paths.d are always added at the end of MANPATH and PATH. Therefore, installs by MacPorts will not override the default Mac OS X installation. As it is not possible to prepend ne

Re: gnucash won't build with guile16 and won't run with guile (1.8)

2008-02-07 Thread Jeffrey Goldberg
On Feb 7, 2008, at 9:08 AM, Triston Whetten wrote: Take a gander at http://trac.macports.org/projects/macports/ticket/13472 . Thank you. I had tried to search the bug reports before posting, but I must have done something silly in my search. Cheers, -j smime.p7s Description: S/MIME c

Re: macports installation vs 10.5.1/Xcode 3.0?

2008-02-07 Thread Anders F Björklund
Rainer Müller wrote: Paths in /etc/manpaths.d and /etc/paths.d are always added at the end of MANPATH and PATH. Therefore, installs by MacPorts will not override the default Mac OS X installation. As it is not possible to prepend new paths, this option is rather useless for us. I think

Re: Is HFS really "scary"?

2008-02-07 Thread Jochem Huhmann
On 2008-02-07, at 16:53, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: On Feb 7, 2008, at 2:45 AM, Jochem Huhmann wrote: There's no way to take that further (in the file system) by integrating even more useful fuzziness like recognizing "f" for "ph", or ignoring accents or whatever. If you're dealing with i

Re: Patching configure - Or Not

2008-02-07 Thread Rainer Müller
Michael Franz wrote: Since I cannot figure out how to get aclocal, automake and autoconf to run in the pre-configure step I have to patch configure. What about: use_automake yes use_autoconf yes http://guide.macports.org/#reference.phases.configure.automake-autoconf Rainer ___

Re: "The following install step failed: run postflight script for MacPorts-1.6.0."

2008-02-07 Thread Stefan Schwarzer
You need to open a specific port. I think it's 873. Stef Hello, I have the same problem as described. I'm on Leopard. I have "bash" output for "basename $SHELL" command. It seems correct. MANPATH is correct if I try to get it through env command. DISPLAY variable is DISPLAY=/tmp/launch-hpEjq8

Re: gnucash won't build with guile16 and won't run with guile (1.8)

2008-02-07 Thread Lenore Horner
I have it running on a PowerBook G4 with 10.4.11. I don't have much installed but Gnucash and Gimp. I haven't been replying, because I had to ask for help to get one or the other to install, but don't remember what I actually had to do. Gnucash is out of date so there is a bug you may run

Re: macports installation vs 10.5.1/Xcode 3.0?

2008-02-07 Thread Rainer Müller
Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Feb 6, 2008, at 18:47, Jeffrey Goldberg wrote: Ah. I don't know what the "right" way of doing things is, but after poking around I added a file, /etc/manpaths.d/Macports the contents of which are /opt/local/share/man which seemed to solve that problem for me. Woul

Re: Is HFS really "scary"?

2008-02-07 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
On Feb 7, 2008, at 2:45 AM, Jochem Huhmann wrote: There's no way to take that further (in the file system) by integrating even more useful fuzziness like recognizing "f" for "ph", or ignoring accents or whatever. If you're dealing with international users a case insensitive file system may

Re: gnucash won't build with guile16 and won't run with guile (1.8)

2008-02-07 Thread Triston Whetten
Take a gander at http://trac.macports.org/projects/macports/ticket/ 13472. Triston. On Feb 7, 2008, at 8:54 AM, Mike Procario wrote: On 2/7/08, Jeffrey Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: When I get a chance later today, I'll submit a proper bug report, but I wanted to know if anyone has

Re: gnucash won't build with guile16 and won't run with guile (1.8)

2008-02-07 Thread Mike Procario
On 2/7/08, Jeffrey Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > When I get a chance later today, I'll submit a proper bug report, but > I wanted to know if anyone has gnucash from macports running. > > To briefly summarize, when I install guile and slib-guile and build > gnucash with > > -guile16 +w

Re: Patching configure - Or Not

2008-02-07 Thread Daniel J. Luke
On Feb 6, 2008, at 10:33 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Michael> I need to change the way configure works for a port. Is it Michael> better to patch configure or change the underlying files and Michael> regenerate configure? Patching configure is going to be very fragile. Your patch

gnucash won't build with guile16 and won't run with guile (1.8)

2008-02-07 Thread Jeffrey Goldberg
When I get a chance later today, I'll submit a proper bug report, but I wanted to know if anyone has gnucash from macports running. To briefly summarize, when I install guile and slib-guile and build gnucash with -guile16 +without_docs gnucash builds fine, but fails on start-up with a s

Re: Is HFS really "scary"?

2008-02-07 Thread Triston Whetten
NTFS is case insensitive and case preserving by default, but can be made case sensitive. Take SFU (Services For Unix) that runs on win32 systems. It shows some of the technical ability of windows (though I'm no fan of Windows). It runs as a peer to the win32 subsystem (not on top of it

Re: Is HFS really "scary"?

2008-02-07 Thread Tabitha McNerney
On 2/7/08, Jochem Huhmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 2008-02-06, at 21:13, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > > That's probably never going to happen. When you're dealing with > > grandma on the phone and she's saying "I can't open my file named > > ``fluffy!''", the last thing you need is to g

Re: Is HFS really "scary"?

2008-02-07 Thread Jochem Huhmann
On 2008-02-06, at 21:13, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: That's probably never going to happen. When you're dealing with grandma on the phone and she's saying "I can't open my file named ``fluffy!''", the last thing you need is to go 10 rounds trying to figure out whether she actually named it F

Re: Is HFS really "scary"?

2008-02-07 Thread Jeroen van der Ham
Heh, I tried running a case-sensitive file system for a while, and with Leopard I took the opportunity to switch back. It's a hellish experience if you expect things to "just work". The problem is really that applications break spectacularly when they run into such an issue, and the only way t

Re: gpgme variant for mutt-devel?

2008-02-07 Thread Christoph Ludwig
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 08:08:12PM +0100, Christoph Ludwig wrote: > On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 12:50:20PM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Jan 2, 2008, at 02:18, Christoph Ludwig wrote: > > >I have a request: I'd be grateful if support for mutt's gpgme > > >crypto backend > > >was added to the port

Re: libIDL woes

2008-02-07 Thread William Davis
On Feb 6, 2008, at 8:17 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Feb 6, 2008, at 19:12, David Rowe wrote: Ryan Schmidt wrote: The libidl bug is a different and unrelated bug. libidl is unmaintained so someone will have to volunteer to figure out what's breaking, and how to fix it. Actually, Tod Morri