Re: Question about build dependencies

2008-05-29 Thread Tabitha McNerney
Ryan and friends, I really love the MacPorts community. Really, I mean that. It's one of the most enjoyable groups of people even though we have never met in person and even though we each contribute in different ways. Thank you to everyone for the various contributions and for making MacPorts way

Re: Question about build dependencies

2008-05-29 Thread Tabitha McNerney
Ryan, A follow-up question if you don't mind (I had to walk away from the computer to think and then come back to this). In the example you gave of: The dependency is declared like this: depends_build \ bin:gperf:gperf That means if a binary (the bin part) called gperf (the first gperf

Re: Question about build dependencies

2008-05-29 Thread Rainer Müller
Ryan Schmidt wrote: Unless you've overridden this path by setting binpath in the macports.conf. (This is only available in MacPorts trunk, not in MacPorts 1.6.0.) This is already available in 1.6.0, but it was not documented. For libraries, I'm not sure where the code is that searches,

Re: Question about build dependencies

2008-05-29 Thread Joshua Root
Ryan Schmidt wrote: On May 29, 2008, at 07:43, Tabitha McNerney wrote: For example, it might be a good idea to try and have as many dependencies for ports (whether build, run or library) be based on other ports rather than what Apple provides on the root filesystem because Apple can

Re: Ruby installation damaged: how to deactivate/uninstall/update?

2008-05-29 Thread febeling
Tobias Weisserth wrote: I am having trouble with my Ruby installation from MacPorts. This is what I have installed: Installed Versions: 1.8.6-p110_0+thread_hooks 1.8.6-p111_1+thread_hooks Active Version: 1.8.6-p111_1+thread_hooks Now I want to uninstall the deactivated version

Re: Apache not starting at boot

2008-05-29 Thread Lorin Rivers
That worked! Thanks Robert. On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Lorin Rivers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, thanks, I'll try the unload/load mambo and see what happens On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Robert Liesenfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On May 19, 2008, at 8:14 AM, Lorin Rivers

error: mozilla (via kazehakase), port 1.6, OS X 10.4.11, Xcode 2.5, x86

2008-05-29 Thread Justin Corn
Trying to install kazehakase, I get the following error while building mozilla (using port 1.6, OS X 10.4.11, Xcode 2.5, Intel arch) nmedit -s ../../../build/unix/gnu-ld-scripts/components-export-list libp3p.dylib nmedit: can't make global coalesced symbols (like __ZN10nsIDOMAttr6GetIIDEv) into

Re: error: mozilla (via kazehakase), port 1.6, OS X 10.4.11, Xcode 2.5, x86

2008-05-29 Thread Joshua Root
Justin Corn wrote: Trying to install kazehakase, I get the following error while building mozilla (using port 1.6, OS X 10.4.11, Xcode 2.5, Intel arch) Mozilla is pretty old. Try installing kazehakase with the seamonkey variant. - Josh ___

Apple did it again!

2008-05-29 Thread John Korchok
Hi All, Once again, the latest security patch 2008-003 for Tiger broke our Apache 2 installation by replacing apachectl. Earlier posts on this topic are repeated below for any new listers: Subject: Tiger software update replaces apachectl I found out (the hard way) that the latest Apple

Re: Question about build dependencies

2008-05-29 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On May 29, 2008, at 09:00, Joshua Root wrote: So yes, the dependency should probably be changed to port:gperf for all platforms. :-) Done! ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org

Re: Apple did it again!

2008-05-29 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 29May2008 19:53, John Korchok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Once again, the latest security patch 2008-003 for Tiger broke our Apache 2 | installation by replacing apachectl. Earlier posts on this topic are | repeated below for any new listers: | | Subject: Tiger software update replaces

Re: Apple did it again!

2008-05-29 Thread Rainer Müller
Cameron Simpson wrote: Yes, I feel your pain - I have a similar issue on another platform with another vendor. But it's not the vendor's fault, nor their problem. You and I have hacked in the vendor's playground, and it's our problem to make those hacks persist. I think we all agree on this.

Re: Apple did it again!

2008-05-29 Thread Alakazam
Hi ! On 30 mai 08, at 02:46, Rainer Müller wrote: Cameron Simpson wrote: Yes, I feel your pain - I have a similar issue on another platform with another vendor. But it's not the vendor's fault, nor their problem. You and I have hacked in the vendor's playground, and it's our problem

Re: Apple did it again!

2008-05-29 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On May 29, 2008, at 19:49, Alakazam wrote: On 30 mai 08, at 02:46, Rainer Müller wrote: Cameron Simpson wrote: Yes, I feel your pain - I have a similar issue on another platform with another vendor. But it's not the vendor's fault, nor their problem. You and I have hacked in the vendor's

Re: Apple did it again!

2008-05-29 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 30May2008 02:46, Rainer M?ller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Cameron Simpson wrote: Yes, I feel your pain - I have a similar issue on another platform with another vendor. But it's not the vendor's fault, nor their problem. You and I have hacked in the vendor's playground, and it's our problem

Re: Apple did it again!

2008-05-29 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 29May2008 20:12, Ryan Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | I would like to suggest migrating John's initial summary to a Howto | (and am ready to do so based on your work), if that seems appropriate. | | The reason for the hack is to let System Preferences Sharing Web | Sharing control the

RE: Apple did it again!

2008-05-29 Thread John Korchok
I most definitely am not blaming Apple for this and apologize for a misleading subject line. I am just trying to alert users who might be in the same boat. You apply a security patch and your web server goes wonky, it's not immediately apparent what the connection is. John -Original

Re: Apple did it again!

2008-05-29 Thread Alakazam
Yes. I also would appreciate a clear HOWTO for that kind of thing, being new to Macs and already missing the simple (and sometimes simplistic) / etc/init.d scheme common on other platforms:-) As Ryan indicated (and I agree that hacking the Apple provided services is not very good

Re: Apple did it again!

2008-05-29 Thread Rainer Müller
Ryan Schmidt wrote: I don't think I like that hack very much. Wouldn't it be better to write up how to install a 3rd-party launchctl manager which you could use to start and stop all MacPorts-supplied startup services? There is 'port load/unload' on trunk which basically does this. It is

Re: Apple did it again!

2008-05-29 Thread Chris Janton
On 2008-05-29 , at 18:12 , Ryan Schmidt wrote: I don't think I like that hack very much. Wouldn't it be better to write up how to install a 3rd-party launchctl manager which you could use to start and stop all MacPorts-supplied startup services? Go to this webpage

Re: Apple did it again!

2008-05-29 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On May 29, 2008, at 20:23, Chris Janton wrote: On 2008-05-29 , at 18:12 , Ryan Schmidt wrote: I don't think I like that hack very much. Wouldn't it be better to write up how to install a 3rd-party launchctl manager which you could use to start and stop all MacPorts-supplied startup

Re: Apple did it again!

2008-05-29 Thread Rainer Müller
Ryan Schmidt wrote: Right, lingon, that's the name I couldn't think of. We could write up something on our web site about using that. Sounds like a good idea. We already have a port for it... http://db.macports.org/port/show/4001 Hm, the description of this port is wrong. Actually

Re: Apple did it again!

2008-05-29 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
Never mind on this - I just read the follow-ups. I still think this is a really dangerous thing to do, but since the original poster realizes this also, I'll not belabor the point. - Jordan On May 29, 2008, at 7:35 PM, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: I'm not sure I understand what point you're

Re: Apple did it again!

2008-05-29 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On May 29, 2008, at 20:37, Rainer Müller wrote: Ryan Schmidt wrote: Right, lingon, that's the name I couldn't think of. We could write up something on our web site about using that. Sounds like a good idea. We already have a port for it... http://db.macports.org/port/show/4001 Hm,

Re: Several errors building gnutls

2008-05-29 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On May 17, 2008, at 14:27, Brian P. Flaherty wrote: On Wed, 14 May 2008, Chris Pickel wrote: If you're concerned about your MacPorts installation, the best thing to do would be to remove the configure args you added, then `sudo port - f configure libgcrypt`, and find config.log in

Octave 3.0.1 plotting is very slow

2008-05-29 Thread Jerry
I noticed that plotting with the new Octave version 3.0.1 on Macports is very slow compared to older versions of Octave, e.g. 2.1.71. In the old Octave, small plots appear instantaneously, probably before the Return key hits its stop. In Octave 3.0.1, there is a lag of about a

Re: Question about build dependencies

2008-05-29 Thread Tabitha McNerney
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Ryan Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On May 29, 2008, at 09:00, Joshua Root wrote: So yes, the dependency should probably be changed to port:gperf for all platforms. :-) Done! Wow, I'm glad that my questions trickled down to an improvement. What a

Re: Question about build dependencies

2008-05-29 Thread Rainer Müller
Tabitha McNerney wrote: I have what might seem to be a dumb question. I noticed today that the MacPort named libiconv version 1.12 has a build dependency on another port named gperf, specifically: $ port deps libiconv libiconv has build dependencies on: gperf Just as

Re: Question about build dependencies

2008-05-29 Thread Tabitha McNerney
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 7:00 PM, Rainer Müller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tabitha McNerney wrote: I have what might seem to be a dumb question. I noticed today that the MacPort named libiconv version 1.12 has a build dependency on another port named gperf, specifically: $ port deps