On Jun 5, 2008, at 00:10, Brian Flaherty wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 10:18:30PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> On May 17, 2008, at 14:27, Brian P. Flaherty wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 14 May 2008, Chris Pickel wrote:
>>>
If you're concerned about your MacPorts installation, the best
th
On 04/06/2008, at 9:05 AM, Rainer Müller wrote:
> Already possible:
> $ sudo port mirror installed
> $ sudo portmirror
On 10.5.3 with macports 1.6,
$ sudo pormirror
outputs:
can't read "0": no such variable
while executing
"exec /usr/bin/tclsh "$0" "$@""
(file "/opt/local/b
On Jun 4, 2008, at 10:06, Joerg van den Hoff wrote:
> I'm back to field one: due to your above news, I just did:
>
> port clean --all libssh
> port uninstall hydra #this was the old (working) version
> without ssh support
> port clean --all hydra
> port selfupdate
> port sync
> port install
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 05:14:53AM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Jun 4, 2008, at 04:24, Joerg van den Hoff wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 02:53:15PM -0700, Matrix Mole wrote:
> >>(sorry forgot to Reply-to-all on the original message to include the
> >>mailing list)
> >>
> >>On Tue, Jun 3
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 05:14:53AM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Jun 4, 2008, at 04:24, Joerg van den Hoff wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 02:53:15PM -0700, Matrix Mole wrote:
> >>(sorry forgot to Reply-to-all on the original message to include the
> >>mailing list)
> >>
> >>On Tue, Jun 3
On Jun 4, 2008, at 04:24, Joerg van den Hoff wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 02:53:15PM -0700, Matrix Mole wrote:
>> (sorry forgot to Reply-to-all on the original message to include the
>> mailing list)
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Joerg van den Hoff
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 02:53:15PM -0700, Matrix Mole wrote:
> (sorry forgot to Reply-to-all on the original message to include the
> mailing list)
>
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Joerg van den Hoff
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Also, be sure to run a port sync to get the most recent vers
On Jun 3, 2008, at 2:10 AM, Alakazam wrote:
>>> - What version of Mac OS X are you running ?
>> 10.5.11
>
> Is that 10.4.11 or 10.5.3 ? Anyway, this obviously does not change
> anything, since we obtain similar results on the performance tests.
Oops. 10.4.11.
>
>
> I think it would be best t
