Re: Image error: /opt/local/bin/a2p is being used by the active perl5.8 port

2008-12-07 Thread Marcus Calhoun-Lopez
Admin enabled.com> writes: > > > Hi there, > > I am getting an image error: "Image error: /opt/local/bin/a2p is being > used by the active perl5.8 port" This was a bug in the perl5 Portfile, but hopefully it is fixed now. See http://trac.macports.org/ticket/16830 for the gory details. After

Re: Problems linking against OSG on OS X Tiger (on a Power PC)

2008-12-07 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Dec 7, 2008, at 15:39, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Dec 7, 2008, at 09:57, Severin Kacianka wrote: I hope I do not ask a too obvious question, but I am just trying to get familiar with OSG and in the process want to be able to compile it on Linux and OS X. On Linux I have no problems compili

Re: Image error: /opt/local/bin/a2p is being used by the active perl5.8 port

2008-12-07 Thread Bryan Blackburn
On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 10:33:14PM -0800, Admin said: > > Hi there, > > I am getting an image error: "Image error: /opt/local/bin/a2p is being > used by the active perl5.8 port" > > The error message explains the trouble well but I dont really understand > how I can fix the problem. > > I want

Image error: /opt/local/bin/a2p is being used by the active perl5.8 port

2008-12-07 Thread Admin
Hi there, I am getting an image error: "Image error: /opt/local/bin/a2p is being used by the active perl5.8 port" The error message explains the trouble well but I dont really understand how I can fix the problem. I want the macports perl5.8 to be the active perl binary on my OSX machine

Re: macports 1.7.0 and gnome

2008-12-07 Thread William Davis
On Dec 7, 2008, at 6:36 PM, Joshua Root wrote: William Davis wrote: using MacPorts 1.7.0_rc1 to install gnome (sudo port -d install gnome) I got this error --> Activating gnome-session @2.24.1_0 Error: Target org.macports.activate returned: Image error: /opt/local/share/xsessions/gnome.desk

Re: macports 1.7.0 and gnome

2008-12-07 Thread Joshua Root
William Davis wrote: > using MacPorts 1.7.0_rc1 to install gnome (sudo port -d install gnome) I > got this error > --> Activating gnome-session @2.24.1_0 > Error: Target org.macports.activate returned: Image error: > /opt/local/share/xsessions/gnome.desktop is being used by the active gdm > port.

macports 1.7.0 and gnome

2008-12-07 Thread William Davis
using MacPorts 1.7.0_rc1 to install gnome (sudo port -d install gnome) I got this error --> Activating gnome-session @2.24.1_0 Error: Target org.macports.activate returned: Image error: /opt/local/ share/xsessions/gnome.desktop is being used by the active gdm port. Please deactivate this po

Re: Uninstall non-active packages

2008-12-07 Thread Joshua Root
Bart Masschelein wrote: > > On 07 Dec 2008, at 23:32, Joshua Root wrote: > >> Bart Masschelein wrote: >>> Hi Ryan, >>> >>> Not so sweet as you mention ;-). I get >>> >>> ---> Unable to uninstall perl5 5.8.8_0+darwin_9, the following ports >>> depend on it: >>> ---> autoconf >>> ---> au

Re: Uninstall non-active packages

2008-12-07 Thread Joshua Root
Bart Masschelein wrote: > > On 07 Dec 2008, at 23:30, Joshua Root wrote: > >> Bart Masschelein wrote: >>> Small side-question: why is 'inactive' not available from the >>> interactive console? >> >> I just tested, and it works in interactive mode. Note that 'inactive' >> specifies a set of ports,

Re: Uninstall non-active packages

2008-12-07 Thread Bart Masschelein
On 07 Dec 2008, at 23:32, Joshua Root wrote: Bart Masschelein wrote: Hi Ryan, Not so sweet as you mention ;-). I get ---> Unable to uninstall perl5 5.8.8_0+darwin_9, the following ports depend on it: ---> autoconf ---> automake Error: port uninstall failed: Please uninstall the po

Re: Uninstall non-active packages

2008-12-07 Thread Bart Masschelein
On 07 Dec 2008, at 23:30, Joshua Root wrote: Bart Masschelein wrote: Small side-question: why is 'inactive' not available from the interactive console? I just tested, and it works in interactive mode. Note that 'inactive' specifies a set of ports, it's not an action. So to see the list of in

Re: Uninstall non-active packages

2008-12-07 Thread Joshua Root
Bart Masschelein wrote: > Hi Ryan, > > Not so sweet as you mention ;-). I get > > ---> Unable to uninstall perl5 5.8.8_0+darwin_9, the following ports > depend on it: > ---> autoconf > ---> automake > Error: port uninstall failed: Please uninstall the ports that depend on > perl5 first

Re: Uninstall non-active packages

2008-12-07 Thread Joshua Root
Bart Masschelein wrote: > Small side-question: why is 'inactive' not available from the > interactive console? I just tested, and it works in interactive mode. Note that 'inactive' specifies a set of ports, it's not an action. So to see the list of inactive ports, you'd use "port echo inactive".

Re: Uninstall non-active packages

2008-12-07 Thread Bart Masschelein
Small side-question: why is 'inactive' not available from the interactive console? On 07 Dec 2008, at 22:40, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Dec 7, 2008, at 15:23, Bart Masschelein wrote: Is there a way to get a list of the non-active packages, so one could do sth like sudo port uninstall , or su

Re: Uninstall non-active packages

2008-12-07 Thread Bart Masschelein
Hi Ryan, Not so sweet as you mention ;-). I get ---> Unable to uninstall perl5 5.8.8_0+darwin_9, the following ports depend on it: ---> autoconf ---> automake Error: port uninstall failed: Please uninstall the ports that depend on perl5 first. I have 5.8.8_3 installed, wh

Re: Uninstall non-active packages

2008-12-07 Thread Bart Masschelein
Lucky I installed 1.7.0 half an hour ago then ;-). Will give it try... On 07 Dec 2008, at 22:40, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Dec 7, 2008, at 15:23, Bart Masschelein wrote: Is there a way to get a list of the non-active packages, so one could do sth like sudo port uninstall , or sudo port clean

Re: Uninstall non-active packages

2008-12-07 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Dec 7, 2008, at 15:23, Bart Masschelein wrote: Is there a way to get a list of the non-active packages, so one could do sth like sudo port uninstall , or sudo port clean ? I never use the -u option (read: I only recently discovered it, and will start using it from now one ;-)), hence I

Re: Problems linking against OSG on OS X Tiger (on a Power PC)

2008-12-07 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Dec 7, 2008, at 09:57, Severin Kacianka wrote: I hope I do not ask a too obvious question, but I am just trying to get familiar with OSG and in the process want to be able to compile it on Linux and OS X. On Linux I have no problems compiling a sample program like this: g++ -I /usr/loca

Uninstall non-active packages

2008-12-07 Thread Bart Masschelein
Hi all, Is there a way to get a list of the non-active packages, so one could do sth like sudo port uninstall , or sudo port clean ? I never use the -u option (read: I only recently discovered it, and will start using it from now one ;-)), hence I have a lot of non-active packages laying

Re: 1.7.0 release candidate 1 available for testing

2008-12-07 Thread William Davis
On Dec 7, 2008, at 2:10 PM, Joshua Root wrote: William Davis wrote: On Dec 7, 2008, at 6:27 AM, Joshua Root wrote: Hmm, looks like the attachment was scrubbed in the archives, so here's a link to the announcement on -dev:

Re: 1.7.0 release candidate 1 available for testing

2008-12-07 Thread Joshua Root
William Davis wrote: > > On Dec 7, 2008, at 6:27 AM, Joshua Root wrote: > >> Hmm, looks like the attachment was scrubbed in the archives, so here's a >> link to the announcement on -dev: >> >> >> >> >> - Josh >> __

Re: building apple-gcc42 fails: C compiler cannot create executables.

2008-12-07 Thread J.A. Neitzel
Timothy Goins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 7, 2008, at 6:22 AM, Admin wrote: > > > Hi there, > > > > I am not sure where to begin to troubleshoot this issue. Anybody > > know what to do here? Building apple-gcc42 fails. > > [snip] > I encountered this problem compiling 4.3. In /usr/b

Re: 1.7.0 release candidate 1 available for testing

2008-12-07 Thread William Davis
On Dec 7, 2008, at 6:27 AM, Joshua Root wrote: Hmm, looks like the attachment was scrubbed in the archives, so here's a link to the announcement on -dev: - Josh ___

Re: building apple-gcc42 fails: C compiler cannot create executables.

2008-12-07 Thread Joshua Root
Timothy Goins wrote: > I encountered this problem compiling 4.3. In //usr/bin/ I had the > /gcc/ executable but no gcc-4.0 file, so I created a link (/sudo ln -s > /usr/bin/gcc /usr/bin/gcc-4.0/). The /-s/ is unnecessary, I believe, > but I did it because my symbolic links show up in a different

Re: building apple-gcc42 fails: C compiler cannot create executables.

2008-12-07 Thread Timothy Goins
I encountered this problem compiling 4.3. In /usr/bin I had the gcc executable but no gcc-4.0 file, so I created a link (sudo ln -s /usr/ bin/gcc /usr/bin/gcc-4.0). The -s is unnecessary, I believe, but I did it because my symbolic links show up in a different color. What I don't know why

Problems linking against OSG on OS X Tiger (on a Power PC)

2008-12-07 Thread Severin Kacianka
Hello, I posted this question also on the osg-users mailing list, but it just occoured to me, that it may be more appropriate to post it here. Sorry for the cross posting :( Message: I hope I do not ask a too obvious question, but I am just trying to get familiar with OSG and in the process

Re: building apple-gcc42 fails: C compiler cannot create executables.

2008-12-07 Thread Joshua Root
Admin wrote: > Hi there, > > I am not sure where to begin to troubleshoot this issue. Anybody know > what to do here? Building apple-gcc42 fails. > > > sh-3.2# port install apple-gcc42 > ---> Configuring apple-gcc42 > Error: Target org.macports.configure returned: configure failure: shell > c

Re: panther - php5 upgrade - i'm confused

2008-12-07 Thread Chris Janton
On 2008-12-06 , at 12:24 , Ryan Schmidt wrote: Why does the php5 upgrade "install" apache2? I don't know... I didn't change anything in the dependencies recently. I'll test on my Panther machine later. I notice you have the apache port installed. Are you currently using php5 with that ap

Re: port upgrade installed fails: Can't map the URL 'file://.' to a port description file

2008-12-07 Thread Rainer Müller
Admin wrote: > sh-3.2# /opt/local/bin/port upgrade installed Usually it is better to use 'upgrade outdated'. > Can't map the URL 'file://.' to a port description file ("Could not find > Portfile in /Users/"). > Please verify that the directory and portfile syntax are correct. > To use the curren

port upgrade installed fails: Can't map the URL 'file://.' to a port description file

2008-12-07 Thread Admin
Hi there, might somebody have a clue as to what is going on here? I am running macports on a dual G5 with 10.5.5 I replaced my home directory path in the error message with sh-3.2# /opt/local/bin/port upgrade installed Can't map the URL 'file://.' to a port description file ("Could not find P

building apple-gcc42 fails: C compiler cannot create executables.

2008-12-07 Thread Admin
Hi there, I am not sure where to begin to troubleshoot this issue. Anybody know what to do here? Building apple-gcc42 fails. sh-3.2# port install apple-gcc42 ---> Configuring apple-gcc42 Error: Target org.macports.configure returned: configure failure: shell command " cd "/opt/local/var/

Re: 1.7.0 release candidate 1 available for testing

2008-12-07 Thread Joshua Root
Hmm, looks like the attachment was scrubbed in the archives, so here's a link to the announcement on -dev: - Josh ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosfo

1.7.0 release candidate 1 available for testing

2008-12-07 Thread Joshua Root
Forwarding to macports-users for wider exposure. :-) - Josh --- Begin Message --- >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 7 20:44:49 2008 Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.root.id.au (123-243-246-165.tpgi.com.au [123.243