>> Does MacPorts have the equivalent of "make -k", to install, and keep
>> on going when one dependency fails?
>
> $ man port
> ...
> -p Despite any errors encountered, proceed to process
> multiple ports and commands.
>
> That should handle it.
I thought -p meant: If I have three comman
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Mar 16, 2010, at 03:46, Carsten Bessing wrote:
>
> > Amazing - to get help even before I have figured out how to ask for it
> :-)
> >
> > I had exactly this problem, now it seems there is a solution.
> >
> > But I'm afraid this is out of
It looks like all is well now. I applied the 'perl5 +perl5_10' variant
then inadvertently uninstalled a number of ports while trying to fix
the issue. I reinstalled most (the ones I thought I needed) and
removed darcs. Lastly, I ran the following . . .
sudo port sync; sudo port selfupdate ;
You have likely found a bug (ports that need perl should almost always be OK
with either perl 5.10 or 5.8 being installed and shouldn't need the other one).
I don't know of a better way of figuring out which port is causing you the
problem other than manually.
Take the output of 'port outdated'
To make it interesting I ran the dependents command:
@naiad ~] port dependents perl5.8
perl5.8 has no dependents!
Hmmm...
On Mar 17, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Matrix Mole wrote:
I don't know much about perl myself, so I'm just tossing out basic
troubleshooting with what little information I do know
I don't know much about perl myself, so I'm just tossing out basic
troubleshooting with what little information I do know about the port
system itself.
You can run 'port dependents perl5.8' to find out what on your system
still needs it. I can see that perl5 has a perl5_10 variant, and also
that o
I'm running Macports Perl v5.10.1. I do not have a 5.8 variant
installed (other than Apple's). When I ran an update this morning
Macports tries to install 5.8.9_3, which of course, fails to install/
activate. I'm not certain what is dependent upon 5.8.9 but would
rather see everything bumped
1. Snow Leopard v. 10.6.2.
2. New install of MacPorts - package installed with no errors.
3. Ran: port -d selfupdate
4. Got:
--
dlopen(/opt/local/share/macports/Tcl/pextlib1.0/Pextlib.dylib, 10): no
suitable image found. Did find:
/opt/local/share/macports/Tcl/pextlib1.0/Pextlib.dylib: n
Dear MacPorts and digiKam users,
just a few minutes ago, and before reading this message thread, I
posted a ticket about an issue I had when I tried to update digiKam:
https://trac.macports.org/ticket/24090
Carsten, it was your post to the digiKam users list, that reminded me I
still wanted publ
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 03:03, Michael_google gmail_Gersten
wrote:
> Does MacPorts have the equivalent of "make -k", to install, and keep
> on going when one dependency fails?
$ man port
...
-p Despite any errors encountered, proceed to process
multiple ports and commands.
That should
On Mar 16, 2010, at 12:24, LuKreme wrote:
> On 15-Mar-2010, at 01:49, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> Sorry, ImageMagick cannot be built universal when you use the +gs variant,
>> because as you've noticed ghostscript does not have a universal variant.
>
> So, short answer is you can't build GhostSc
On Mar 16, 2010, at 12:47, Marko Käning wrote:
> Shall I file a bug on bugtracker for this one here?
>
> (Obviously KDE has a problem with the supplied zlib library...)
I'll fix this in zlib shortly; this is:
http://trac.macports.org/ticket/24067
_
On Mar 16, 2010, at 20:19, Scott Haneda wrote:
> My first time using port_cutleaves:
[snip]
> Both of those are normal software, active, and software I use on a regular
> basis, is this telling me it would remove it?
Yes it would remove those ports if you answered "u" for uninstall instead of
On Mar 17, 2010, at 01:19, Claus wrote:
> I am trying to install py26-wxpython. I get an error message which doesn't
> tell me much. Does anyone have an idea?
http://trac.macports.org/ticket/23847
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.
On Mar 17, 2010, at 03:22 , Joshua Root wrote:
On 2010-3-17 18:03 , Michael_google gmail_Gersten wrote:
Does MacPorts have the equivalent of "make -k", to install, and keep
on going when one dependency fails?
They wouldn't be dependencies if you could install without them...
make -k doesn't
On 2010-3-17 18:03 , Michael_google gmail_Gersten wrote:
> Does MacPorts have the equivalent of "make -k", to install, and keep
> on going when one dependency fails?
They wouldn't be dependencies if you could install without them...
That said, there's the -p option which will continue processing
Does MacPorts have the equivalent of "make -k", to install, and keep
on going when one dependency fails?
--
Economic and political blog of a strict constitutionalist
http://StrictConstitution.BlogSpot.com
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@l
17 matches
Mail list logo
