Re: amarok

On Aug 3, 2010, at 01:14, Scott Webster wrote: > On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> >> Correct; there is no "amarok" in your PATH, nor, I'm guessing, is there >> expected to be; you're expected to launch Amarok.app by double-clicking. > > A minor point, but you should be abl

Re: amarok

On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > Correct; there is no "amarok" in your PATH, nor, I'm guessing, is there > expected to be; you're expected to launch Amarok.app by double-clicking. > A minor point, but you should be able to launch .app programs with the open command, eg. "o

Re: trac.macports.org/ticket/25815

On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 10:23 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Aug 2, 2010, at 21:16, Jeff Singleton wrote: > >> Agreed .. It is this error from the config.err file: >> >>       gcc-4.0: -E, -S, -save-temps and -M options are not allowed >> with multiple -arch flags >> >> I hit this with wxWidgets-de

Re: trac.macports.org/ticket/25815

On Aug 2, 2010, at 21:16, Jeff Singleton wrote: > Agreed .. It is this error from the config.err file: > > gcc-4.0: -E, -S, -save-temps and -M options are not allowed > with multiple -arch flags > > I hit this with wxWidgets-devel when trying to build universal...my > guess there are some

Re: trac.macports.org/ticket/25815

Agreed .. It is this error from the config.err file: gcc-4.0: -E, -S, -save-temps and -M options are not allowed with multiple -arch flags I hit this with wxWidgets-devel when trying to build universal...my guess there are some dependencies that need to be rebuilt with universal. I'm back

Re: Installing wine (was: MACPORTS Error !)

On Aug 2, 2010, at 20:00, Maria T wrote: > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Maria T > To: macports-...@lists.macosforge.org > Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 20:50:55 -0400 > Subject: Re: [MacPorts] #25924: Problem getting macports to work ! > Actually, i was a bit off topic.. i have been on

Re: amarok

On Aug 2, 2010, at 12:19, Maxime.7259 wrote: > I installed macports and Amarok this week-end. > I had to go throught the process a couple of times so it would find all the > dependancies. It should not have been necessary to "sudo port install" more than once. If you tell us more about the dep

Re: xordg-libXi -> gtk2, texlive xcommon etc... why ?

On Aug 2, 2010, at 12:30, Erwan David wrote: > upgrading my ports I fnd that the upgrade of xorg-libXi wants to install > whole gtk, a part of texlive, etc.. > > Hpow can I stop this madness ?, How can I go back removing all the > dependencies it installed ? > > How can I see the whole dependen

Re: Questions about Perl and Python

On Aug 2, 2010, at 1:43 PM, Rodolfo Aramayo wrote: > Is there any way for me to tell MacPorts to use the Perl and Python > installations that come with MacOSX10.6? instead of installing their own? > Do we have any choice in this? No. Refer to [1] for the answer why. [1] http://trac.macports.or

Re: xordg-libXi -> gtk2, texlive xcommon etc... why ?

On 02/08/10 21:32, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2010-08-02 20:14:21 +0200, Erwan David wrote: >> It keeps the problem of cairo, pango, gtk2, etc... >> do they come because of texlive ? > > There's a dependency texlive -> texlive-bin-extra -> texlive-bin -> > poppler -> gtk2 -> pango -> cairo. > O

Questions about Perl and Python

Is there any way for me to tell MacPorts to use the Perl and Python installations that come with MacOSX10.6? instead of installing their own? Do we have any choice in this? Thanks ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://

Re: xordg-libXi -> gtk2, texlive xcommon etc... why ?

On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Erwan David wrote: > How can I see the whole dependency tree to see why I get this ? > See the "port deps" and "port rdeps" commands, possibly with the --full switch. Info in the man page. You should also be able to use the -y "dry run" option of see what will h

Re: xordg-libXi -> gtk2, texlive xcommon etc... why ?

On 2010-08-02 20:14:21 +0200, Erwan David wrote: > It keeps the problem of cairo, pango, gtk2, etc... > do they come because of texlive ? There's a dependency texlive -> texlive-bin-extra -> texlive-bin -> poppler -> gtk2 -> pango -> cairo. -- Vincent Lefèvre - Web: 100

Re: xordg-libXi -> gtk2, texlive xcommon etc... why ?

Le Mon 2/08/2010, Vincent Lefevre disait > On 2010-08-02 19:30:02 +0200, Erwan David wrote: > > upgrading my ports I fnd that the upgrade of xorg-libXi wants to install > > whole gtk, a part of texlive, etc.. > > The reason is xmlto, which has more dependencies than needed: > > Runtime Dependenc

Re: xordg-libXi -> gtk2, texlive xcommon etc... why ?

On 2010-08-02 19:30:02 +0200, Erwan David wrote: > upgrading my ports I fnd that the upgrade of xorg-libXi wants to install > whole gtk, a part of texlive, etc.. The reason is xmlto, which has more dependencies than needed: Runtime Dependencies: coreutils, findutils, getopt, libpaper, texlive,

xordg-libXi -> gtk2, texlive xcommon etc... why ?

upgrading my ports I fnd that the upgrade of xorg-libXi wants to install whole gtk, a part of texlive, etc.. Hpow can I stop this madness ?, How can I go back removing all the dependencies it installed ? How can I see the whole dependency tree to see why I get this ? ANd how can I say : never in

amarok

Hello, I have been using linux for quite a while. I switched to mac a year ago. but I miss Amarok. I installed macports and Amarok this week-end. I had to go throught the process a couple of times so it would find all the dependancies. then I got:

Re: Building libvpx Error

I hit this error too ... I solved it doing a port -vfnR on the two ports that are required to build libvpx, and then it seemed to work. On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Aug 1, 2010, at 06:47, mieru mieru wrote: > >> Hi everybody, i'm new to this list but i'have been usi

Re: Huge system slowdown while installing ports

Just a shot in the dark ... but are you running Intego Virus Barrier X6? Or one of Intego's other security apps? If you are ... make sure to add your Macports folder to the exempt (Do not Scan in Real Time) listas Realtime monitoring from Intego will cause exactly the issues you are stating.

Re: gedit - version bump ?

On Aug 2, 2010, at 4:38 AM, Asbjørn Laurberg wrote: > Are there any plans to upgrade the gedit port? Version 2.26.3 is rather old > ... There is already a ticket filed about this [1]. The maintainer has not responded. [1] Cheers! Frank _

Re: Odd upgrade behavior

On 2010-8-2 03:09 , Arno Hautala wrote: > Is this the expected behavior for "port upgrade --enforce-variants outdated"? > > ---> Computing dependencies for dblatex > ---> Dependencies to be installed: ImageMagick > ... > ---> Staging ImageMagick into destroot > ---> Packaging tbz2 archive

Re: Previously requested variants removed when upgrading with --enforce-variants

On 2010-8-2 08:00 , Scott Webster wrote: > Should you normally have to pass the --enforce-variants switch when > you just want to upgrade everything outdated though? No. You only need to use --enforce-variants when you want to add or remove a variant on a non-outdated port. So unless you're specif

gedit - version bump ?

Hi, Are there any plans to upgrade the gedit port? Version 2.26.3 is rather old ... Regards, Asbjoern Laurberg ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users

Re: trac.macports.org/ticket/25815

On 2010-08-02 05:53 , t...@qx.net wrote: > -- > 22:30> sudo port build libvpx > ---> Computing dependencies for libvpx > ---> Configuring libvpx > Error: Target org.macports.configure returned: configure failure: shell > command failed > Lo

Re: Creating .pkg

2010/8/1 Scott Webster > On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Lorenzo Pii > wrote: > > > > How do people builds drag and drop apps then? > > > > You should respond to the list too, since then others can help provide > an answer. > > In this case, I don't know, since I don't do it myself! Perhaps >