On 07.12.2010, at 21:58, Konrad Hinsen wrote:
> Somewhat by accident I noticed an enormous speed difference in basic NumPy
> operations between my MacPorts installation (py26-numpy) and the NumPy 1.5.1
> binaries from the NumPy sourceforge site used with MacPython 2.6, also
> downloaded as a bi
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 23:02, Konrad Hinsen wrote:
> My installation uses the default, gcc 4.4, and my numbers are for a MacBook
> Pro running at 2.53 GHz.
>
> Does gcc-4.2 mean you used the gcc from Apple's Xcode package?
Even though you are using the gcc44 variant only the fortran compiler
fr
On Dec 7, 2010, at 10:02 PM, Konrad Hinsen wrote:
> On 08.12.2010, at 00:31, Frank Schima wrote:
>
>> Wow, interesting result. I just ran the benchmark on my Mac Pro 2008 and got
>> 44 s with py26-numpy. I rebuilt it just to take a look. I noticed it is
>> using -O3 in the configure flags which
On 08.12.2010, at 00:31, Frank Schima wrote:
> Wow, interesting result. I just ran the benchmark on my Mac Pro 2008 and got
> 44 s with py26-numpy. I rebuilt it just to take a look. I noticed it is using
> -O3 in the configure flags which is good, but it was using gcc-4.2 to build.
> I have the
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 17:31, Frank Schima wrote:
> Wow, interesting result. I just ran the benchmark on my Mac Pro 2008 and got
> 44 s with py26-numpy. I rebuilt it just to take a look. I noticed it is using
> -O3 in the configure flags which is good, but it was using gcc-4.2 to build.
> I ha
In article ,
Konrad Hinsen wrote:
> Somewhat by accident I noticed an enormous speed difference in basic NumPy
> operations between my MacPorts installation (py26-numpy) and the NumPy 1.5.1
> binaries from the NumPy sourceforge site used with MacPython 2.6, also
> downloaded as a binary.
>
>
On Dec 7, 2010, at 1:58 PM, Konrad Hinsen wrote:
> Somewhat by accident I noticed an enormous speed difference in basic NumPy
> operations between my MacPorts installation (py26-numpy) and the NumPy 1.5.1
> binaries from the NumPy sourceforge site used with MacPython 2.6, also
> downloaded as
Somewhat by accident I noticed an enormous speed difference in basic NumPy
operations between my MacPorts installation (py26-numpy) and the NumPy 1.5.1
binaries from the NumPy sourceforge site used with MacPython 2.6, also
downloaded as a binary.
~/projects/solar_system> /usr/local/bin/python b
Hi David,
On 07.12.2010, at 02:22, David Rappoport wrote:
>
> Finally trying to run kile I get the following error (without sudo no error
> but does not run either)
>
> # sudo /Applications/MacPorts/KDE4/kile.app/Contents/MacOS/kile
> Dynamic session lookup supported but failed: launchd did not
