On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 21:20, Andrew Watts wrote:
>
> Could it be a 32-bit / 64-bit issue?
Maybe? I'm on i386 and have:
> $ /usr/bin/file /usr/bin/file /opt/local/bin/file
> /usr/bin/file: Mach-O universal binary with 2 architectures
> /usr/bin/file (for architecture x86_64): Mach-O
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 19:34, Dan Ports wrote:
>
> Yes, I'm also confused by this. It's possible to have multiple versions
> of perl5 installed, but as far as I can tell modules can only be
> installed for one of them -- whichever one was installed as
> $prefix/bin/perl at the time the moduls wer
I just tried uninstalling & reinstalling 5.05, and I'm getting the
same behavior. I get identical results to yours from the "file -l"
commands.
Curiously, it's also not recognizing binaries (like its own) as Mach-O
executables. file `which file` is giving me "data".
It does recognize things lik
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 19:22, Andrew Watts wrote:
> It appears that version 5.05 of file is not recognizing MP3 files. On
> my mac, running 10.5.8, I get this:
I'm running 10.6.6, but the same version of "file" and don't see an issue.
Try:
> file -l | grep ID3
and:
> file -l | grep MPEG
I se
Bumping the version back to version 5.04 (r75061) fixes this problem.
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Andrew Watts wrote:
> It appears that version 5.05 of file is not recognizing MP3 files. On
> my mac, running 10.5.8, I get this:
>
> andrew@drbernice ~ $ file nanana.mp3
> nanana.mp3: data
> a
I've tried in the past to avoid finding out too much about how the p5
ports work, not being an avid perl user, but this situation has
motivated me to look into it a bit more.
My understanding of the current state of things is that a typical user,
after a selfupdate and port upgrade outdated, will
It appears that version 5.05 of file is not recognizing MP3 files. On
my mac, running 10.5.8, I get this:
andrew@drbernice ~ $ file nanana.mp3
nanana.mp3: data
andrew@drbernice ~ $ file --version
file-5.05
magic file from /opt/local/share/misc/magic
andrew@drbernice ~ $ md5 nanana.mp3
MD5 (nanana
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Feb 27, 2011, at 00:02, Scott Webster wrote:
>
>> So can we revbump all the affected p5 ports now? Is it all p5- ports
>> or just some of them?
>
> It was said that only the p5-* ports that compile things need to be rebuilt
> (not thos
Am 27.02.2011 um 16:44 schrieb Ryan Schmidt:
> [snip, snip, snip]
> Right, but users with problems file tickets (which I spend time sorting and
> assigning) and write to the mailing list (which I spend time reading and
> replying to), and I know you and other team members do too, so there is an
