Re: perl5, perl5.* changes

2011-03-01 Thread Erwan David
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 03:01:18AM CET, Dan Ports said: > I just revbumped all of the ports that build perl5 modules in r76604. > > So if you have been having problems, the next > `port selfupdate && port upgrade outdated` should rebuild quite a few > ports with perl 5.12 and get things working

Re: perl5, perl5.* changes

2011-03-01 Thread Dan Ports
I just revbumped all of the ports that build perl5 modules in r76604. So if you have been having problems, the next `port selfupdate && port upgrade outdated` should rebuild quite a few ports with perl 5.12 and get things working again. Dan -- Dan R. K. Ports MIT CSAIL

Re: perl5, perl5.* changes

2011-03-01 Thread Daniel J. Luke
On Mar 1, 2011, at 4:16 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > The suggestion was: when the version of perl is updated, all ports using the > perl5 portgroup should automatically have their revisions increased. I don't > know how to accomplish that using a portgroup. Well, you could do it the same way as

Re: perl5, perl5.* changes

2011-03-01 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 1, 2011, at 14:13, Daniel J. Luke wrote: > On Mar 1, 2011, at 2:28 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> > >> On Feb 28, 2011, at 20:33, Arno Hautala wrote: >> >>> This would also be a good candidate for enhancing the perl5 PortGroup. >>> Automatically "revbump" when the perl5 port is updated. Thou

Re: port upgrade outdated woes continued ... now help2man wont upgrade

2011-03-01 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 1, 2011, at 12:38, Bill Christensen wrote: > Considering the "error: perl module Locale::gettext required", is this > essentially fallout of the perl5 discussion currently going on? Presumably yes. Did you rebuild all your perl modules after upgrading perl? If not, that's the suggested r

Re: perl5 AND perl5.8 ?

2011-03-01 Thread Erwan David
Le Tue 1/03/2011, Daniel J. Luke disait > On Mar 1, 2011, at 3:05 PM, Erwan David wrote: > > > > A way to remove the build dependencies would be interesting > > port echo leaves > > could probably get you close to that... > thanks, it works -- Erwan

Re: perl5, perl5.* changes

2011-03-01 Thread Daniel J. Luke
On Mar 1, 2011, at 2:28 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Feb 28, 2011, at 20:33, Arno Hautala wrote: > >> This would also be a good candidate for enhancing the perl5 PortGroup. >> Automatically "revbump" when the perl5 port is updated. Though this >> could probably be rolled into the version depend

Re: perl5 AND perl5.8 ?

2011-03-01 Thread Daniel J. Luke
On Mar 1, 2011, at 3:05 PM, Erwan David wrote: > > A way to remove the build dependencies would be interesting port echo leaves could probably get you close to that... -- Daniel J. Luke +===

Re: perl5 AND perl5.8 ?

2011-03-01 Thread Erwan David
On 01/03/11 21:02, Scott Webster wrote: > 2011/3/1 Erwan David : >>I never explicitely installed perl, it came from dependencies. >> Today port outdated says: >> perl5 5.8.9_0 < 5.12.3_0 >> perl5.85.8.9_3 < 5.8.9_4 >> >> What should I do ? >>

Re: perl5 AND perl5.8 ?

2011-03-01 Thread Scott Webster
2011/3/1 Erwan David : >        I never explicitely installed perl, it came from dependencies. > Today port outdated says: > perl5                          5.8.9_0 < 5.12.3_0 > perl5.8                        5.8.9_3 < 5.8.9_4 > > What should I do ? > > I doubt having perl 5.8 and perl 5.12 will be

perl5 AND perl5.8 ?

2011-03-01 Thread Erwan David
I never explicitely installed perl, it came from dependencies. Today port outdated says: perl5 5.8.9_0 < 5.12.3_0 perl5.85.8.9_3 < 5.8.9_4 What should I do ? I doubt having perl 5.8 and perl 5.12 will be okay... -- Erwan _

Re: perl5, perl5.* changes

2011-03-01 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Feb 28, 2011, at 20:33, Arno Hautala wrote: > This would also be a good candidate for enhancing the perl5 PortGroup. > Automatically "revbump" when the perl5 port is updated. Though this > could probably be rolled into the version dependency work. The portgroup isn't the appropriate place to

Re: perl5, perl5.* changes

2011-03-01 Thread Dan Ports
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 05:25:12PM +0100, Rainer M?ller wrote: > Not an objection per se, but as this has been discussed on > macports-users only, I am explicitly adding Eric and Marcus as current > maintainers of perl5 to CC to this post. Thanks -- I missed that this was going only to macports-us

Re: port upgrade outdated woes continued ... now help2man wont upgrade

2011-03-01 Thread Bill Christensen
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 2:02 AM, Andrea D'Amore wrote: > On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 5:09 AM, Gregory Dodwell > wrote: > > port contents p5-locale-gettext > > Port p5-locale-gettext contains: > > /opt/local/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.9/darwin-2level/Locale/gettext.pm > > > /opt/local/bin/perl <<< 'f

Re: perl5, perl5.* changes

2011-03-01 Thread Eric Hall
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 11:09:19AM -0500, Arno Hautala wrote: > On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 10:45, Dan Ports wrote: > > > > If no one objects, I'll do exactly this today. > > One, slight, objection. > > In the interest of not having to revbump twice, are we ready to fully > migrate to 5.12? > I've se

Re: perl5, perl5.* changes

2011-03-01 Thread Rainer Müller
On 2011-03-01 16:45 , Dan Ports wrote: > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 04:34:22PM -0800, Dan Ports wrote: >> I see this as a high-priority issue that affects many people. So if we >> can get things closer to working by revbumping a bunch of ports, we >> should do that ASAP. Is there any reason *not* to r

Re: perl5, perl5.* changes

2011-03-01 Thread Arno Hautala
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 10:45, Dan Ports wrote: > > If no one objects, I'll do exactly this today. One, slight, objection. In the interest of not having to revbump twice, are we ready to fully migrate to 5.12? I've seen several votes for dropping the multiple perl versions and just following the

Re: perl5, perl5.* changes

2011-03-01 Thread Dan Ports
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 04:34:22PM -0800, Dan Ports wrote: > I see this as a high-priority issue that affects many people. So if we > can get things closer to working by revbumping a bunch of ports, we > should do that ASAP. Is there any reason *not* to revbump p5-* (or more > precisely anything us

Re: file not recognizing MP3 files?

2011-03-01 Thread Andrew Watts
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 5:05 AM, Rainer Müller wrote: > On 2011-03-01 03:47 , Arno Hautala wrote: >> and annoyingly: >>> $ /opt/local/bin/file /usr/bin/file /opt/local/bin/file >>> /usr/bin/file:       Mach-O fat file with 2 architectures >>> /opt/local/bin/file: Mach-O fat file with 2 architecture

Re: file not recognizing MP3 files?

2011-03-01 Thread Andrew Watts
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 4:51 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > On Feb 28, 2011, at 18:22, Andrew Watts wrote: > >> It appears that version 5.05 of file is not recognizing MP3 files.  On >> my mac, running 10.5.8, I get this: >> >> andrew@drbernice ~ $ file nanana.mp3 >> nanana.mp3: data > > Looks like this

Re: perl5, perl5.* changes

2011-03-01 Thread Martin Krischik
Am 01.03.11 03:33, schrieb Arno Hautala: > I say drop the version options, make perl5 install 5.12, and any newer > version in the future, and then revbump all the p5- modules. +1 Martin -- Martin Krischik mailto://krisc...@users.sourceforge.net https://sourceforge.net/users/krischik __

Re: file not recognizing MP3 files?

2011-03-01 Thread Rainer Müller
On 2011-03-01 03:47 , Arno Hautala wrote: > and annoyingly: >> $ /opt/local/bin/file /usr/bin/file /opt/local/bin/file >> /usr/bin/file: Mach-O fat file with 2 architectures >> /opt/local/bin/file: Mach-O fat file with 2 architectures Interesting, I get different results: $ port -q installe

Re: file not recognizing MP3 files?

2011-03-01 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Feb 28, 2011, at 18:22, Andrew Watts wrote: > It appears that version 5.05 of file is not recognizing MP3 files. On > my mac, running 10.5.8, I get this: > > andrew@drbernice ~ $ file nanana.mp3 > nanana.mp3: data Looks like this: http://bugs.gw.com/view.php?id=114 Are you on PowerPC or I