Re: looking for older Tcl/Tk ports

On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 08:43:06PM +0200, Gustaf Neumann wrote: > From my point of view, the best solution would be a port named > tcl84. There are a few ports > (i know of scotty (dependents: moodss, moomps), [] > that still need tcl 8.4. > tclx, > otcl, > tclcl, All failed after attempting

Port for Grails needs to be updated

Hi Guys, Grails released a new version (2.0.4). But the port is still on version 2.0.3. Is there a chance to update this port? I can't create a ticket, otherwise I'd have done this. Thanks for the help. Gerardo ___ macports-users mailing list macpo

Re: php53 or php5 ?

On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: > > On Jun 7, 2012, at 1:49 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > > > > On Jun 7, 2012, at 09:48, Robson Roberto Souza Peixoto wrote: > > > >> php53/php54 ports will have pear support ? Or is better use php5 as > default ? > > > > PEAR in MacPorts i

Re: cdrtools doesn't build mkisofs

On Jun 8, 2012, at 5:55 p.m., Michael Parchet wrote: > Le 06.06.12 23:10, Ryan Schmidt a écrit : >> port logfile cdrtools > Hello, > > Sorry but I can't find this file. > > Here is my console output. > > port logfile cdrtools @3.00 > Error: Log file not found for port in > /opt/local/var/macp

Re: cdrtools doesn't build mkisofs

Le 06.06.12 23:10, Ryan Schmidt a écrit : port logfile cdrtools Hello, Sorry but I can't find this file. Here is my console output. port logfile cdrtools @3.00 Error: Log file not found for port in /opt/local/var/macports/sources/rsync.macports.org/release/ports/sysutils/cdrtools Can you

Re: libphp5.so not generated?

On Jun 8, 2012, at 11:45 AM, Watch Dog wrote: > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Bradley Giesbrecht >> wrote: >>> >>> On Jun 8, 2012, at 8:35 AM, Watch Dog wrote: On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: >

Re: libphp5.so not generated?

On Jun 8, 2012, at 11:38 AM, Brandon Allbery wrote: > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Bradley Giesbrecht > wrote: > On Jun 8, 2012, at 8:35 AM, Watch Dog wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Bradley Giesbrecht > > wrote: > >> $ port contents php53-apache2handler > >> Port php53-apache2h

Re: php53 or php5 ?

On Jun 8, 2012, at 13:35, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: > On Jun 8, 2012, at 11:01 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> What is your plan for the three PEAR ports that have dependencies on PHP >> extensions? >> >> $ grep php5- pear-*/Portfile >> pear-AWSSDKforPHP/Portfile:port:php5-cur

Re: libphp5.so not generated?

On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote: > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Bradley Giesbrecht > wrote: >> >> On Jun 8, 2012, at 8:35 AM, Watch Dog wrote: >> > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Bradley Giesbrecht >> > wrote: >> >> $ port contents php53-apache2handler >> >> Port php53

Re: looking for older Tcl/Tk ports

On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Jim Graham wrote: > I'm looking for either a version of MacPorts or someone here, with Tcl/Tk > 8.4.x (8.4.19 is the oldest) and Img 1.2.4. I compiled Tcl/Tk 8.4.19, > and everything looked fine, until I tried to use it. It complained about > Tk not being install

Re: looking for older Tcl/Tk ports

From my point of view, the best solution would be a port named tcl84. There are a few ports (i know of scotty (dependents: moodss, moomps), tclx, otcl, tclcl, swarm, mesa, sguil-client, maybe blt as well) that still need tcl 8.4. tcl 8.5 and tcl 8.4 can coexist on the system. if there is intere

Re: libphp5.so not generated?

On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: >>> If you already know where to look, this is actually helpful.  However, >>> the point has already been made that it is not exactly obvious what >>> has happened and that this is the place to look. >> >> How is this helpful? >> >> I simply

Re: libphp5.so not generated?

On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: > On Jun 8, 2012, at 8:35 AM, Watch Dog wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Bradley Giesbrecht > wrote: > >> $ port contents php53-apache2handler > >> Port php53-apache2handler contains: > >> /opt/local/apache2/conf/extra/mod_php53

Re: php53 or php5 ?

On Jun 8, 2012, at 11:01 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Jun 8, 2012, at 09:36, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: > >> On Jun 7, 2012, at 1:49 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> >>> PEAR in MacPorts is Bradley's work, so I'm leaving it up to him to figure >>> out how best to adapt PEAR to the new php53/php54

Re: libphp5.so not generated?

>> If you already know where to look, this is actually helpful. However, >> the point has already been made that it is not exactly obvious what >> has happened and that this is the place to look. > > How is this helpful? > > I simply installed php53-apache2handler and reported what I found. He

Re: libphp5.so not generated?

On Jun 8, 2012, at 8:35 AM, Watch Dog wrote: > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Bradley Giesbrecht > wrote: >> On Jun 8, 2012, at 7:42 AM, François Suter wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Sorry if this has already been asked, but I couldn't find anything. >>> >>> I have just been through re-insta

looking for older Tcl/Tk ports

I'm looking for either a version of MacPorts or someone here, with Tcl/Tk 8.4.x (8.4.19 is the oldest) and Img 1.2.4. I compiled Tcl/Tk 8.4.19, and everything looked fine, until I tried to use it. It complained about Tk not being installed correctly (by make install). Btw, I've got Mac OS X Lion

Re: php53 or php5 ?

On Jun 8, 2012, at 09:36, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: > On Jun 7, 2012, at 1:49 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> PEAR in MacPorts is Bradley's work, so I'm leaving it up to him to figure >> out how best to adapt PEAR to the new php53/php54 ports. > > All the MacPorts pear-* packages will continue to

avidemux fails to build - ticket 34803

I have just raised a ticket on avidemux failing to build. I can't find anything relevant in TRAC. Configure seems to think that the installed gcc is not 64-bit capable, although I've been building universal ports since my upgrade to Lion. There are also assorted compilation errors referring to

Re: Ruby 1.9

> rb-rubygems @1.3.7_0+ruby (active) So your gems are ruby are presumably 1.8.7 and your binary is ruby 1.9.3. $ port variants rb-rubygems rb-rubygems has the variants: [+]ruby: add Ruby 1.8.7 support * conflicts with ruby186 ruby19 ruby186: add Ruby 1.8.6 support * conflicts with

Re: Ruby 1.9

On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: > > Is gems perhaps not connected to rb19 ? > > See if they match up: > > alias ruby > which gem > alias ruby alias ruby='/opt/local/bin/ruby1.9' jaspersmbp:wpscan jasper$ which gem /opt/local/bin/gem But this does not tell me what gem I

Re: Ruby 1.9

> Is gems perhaps not connected to rb19 ? See if they match up: alias ruby which gem smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinf

Re: Ruby 1.9

I did the following: jaspersmbp:wpscan jasper$ sudo ln -s /opt/local/bin/ruby1.9 /opt/local/bin/ruby ln: /opt/local/bin/ruby: File exists did not work. So tried an alias: jaspersmbp:wpscan jasper$ alias ruby='/opt/local/bin/ruby1.9' jaspersmbp:wpscan jasper$ ruby -v ruby 1.9.3p194 (2012-04-20 r

Re: libphp5.so not generated?

On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: > On Jun 8, 2012, at 7:42 AM, François Suter wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Sorry if this has already been asked, but I couldn't find anything. >> >> I have just been through re-installing all my Macports stuff according to >> the notes in http

Re: libphp5.so not generated?

Hi Brandon and Bradley, The php53 port looks to need a little more documentation; the Apache2 stuff is no longer a variant, but a subport php53-apache2handler. Figuring this out from the php53 Portfile is a bit tricky. That worked. Thank you so much for your help. You totally saved my day.

Re: libphp5.so not generated?

On Jun 8, 2012, at 7:42 AM, François Suter wrote: > Hi all, > > Sorry if this has already been asked, but I couldn't find anything. > > I have just been through re-installing all my Macports stuff according to the > notes in https://trac.macports.org/wiki/Migration > > Amongst others, my insta

Re: libphp5.so not generated?

On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 10:42 AM, François Suter wrote: > Sorry if this has already been asked, but I couldn't find anything. > > I have just been through re-installing all my Macports stuff according to > the notes in > https://trac.macports.org/**wiki/Migration

Re: libphp5.so not generated?

On Jun 8, 2012, at 7:42 AM, François Suter wrote: > Amongst others, my installation list includes apache2 and php53. It seems > like everything went fine except that I can't find any "libphp5.so" file > anywhere in /opt/local/. Does php53-apache2handler provide what you are looking for? Rega

libphp5.so not generated?

Hi all, Sorry if this has already been asked, but I couldn't find anything. I have just been through re-installing all my Macports stuff according to the notes in https://trac.macports.org/wiki/Migration Amongst others, my installation list includes apache2 and php53. It seems like everythin

Ruby 1.9

How can I make Ruby port 1.9 default instead of ruby 1.8.7? FYI jaspersmbp:etc jasper$ ruby --version ruby 1.8.7 (2012-02-08 patchlevel 358) [i686-darwin11] port installed | grep ruby rb-rubygems @1.3.7_0+ruby (active) ruby @1.8.7-p358_0+thread_hooks (active) ruby19 @1.9.3-p194_1+doc (acti

Re: php53 or php5 ?

On Jun 7, 2012, at 1:49 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Jun 7, 2012, at 09:48, Robson Roberto Souza Peixoto wrote: > >> php53/php54 ports will have pear support ? Or is better use php5 as default ? > > PEAR in MacPorts is Bradley's work, so I'm leaving it up to him to figure out > how best to