On 1/30/13 11:16 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
It isn't an attack on you: we have a page devoted to the specific instance I'm
referencing:
http://trac.macports.org/wiki/DarwinPortsFraud
Wow. I didn't know about the Paypal solicitations!
--
Kevin Walzer
Code by Kevin
http://www.codebykevin.com
_
It isn't an attack on you: we have a page devoted to the specific instance I'm
referencing:
http://trac.macports.org/wiki/DarwinPortsFraud
Kevin Walzer wrote:
>On 1/30/13 10:57 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
>> One time funding (pay for a task) is (arguably) different than
>routinely asking for m
On 1/30/13 10:57 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
One time funding (pay for a task) is (arguably) different than routinely asking
for money. We have had trolls in the past like that, simply feeding off people.
Well, I don't think I'm a troll...for a long time PortAuthority was the
only viable GUI t
One time funding (pay for a task) is (arguably) different than routinely asking
for money. We have had trolls in the past like that, simply feeding off people.
Kevin Walzer wrote:
>On 1/30/13 10:50 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
>> Huh.
>>
>> Don't remember that one. Certainly not one that would as
On 1/30/13 10:50 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
Huh.
Don't remember that one. Certainly not one that would ask for cash.
It's been around since 2005.
Interesting that you criticize the monetary aspect of it,
however...doesn't GSOC provide, um, cash funding for the students chosen
to work on the
Huh.
Don't remember that one. Certainly not one that would ask for cash.
Kevin Walzer wrote:
>On 1/30/13 10:37 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
>> It is routinely a GSoC project, and since we were not chosen last
>year it has definitely fallen behind.
>>
>>> >BTW, does Macports have a nice safe GUI?
On 1/30/13 10:37 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
It is routinely a GSoC project, and since we were not chosen last year it has
definitely fallen behind.
>BTW, does Macports have a nice safe GUI?
There are others...
http://www.codebykevin.com/portauthority.html
--
Kevin Walzer
Code by Kevin
http
It is routinely a GSoC project, and since we were not chosen last year it has
definitely fallen behind.
>BTW, does Macports have a nice safe GUI?
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/l
On 31/01/2013, at 1:11 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 8:52 PM, Ian Wadham wrote:
> If you stay within that, you cannot affect any files in other folders, even
> if they
> are owned by you.
>
> Not entirely true; do you know about ".."? "~" / "$HOME"? Random scripts
> ver
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 8:52 PM, Ian Wadham wrote:
> If you stay within that, you cannot affect any files in other folders,
> even if they
> are owned by you.
>
Not entirely true; do you know about ".."? "~" / "$HOME"? Random scripts
very well might.
--
brandon s allbery kf8nh
On 31/01/2013, at 6:36 AM, Brandon Allbery wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Eneko Gotzon Ares
> wrote:
> To execute powerful commands (for MacPorts) in Terminal, can cause negative
> side effects? (disturb the drivers of smart card readers, the display
> adjustment, etc…).
You have no
On Jan 30, 2013, at 13:49, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
>> That is exactly what I am thinking of; such actions are present as scripts
>> in the archive, are they not? I'm thinking that they can be inspected
>> before installing.
>
> I know a copy of the portfile is kept in the registry and it is ac
On Jan 30, 2013, at 15:50, Jerry wrote:
> On Jan 30, 2013, at 3:04 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>
>> Please try to add "-F/opt/local/Frameworks" to CFLAGS
>> (CXXFLAGS/ObjCFLAGS/FFLAGS/FCFLAGS) and LDFLAGS in addition to
>> "-framework AquaTerm" and report whether it works. I don't have any
>> good
On Jan 30, 2013, at 3:04 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Jerry wrote:
>> I recently deleted my AquaTerm version that was installed by the AquaTerm
>> installer which had put a framework in /Library/Applications/Frameworks as
>> well as things in other places. I thi
might also check things like CPU temperature etc.
If MacPorts is building from source instead of downloading prebuilt
archives, it may be pushing some marginal component too close to the edge.
(Electronic components do age and fail, and can sometimes be defective in
ways that only show at the
> That is exactly what I am thinking of; such actions are present as scripts in
> the archive, are they not? I'm thinking that they can be inspected before
> installing.
I know a copy of the portfile is kept in the registry and it is actually used
for deactivate/uninstall.
The copy in the arc
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
> > (Hm, do we have a paranoid mode where it makes an archive but doesn't
> install it automatically, so one can inspect the archive before activating
> it?)
>
> Likely either `port destroot` or `port archive` to inspect what will be
> insta
> (Hm, do we have a paranoid mode where it makes an archive but doesn't install
> it automatically, so one can inspect the archive before activating it?)
Likely either `port destroot` or `port archive` to inspect what will be
installed. Keep in mind, however, that a Portfile might dictate things
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Eneko Gotzon Ares wrote:
> To execute powerful commands (for MacPorts) in Terminal, can cause
> negative side effects? (disturb the drivers of smart card readers, the
> display adjustment, etc…).
>
All's fair for root --- this is why MacPorts uses sandboxing and d
Hello everyone :)
To execute powerful commands (for MacPorts) in Terminal, can cause
negative side effects? (disturb the drivers of smart card readers, the
display adjustment, etc…).
Recently my –loved– computer has started suffering some little such
kind of problems for which I find no e
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Jerry wrote:
> I recently deleted my AquaTerm version that was installed by the AquaTerm
> installer which had put a framework in /Library/Applications/Frameworks as
> well as things in other places. I think there might have been a link from the
> framework to s
I recently deleted my AquaTerm version that was installed by the AquaTerm
installer which had put a framework in /Library/Applications/Frameworks as well
as things in other places. I think there might have been a link from the
framework to somewhere in /usr/bin but I don't recall exactly.
Now,
22 matches
Mail list logo
