On Aug 9, 2013, at 13:17, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> On Aug 9, 2013, at 4:12 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> On Aug 9, 2013, at 15:06, "Brian D. McGrew" wrote:
>>> Well I had to port install gcc48 to build gcc-4.8.1 from source. Using
>>> /usrŠgcc didn't get me there. So installing port gcc48, build
Your use of gcc-4.8 in the working case is a red haring. That is unrelated.
--Jeremy
On Aug 9, 2013, at 13:47, Watson Ladd wrote:
> Would mp-gcc-4.7 work as the start rather than 4.8?
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 4:30 PM, David Barto wrote:
>
>> Can I get Brian and me on the open bug ticke
On Aug 9, 2013, at 15:47, Watson Ladd wrote:
> Would mp-gcc-4.7 work as the start rather than 4.8?
Given the subject of this thread, I thought gcc47 was also affected.
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.ma
Would mp-gcc-4.7 work as the start rather than 4.8?
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 4:30 PM, David Barto wrote:
> Can I get Brian and me on the open bug ticket as cc members?
>
> David
>
> On Aug 9, 2013, at 1:24 PM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia <
> jerem...@macports.org>
> wrote:
>
> > We don't r
Can I get Brian and me on the open bug ticket as cc members?
David
On Aug 9, 2013, at 1:24 PM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
wrote:
> We don't really need to continue this thread. I have reproduced the issue
> and think I have a workaround. Feel free to file a ticket and assign it to
>
We don't really need to continue this thread. I have reproduced the issue and
think I have a workaround. Feel free to file a ticket and assign it to me if
you want to continue this thread in a more appropriate venue (mailing list
chatter gets lost more easily than bug reports).
Thanks,
Jeremy
On Aug 9, 2013, at 4:12 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Aug 9, 2013, at 15:06, "Brian D. McGrew" wrote:
>> Well I had to port install gcc48 to build gcc-4.8.1 from source. Using
>> /usrŠgcc didn't get me there. So installing port gcc48, building
>> gcc-4.8.1 from source in ~ and installing over th
On Aug 9, 2013, at 15:06, "Brian D. McGrew" wrote:
> Well I had to port install gcc48 to build gcc-4.8.1 from source. Using
> /usrŠgcc didn't get me there. So installing port gcc48, building
> gcc-4.8.1 from source in ~ and installing over the top of port installed
> gcc worked (backing up /op
Well I had to port install gcc48 to build gcc-4.8.1 from source. Using
/usrŠgcc didn't get me there. So installing port gcc48, building
gcc-4.8.1 from source in ~ and installing over the top of port installed
gcc worked (backing up /opt/local of course). Circular for sure, but
effective.
I did
On Aug 9, 2013, at 14:36, Brian D. McGrew wrote:
> In case anyone is interested, you the following to build gcc-4.8.1 from
> source using gcc-mp-48:
>
> CC=/opt/local/bin/gcc-mp-4.8 CXX=/opt/local/bin/g++-mp-4.8 ../configure
> --prefix=/opt/local --build=x86_64-apple-darwin12
> --enable-languag
In case anyone is interested, you the following to build gcc-4.8.1 from
source using gcc-mp-48:
CC=/opt/local/bin/gcc-mp-4.8 CXX=/opt/local/bin/g++-mp-4.8 ../configure
--prefix=/opt/local --build=x86_64-apple-darwin12
--enable-languages=c,c++,objc,obj-c++,lot,fortran,java
--libdir=/opt/local/lib/g
On Aug 9, 2013, at 12:08PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Aug 9, 2013, at 14:00, Sterling Smith wrote:
>
>> I am looking for a port that provides python bindings for gconf (i.e. >>>
>> import gconf). Does it exist?
>
> Based on what I see when I "port search gconf", I don't think so.
>
> But i
On Aug 9, 2013, at 14:00, Sterling Smith wrote:
> I am looking for a port that provides python bindings for gconf (i.e. >>>
> import gconf). Does it exist?
Based on what I see when I "port search gconf", I don't think so.
But if python bindings exist for gconf, then you could create a port fo
List,
I am looking for a port that provides python bindings for gconf (i.e. >>>
import gconf). Does it exist?
Thanks,
Sterling
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-u
He converted people to MacPorts because we have what Homebrew does not (that,
and, you know, being a package manager).
> Please enlighten, convert people to what and why?
>
>> :) Not much, if any. But the reverse is constantly true. LaTeX is the one
>> that got me to convert people in the CS de
So why does building the code from scratch with the --enable-libstdcxx-threads
flag work, and not when using the port or when the port file configuration adds
that option?
Jeremy has shown that the MP version does not work for std::call_once, and
gcc.org has results showing that it works fine w
On Aug 9, 2013, at 8:23, Brian D. McGrew wrote:
> One more questionŠ you know a lot more about port than I so I have a no
> reason to doubt when you say it's on by default. But in the port
> installed versions when I do a gcc-mp -v, I do not see
> --enable-libstdcxx-threads in the configured l
One more questionŠ you know a lot more about port than I so I have a no
reason to doubt when you say it's on by default. But in the port
installed versions when I do a gcc-mp -v, I do not see
--enable-libstdcxx-threads in the configured line. When I do the same on
my hand cranked version, I do s
Appreciate the help!
In the meantime, I'Ll keep my original /opt/local tarred up and saved and
use my hand cranked gcc, as it seems to work just fine. It's just an
out-of-tree build as you said.
-b
On 8/9/13 8:17 AM, "Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia"
wrote:
>
>On Aug 9, 2013, at 6:27, Brian D. Mc
On Aug 9, 2013, at 6:27, Brian D. McGrew wrote:
> Well I could be going in the wrong direction, I'm not the foremost expert
> on ports yet, but what I do know is this:
>
> If I port edit gcc48 and add --enable-libstdcxx-threads and then port
> install -s gcc48, when I run gcc -v I do see the op
Please enlighten, convert people to what and why?
Regards,
Bradley Giesbrecht (pixilla)
On Aug 9, 2013, at 6:32 AM, Mark Anderson wrote:
> :) Not much, if any. But the reverse is constantly true. LaTeX is the one
> that got me to convert people in the CS department.
>
> —Mark
> __
:) Not much, if any. But the reverse is constantly true. LaTeX is the one
that got me to convert people in the CS department.
—Mark
___
Mark E. Anderson
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 7:08 AM, Chris Jones wrote:
>
> Create a homebrew port of awesome.
>>
>> That way, not only will
Well I could be going in the wrong direction, I'm not the foremost expert
on ports yet, but what I do know is this:
If I port edit gcc48 and add --enable-libstdcxx-threads and then port
install -s gcc48, when I run gcc -v I do see the option that I just added.
No question, the option IS there. Bu
Create a homebrew port of awesome.
That way, not only will you get what you wanted,
but everyone will benefit from the fruits of your labor.
... or take the more enlightened route and switch to using exclusively
MacPorts ;) Is there anything Homebrew has than MP doesn't ?
24 matches
Mail list logo
