On Tuesday March 04 2014 18:36:51 MacPorts wrote:
--+---
Comment (by devans@…):
+asm marked conflicts +universal in r117592 for now.
some questions:
- any idea/estimation on the performance gains the +asm variant allows
- I'm not at my Mac, but
On Mar 5, 2014, at 02:07, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
- If it is (and I realise this may seem overly kludgy), would it be possible
(for now ;) ) to drop +asm in the 32bit build of +asm+universal (which would
just introduce another performance loss for 32bit compared to 64 bit)? I
think
Hello.
Sorry if this is a known problem. Been Googling for hours now and searching
the archive up to 6-7 months back to no avail.
I would like to know if someone else has a problem with Macports and the
IconServicesAgent process.
I have a com.apple.IconServicesAgent process running as the
What system are you running on? I do not have that daemon on my system...
Anyway, to deal with unkillable daemons, you usually have to mess with
launchd via launchctl, but I am not sure how you would do that for the
macports user, seeing as it is a no login user as you mentioned...
On Wed, Mar
Hi,
I've seen this myself, once or twice. If you search the web for
com.apple.IconServicesAgent you will find plenty of reports. For instance
http://kieranhealy.org/blog/archives/2014/01/07/an-issue-in-mavericks-with-com-dot-apple-dot-iconservicesagent/
It is seemingly more a glitch in OSX
Hello.
Thank you to you both for your comments.
Eric : I am running on OSX 10.9.2. I don’t know what to answer about the
deamons. I have not done anything with that.
Chris : I have seen this post. Thus my comment about the temporary folders. I
have rebooted without deleting any folder
Hi,
On 5 Mar 2014, at 05:56 pm, Ghyslain Leclerc ghlecl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello.
Thank you to you both for your comments.
Eric : I am running on OSX 10.9.2. I don’t know what to answer about the
deamons. I have not done anything with that.
Chris : I have seen this post.
Hi again,
I use a non administrator user for day to day things, so I could not see the
main system log. That was the reason I did not find it when I went looking the
first time. Knowing what to look for, I realized I did not have the admin
rights. Sorry.
Went into Console, found the
On Mar 4, 2014, at 17:33 , Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.org wrote:
On Mar 4, 2014, at 18:05, Jean-François Caron wrote:
Hi, I finally caved in and upgraded to 10.9 from 10.7 in order to get
reasonable C++11 support. One of the not-unexpected side-effects is random
other problems
On Mar 5, 2014, at 15:13, Jean-François Caron wrote:
On Mar 4, 2014, at 17:33 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Mar 4, 2014, at 18:05, Jean-François Caron wrote:
Hi, I finally caved in and upgraded to 10.9 from 10.7 in order to get
reasonable C++11 support. One of the not-unexpected
On Mar 5, 2014, at 18:19 , Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.org wrote:
otool -L /opt/local/lib/lib{boost_regex-mt,source-highlight.4}.dylib
Here is the output of those commands:
port -v installed boost source-highlight
The following ports are currently installed:
boost
On Mar 5, 2014, at 20:33, Jean-François Caron wrote:
On Mar 5, 2014, at 18:19 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
otool -L /opt/local/lib/lib{boost_regex-mt,source-highlight.4}.dylib
Here is the output of those commands:
port -v installed boost source-highlight
The following ports are currently
On Mar 5, 2014, at 21:12, Jean-François Caron wrote:
On Mar 5, 2014, at 18:38 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Mar 5, 2014, at 20:33, Jean-François Caron wrote:
On Mar 5, 2014, at 18:19 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
otool -L /opt/local/lib/lib{boost_regex-mt,source-highlight.4}.dylib
Here is the
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:31 PM, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.orgwrote:
Recording and restoring only requested ports sounds perfectly reasonable.
I’m not sure why the instructions don’t say to do that. Please give it a
try if you can! If it fails, you can always start over with the full
14 matches
Mail list logo
