On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:31 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> Recording and restoring only requested ports sounds perfectly reasonable.
> I’m not sure why the instructions don’t say to do that. Please give it a
> try if you can! If it fails, you can always start over with the full
> reinstall list.
>
Fo
On Mar 5, 2014, at 21:12, Jean-François Caron wrote:
> On Mar 5, 2014, at 18:38 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> On Mar 5, 2014, at 20:33, Jean-François Caron wrote:
>>
>>> On Mar 5, 2014, at 18:19 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>>
otool -L /opt/local/lib/lib{boost_regex-mt,source-highlight.4}.dylib
>>>
On Mar 5, 2014, at 20:33, Jean-François Caron wrote:
> On Mar 5, 2014, at 18:19 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> otool -L /opt/local/lib/lib{boost_regex-mt,source-highlight.4}.dylib
>
> Here is the output of those commands:
>
> port -v installed boost source-highlight
> The following ports are curre
On Mar 5, 2014, at 18:19 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> otool -L /opt/local/lib/lib{boost_regex-mt,source-highlight.4}.dylib
Here is the output of those commands:
port -v installed boost source-highlight
The following ports are currently installed:
boost @1.55.0_1+clang32+no_single+no_static+python
On Mar 5, 2014, at 15:13, Jean-François Caron wrote:
> On Mar 4, 2014, at 17:33 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> On Mar 4, 2014, at 18:05, Jean-François Caron wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, I finally caved in and upgraded to 10.9 from 10.7 in order to get
>>> reasonable C++11 support. One of the not-unexpected
On Mar 4, 2014, at 17:33 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Mar 4, 2014, at 18:05, Jean-François Caron wrote:
>
>> Hi, I finally caved in and upgraded to 10.9 from 10.7 in order to get
>> reasonable C++11 support. One of the not-unexpected side-effects is random
>> other problems coming up because
Hi again,
I use a non administrator user for day to day things, so I could not see the
main system log. That was the reason I did not find it when I went looking the
first time. Knowing what to look for, I realized I did not have the admin
rights. Sorry.
Went into Console, found the proble
Hi,
> On 5 Mar 2014, at 05:56 pm, Ghyslain Leclerc wrote:
>
>
> Hello.
>
> Thank you to you both for your comments.
>
> Eric : I am running on OSX 10.9.2. I don’t know what to answer about the
> deamons. I have not done anything with that.
>
> Chris : I have seen this post. Thus my comm
Hello.
Thank you to you both for your comments.
Eric : I am running on OSX 10.9.2. I don’t know what to answer about the
deamons. I have not done anything with that.
Chris : I have seen this post. Thus my comment about the temporary folders. I
have rebooted without deleting any folder an
On Mar 05, 2014, at 09:55, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> environment variables to build each architecture, if desired. It is not
> possible to specify different variants for each architecture; variants apply
> to the port as a whole.
But I presume it would be possible to have architecture-specific o
Hi,
I've seen this myself, once or twice. If you search the web for
com.apple.IconServicesAgent you will find plenty of reports. For instance
http://kieranhealy.org/blog/archives/2014/01/07/an-issue-in-mavericks-with-com-dot-apple-dot-iconservicesagent/
It is seemingly more a glitch in OSX 10
What system are you running on? I do not have that daemon on my system...
Anyway, to deal with unkillable daemons, you usually have to mess with
launchd via launchctl, but I am not sure how you would do that for the
macports user, seeing as it is a "no login" user as you mentioned...
On Wed, Mar
Hello.
Sorry if this is a known problem. Been Googling for hours now and searching
the archive up to 6-7 months back to no avail.
I would like to know if someone else has a problem with Macports and the
IconServicesAgent process.
I have a com.apple.IconServicesAgent process running as the ma
On Mar 5, 2014, at 02:07, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> - If it is (and I realise this may seem overly kludgy), would it be possible
> (for now ;) ) to drop +asm in the 32bit build of +asm+universal (which would
> just introduce another performance loss for 32bit compared to 64 bit)? I
> think ffm
On Tuesday March 04 2014 18:36:51 MacPorts wrote:
> --+---
>
> Comment (by devans@…):
>
> +asm marked conflicts +universal in r117592 for now.
some questions:
- any idea/estimation on the performance gains the +asm variant allows
- I'm not at my Mac,
15 matches
Mail list logo