Hello,
Since I discovered that clang can act as a cross-compiler (generating foreign
object, .o , files), I have a renewed interest in distcc. I'm doing rather
large builds on a Linux box, and the distcc I have on there is capable of a
so-called pump mode in which the precompile step is also
On Mar 25, 2014, at 03:16, René J.V. Bertin rjvber...@gmail.com wrote:
Since I discovered that clang can act as a cross-compiler (generating
foreign object, .o , files), I have a renewed interest in distcc. I'm doing
rather large builds on a Linux box, and the distcc I have on there is
On Mar 25, 2014, at 10:03, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
The distcc port has no maintainer; nobody is looking after its interests. If
we need to make a change to the port, please file a ticket to let us know,
ideally supplying a unified diff of the needed changes. The port currently
doesn’t seem to
On Mar 25, 2014, at 10:03, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
The distcc port has no maintainer; nobody is looking after its interests. If
we need to make a change to the port, please file a ticket to let us know,
ideally supplying a unified diff of the needed changes. The port currently
doesn’t seem
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 8:44 AM, Nicolas Pavillon
pavillon.nico...@gmail.com wrote:
How come Linux distributions can provide binary packages for kdepim?
I am not sure about that. The thing is that most of openssl use from KDE
is swept under the carpet by avoiding any standard linking (only
ok. my 2 cents after quick reading this long thread
- clearly, submission should be asked on install of macports, either opt-in
or opt-out. I'm pretty sure It's a legal constraint in some places (like
european union). w opt-in, there is a risk to have little people but it's
probably cleaner.
It
