Re: libgcc update ... to 4.9?

On Aug 20, 2014, at 7:00 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote: > It built libgcc from source, without even checking for an archive. I do not > force source builds or use nonstandard prefixes, and in fact I do get many > things from archives. This makes me think license or etc. may be incorrect, > or at l

Re: libgcc update ... to 4.9?

On Aug 21, 2014, at 02:00, Brandon Allbery wrote: > So, for what it's worth, just did a selfupdate and upgrade outated. > > It built libgcc from source, without even checking for an archive. I do not > force source builds or use nonstandard prefixes, and in fact I do get many > things from arc

Re: libgcc update ... to 4.9?

On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Aug 20, 2014, at 4:05 AM, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > > > In fact, is there a way to get those installed manually, should `port` > not pick them up for whatever reason? For ports that take as long to build > as gcc or libgcc, replacing the

Re: libgcc update ... to 4.9?

On Aug 20, 2014, at 4:05 AM, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > In fact, is there a way to get those installed manually, should `port` not > pick them up for whatever reason? For ports that take as long to build as gcc > or libgcc, replacing the build time with a bit of terminal exercise is still > an

Re: Undo universal?

On Aug 20, 2014, at 12:22 PM, Joshua Root wrote: >> I had OpenSceneGraph installed, but, for another application I was testing, >> I needed a universal version. So, I did >> sudo port install OpenSceneGraph +universal >> It then proceeded to upgrade MANY things to universal. I hadn’t realiz

Re: Undo universal?

On 2014-8-21 03:54 , Brandon Allbery wrote: > On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Joshua Root > wrote: > > >> What about: > >> > >> sudo port upgrade --enforce-variants OpenSceneGraph -universal > >> > >> - Josh > >> > > > > I believe that wo

Re: libgcc update ... to 4.9? (and of binary packages and MacPorts install locations)

Hi, > > Is it possible that with the latest selfupdate, changes were included to > > the sandboxing mechanism that further interfere with the > > possibility/transparence of having /opt/local be a symlink to MacPort's > > true location? > > I'm not sure. You'd have to ask Cal. No. In fact, a rec

Re: libgcc update ... to 4.9? (and of binary packages and MacPorts install locations)

On Aug 20, 2014, at 5:02 AM, René J.V. Bertin wrote: >>> Would it at least be possible to provide a binary port for libgcc, to avoid >>> having to build (a large part of) 2 gcc versions? >> >> There already are binary archives, at least for Intel 64. >> >> http://packages.macports.org/libgcc/

Re: Undo universal?

On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Joshua Root wrote: > >> What about: > >> > >> sudo port upgrade --enforce-variants OpenSceneGraph -universal > >> > >> - Josh > >> > > > > I believe that would just change OpenSceneGraph, not the 35 or so > dependents. Can anyone verify? > > Upgrade is a recursiv

Re: Undo universal?

On 2014-8-21 03:28 , Adam Dershowitz Ph.D., P.E. wrote: > > > On Aug 20, 2014, at 1:22 PM, Joshua Root wrote: > >>> I had OpenSceneGraph installed, but, for another application I was testing, >>> I needed a universal version. So, I did >>> sudo port install OpenSceneGraph +universal >>> It

Re: Undo universal?

On Aug 20, 2014, at 1:22 PM, Joshua Root wrote: >> I had OpenSceneGraph installed, but, for another application I was testing, >> I needed a universal version. So, I did >> sudo port install OpenSceneGraph +universal >> It then proceeded to upgrade MANY things to universal. I hadn’t reali

Use proxy only on one network

> I'm experimenting with running a proxy server on my network, which I would > like MacPorts to use while on that network, while not interfering with my > ability to use MacPorts while connected to other networks. What's the best > way to do this in an automated way? Editing macports.conf proxy

Undo universal?

> I had OpenSceneGraph installed, but, for another application I was testing, I > needed a universal version. So, I did > sudo port install OpenSceneGraph +universal > It then proceeded to upgrade MANY things to universal. I hadn’t realized how > many dependencies there were. > My question i

Re: libgcc update ... to 4.9? (and of binary packages and MacPorts install locations)

On Aug 20, 2014, at 5:02 AM, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > > Is it possible that with the latest selfupdate, changes were included to the > sandboxing mechanism that further interfere with the possibility/transparence > of having /opt/local be a symlink to MacPort's true location? I have a MacPor

Re: Use proxy only on one network

On Aug 19, 2014, at 8:16 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > I'm experimenting with running a proxy server on my network, which I would > like MacPorts to use while on that network, while not interfering with my > ability to use MacPorts while connected to other networks. What's the best > way to do t

Re: virt-manager

Hello, Many thanks for all answers. Now I know how to add a local port even if virt-manager is not working. For information virt-manager is useful to manage (with a GUI) xen or kvm virtual machines (through libvirt). As proposed I'll try to do it through command line or remotely on a lin

Re: cmus and ffmpeg help

Hi, the cmus port does not have an ffmpeg variant, which is why the command you tried to run below did not change anything (port silently ignores non-existing variants) > port variants cmus cmus has the variants: aac: Support aac files flac: Support flac files mikmod: Support mod fi

Re: virt-manager

Hi, > I would like to use virt-manager with my mac. > > Currently it is not provided by macports but it seems > (http://marc.info/?l=macports-changes&m=136027005015598&w=2) that someone > tried to do it. > > Is it relevant to expect such port in the future ? Correct, I tried to port virt-manage

Re: virt-manager

On 20 Aug 2014, at 10:56, frédéric dubois wrote: > Dear all, > > I would like to use virt-manager with my mac. > > Currently it is not provided by macports but it seems > (http://marc.info/?l=macports-changes&m=136027005015598&w=2) that someone > tried to do it. > > Is it relevant to expe

cmus and ffmpeg help

Hi folks, I recently installed cmus and I found that my aiff files don't show up in my library. I read through the documentation and realised that I need ffmpeg installed too. I have tried using the command: sudo port install cmus +ffmpeg which does not install the ffmpeg for me. I have tried

virt-manager

Dear all, I would like to use virt-manager with my mac. Currently it is not provided by macports but it seems (http://marc.info/?l=macports-changes&m=136027005015598&w=2) that someone tried to do it. Is it relevant to expect such port in the future ? By the way does any body know any alt