On Nov 17, 2014, at 4:52 PM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> On Monday November 17 2014 13:33:58 Michael Crawford wrote:
>
>> I don't think shared folders are implemented as network shares, some
>> other method is used.
>
> Not explicitly, but in some implicit sense. I know that shared folders are
On Nov 17, 2014, at 3:33 PM, Michael Crawford wrote:
> VirtualBox' doc specifically warns that a guest might not run on a
> later CPU model than Apple tested it with during development. I still
> find that surprising, as all the CPU vendors work really, really hard
> to enable upward compatibili
On 17 Nov 2014, at 23:56 , René J.V. Bertin wrote:
>> FUS? What’s that?
> Fast User Switch
Oh, I’ll check that. Wondering whether that will help...
> ‘night!
Dito.
:)
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.
On Monday November 17 2014 23:42:03 Marko Käning wrote:
> FUS? What’s that?
Fast User Switch
'night!
R.
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Hi René,
On 17 Nov 2014, at 23:37 , René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> Have you tried using FUS to go to the login screen?
FUS? What’s that?
Greets,
Marko
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman
On Monday November 17 2014 23:14:24 Marko Käning wrote:
> 1) Sometimes a mouse click into the guest window catches some mouse-keyboard
> feature which causes a text selection in an open bash window. Moving the
> mouse around just selects the pointed to text range. There’s no way out of
> it,
Hi Michael,
On 17 Nov 2014, at 22:59 , Michael Crawford wrote:
> I don't recall what the actual panic message was, I'll give it a try
> again sometime soon.
this kernel panic is exactly the issue I was running into as well at the time
on my i7-iMac. :-/
> I used to use Parallels quite a bit -
If as you speculate, xnu is panicking just because it sees an
unexpected CPU class, I wonder if one could write a guest extension
that would prevent that from happening.
While Mac OS X kernel extensions are mostly used for device drivers,
they can be used to "hot patch" any part of the kernel you
On Monday November 17 2014 13:33:58 Michael Crawford wrote:
> I don't think shared folders are implemented as network shares, some
> other method is used.
Not explicitly, but in some implicit sense. I know that shared folders are
treated that way in Windows guests running in VirtualBox.
> I wa
I'm running OS X 10.5 Server, 10.6 Server, 10.7 and 10.8 in VMWare Fusion. Been
doing that since running OS X 10.7 as host and am now at 10.10.
You can download Fusion and trial it before paying and get an unlock code
(AFAIR you need to register to receive the trial unlock code).
I'm using Fusi
I don't think shared folders are implemented as network shares, some
other method is used. However if you do export a host folder as a
share, your guest should be able to mount it.
I was about to say that the folder is made to look like a regular disk
drive but I'm not so sure, that would require
Hello,
Yosemite (10.10) deprecated utmp i flavour of utmpx.
but the screen software still uses utmp.
according to the doc (pututxent) i tried a quick and dirty hack:
(getUtxEnt(line)) followed by putUtxEnt(line);
it is running, but no utmp is created.
i need it, waiting that screen will integra
Hi Michael,
eventually I had to purchase Parallels 9 because VirtualBox wouldn’t allow
to successfully run Mavericks guests on my Mavericks host running on an i7-iMac.
Parallels usually works fine if you _disable_ power saving on the guests!!
Sometimes but I experience hanging guests! Only chanc
> On Nov 17, 2014, at 10:34 AM, Artur Szostak wrote:
>
>>> I have managed to build my own MacPorts archive for some software we are
>>> want to try distribute to our Mac users. However, I wonder how one is
>>> supposed to deal with version updates to the software. The documentation is
>>> clea
On Monday November 17 2014 11:08:55 Craig Treleaven wrote:
> I tried VirtualBox without success. Parallels Desktop 9 has worked
> well for me. All I want to do is use MacPorts in the VM's to test
> building/installing/testing software (MythTV) under different OS
> versions.
What is your host
>> I have managed to build my own MacPorts archive for some software we are
>> want to try distribute to our Mac users. However, I wonder how one is
>> supposed to deal with version updates to the software. The documentation is
>> clear enough about updating the Portfiles. But how is the archive
On Nov 17, 2014, at 9:07 AM, Artur Szostak wrote:
> I have managed to build my own MacPorts archive for some software we are want
> to try distribute to our Mac users. However, I wonder how one is supposed to
> deal with version updates to the software. The documentation is clear enough
> abou
On Nov 17, 2014, at 9:08 AM, Craig Treleaven wrote:
> Parallels Desktop provides a shared folder between the host and each guest
> but I don't think that is what you are talking about.
>
> Speaking of the shared folder, I tried to point the MacPorts port tree to a
> folder on the host. SVN co
On Nov 17, 2014, at 9:20 AM, Michael wrote:
> I'd like to know what VM's are able to run OS X, and how well.
>
> First, being able to run 10.6 as a guest -- it's my understanding that this
> was technically possible, but restricted by the license, and the main VM's
> check for and refuse to ru
At 7:20 AM -0800 11/17/14, Michael wrote:
I'd like to know what VM's are able to run OS X, and how well.
I tried VirtualBox without success. Parallels Desktop 9 has worked
well for me. All I want to do is use MacPorts in the VM's to test
building/installing/testing software (MythTV) under d
On Nov 17, 2014, at 7:20 AM, Michael wrote:
> I'd like to know what VM's are able to run OS X, and how well.
All the VM solutions have worked well for me, I currently use VirtualBox.
> First, being able to run 10.6 as a guest -- it's my understanding that this
> was technically possible, but
I'd like to know what VM's are able to run OS X, and how well.
First, being able to run 10.6 as a guest -- it's my understanding that this was
technically possible, but restricted by the license, and the main VM's check
for and refuse to run this. (Sniff ... PPC programs ... photoshop elements,
Dear MacPorts experts,
I have managed to build my own MacPorts archive for some software we are want
to try distribute to our Mac users. However, I wonder how one is supposed to
deal with version updates to the software. The documentation is clear enough
about updating the Portfiles. But how is
On Nov 17, 2014, at 1:18 AM, Kevin Burnett wrote:
> Hi, hope someone can help me with this… I have been trying to install Myst
> Online through MacPorts, using the mystonline-wine package.
Hi Kevin, thanks for writing; I didn't know anyone was still using my Myst
Online ports. I haven't done m
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:18 AM, Kevin Burnett wrote:
> :debug:main No nee
>
> Yes, it ends on “No nee”, and it sits on that for hours.
>
Use "port -d" so it logs the debug output to the terminal, possibly running
under script(1); the default buffering strategy for output to files is
block-based
On November 17, 2014 2:11:21 AM CET, Ryan Schmidt
wrote:
>Sounds like MacPorts is still working on doing what you asked it to do
>before (upgrade outdated ports). You could confirm in Activity Monitor
>whether a "port" process is still running. Assuming there is, you could
>wait for it to complet
26 matches
Mail list logo
