On Jan 4, 2015, at 10:57 AM, Peng Yu wrote:
> I have llvm installed through MacPorts. But I don't see the manpages.
> Are they available? Thanks.
>
> ~$ ll $(which lli)
> lrwxr-xr-x 1 root admin 25 2015-01-04 10:38:14 /opt/local/bin/lli ->
> /opt/local/bin/lli-mp-3.4
> ~$ ll $(which llc)
> lrwxr
On Sunday January 04 2015 20:18:26 Brandon Allbery wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 8:14 PM, René J.V. wrote:
>
> > #> head /etc/hosts
> > ##
> > # Host Database
> > #
> > # localhost is used to configure the loopback interface
> > # when the system is booting. Do not change this entry.
> > ##
>
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 8:14 PM, René J.V. wrote:
> #> head /etc/hosts
> ##
> # Host Database
> #
> # localhost is used to configure the loopback interface
> # when the system is booting. Do not change this entry.
> ##
>
> 127.0.0.1 localhost Portia
> 255.255.255.255 broadcasthost
> # RJVB
On Sunday January 04 2015 16:51:42 Justin C. Walker wrote:
> > (It is *not*, however, in /Hosts.)
>
> Do you mean that "localhost" is not mentioned in /etc/hosts? I can't verify
> that one way or another since my 10.10 system is an upgrade from several
> versions back.
My 10.9.5 is an upgrade
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
> Do you mean that "localhost" is not mentioned in /etc/hosts? I can't
> verify that one way or another since my 10.10 system is an upgrade from
> several versions back.
>
No, I mean it is not listed in DirectoryServices under the Hosts ke
On Jan 4, 2015, at 16:31 , Brandon Allbery wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>>
>>> To answer another question from earlier in the thread, I believe the
>>> "database" used by Mac OS X during the early
On Jan 4, 2015, at 16:27 , Brandon Allbery wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>
>> To answer another question from earlier in the thread, I believe the
>> "database" used by Mac OS X during the early years was a hold-over from
>> NeXT days (netinfo?). I think it w
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>
>> To answer another question from earlier in the thread, I believe the
>> "database" used by Mac OS X during the early years was a hold-over from
>> NeXT days (netinfo?). I think
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
> To answer another question from earlier in the thread, I believe the
> "database" used by Mac OS X during the early years was a hold-over from
> NeXT days (netinfo?). I think it was essentially gone by the time 10.6 was
> released.
>
Inc
On Jan 4, 2015, at 13:23 , René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> On Sunday January 04 2015 13:10:30 Justin C. Walker wrote:
>
>>> I have no trouble ssh-ing to localhost on my system, but Safari always
>>> responds "Can't connect to the Server."
>>
>> FWIW, i get this on my 10.6.8 system, which is more or
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 4:23 PM, René J.V. wrote:
> TWO IPv6 addresses? Could you paste the relevant lines here?
>
Looks like there's an link-local address space reference in there as well
as ::1, presumably because the loopback adapter does not implement IPv6
link-local autoconfig (why, indeed,
On Sunday January 04 2015 13:10:30 Justin C. Walker wrote:
> > I have no trouble ssh-ing to localhost on my system, but Safari always
> > responds "Can't connect to the Server."
>
> FWIW, i get this on my 10.6.8 system, which is more or less "stock".
>
> Also, 'localhost' is defined in my /etc
To add to the chatter:
On Jan 3, 2015, at 13:41 , William H. Magill wrote:
> Did Apple change something in Yosemite/Safari so that "localhost" is no
> longer an accessible DNS address for Safari?
>
> I have no trouble ssh-ing to localhost on my system, but Safari always
> responds "Can't conn
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 1:14 PM, René J.V. wrote:
> Not the server running on my modem/router (192.168.1.1) in any case. But
> it could be that router just forwards requests to the ISP's DNS servers if
> they don't match the entries in the MAC/hostname table.
It does; it's not a real nameserver,
On Sunday January 04 2015 12:28:50 Brandon Allbery wrote:
> not serve it to you, whereas a local nameserver usually would. (Roughly the
> same rule as for the RFC1918 private address ranges.)
Not the server running on my modem/router (192.168.1.1) in any case. But it
could be that router just fo
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 12:23 PM, René J.V. wrote:
> And when I out-comment the localhost definition from /etc/hosts, I can no
> longer connect to that hostname.
That's because, while a nameserver often comes with a zone definition
providing a localhost definition, publishing it is a no-no. So 8
On Sunday January 04 2015 10:46:53 Brandon Allbery wrote:
> It'll be fine once commodity Internet and commodity routers/access points
> (aside from Apple's!) includes IPv6 connectivity. Currently, you'll find
> that getting IPv6 upstream is nearly impossible in many places / with many
> providers;
I have llvm installed through MacPorts. But I don't see the manpages.
Are they available? Thanks.
~$ ll $(which lli)
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root admin 25 2015-01-04 10:38:14 /opt/local/bin/lli ->
/opt/local/bin/lli-mp-3.4
~$ ll $(which llc)
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root admin 25 2015-01-04 10:38:14 /opt/local/bin/llc -
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Michael Crawford
wrote:
> DNS is a protocol, not an API. To the extent that hosts is used, it's
> because developer of the software that implements the protocol chooses
> to use it.
>
That would be why I mentioned BSD API (used by most command line utilities)
an
DNS is a protocol, not an API. To the extent that hosts is used, it's
because developer of the software that implements the protocol chooses
to use it.
It's a PITA if it's not used - I quite commonly set up small networks
in my own office, with static IPs hardwired into my hosts files.
Michael Da
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 11:20 AM, William H. Magill wrote:
> > BIND9 at least comes with a local zone definition that includes
> "localhost." as a name, with the usual mapping. That said, people *usually*
> get it from /etc/hosts... *but* OS X is a little weird in how/when it uses
> the hosts file
> On Jan 4, 2015, at 10:46 AM, Brandon Allbery wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 10:34 AM, René J.V. wrote:
> On Sunday January 04 2015 09:05:42 Brandon Allbery wrote:
>
> >From the standpoint of DNS, "localhost" is fully qualified: it is not the
> >short form of a name that is meaningful only
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 10:34 AM, René J.V. wrote:
> On Sunday January 04 2015 09:05:42 Brandon Allbery wrote:
>
> >From the standpoint of DNS, "localhost" is fully qualified: it is not the
> >short form of a name that is meaningful only in the context of a
> particular
> >domain.
>
> AFAIK you ne
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 2:06 AM, William H. Magill wrote:
> It also appears that the function of the ServerName directive has changed.
> The current Apache manual
> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/core.html#servername
>
>
> describes its syntax as requiring a FQDN -- which neither Localhost n
24 matches
Mail list logo
