Re: openssl vs. libressl

2015-11-09 Thread Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
> On Nov 9, 2015, at 17:31, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > > On Monday November 09 2015 16:11:54 Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote: > > hi, > >>> Now what if you do >>> >>> %> ln -s libssl.35.dylib libssl.1.0.0.dylib ? >>> >>> (assuming that libressl indeed installs libssl.35.dylib) >>> >>> If tha

opendkim and Trac error

2015-11-09 Thread Terry Barnum
Pixilla was kind enough to update both the amavisd-new and opendkim ports but I ran into a problem with unbound, a dependency of opendkim. I went to look at the opendkim port on trac to see if I could figure it out or open a ticket but I see "Trac Error" when attempting to view any port. Here's

Re: openssl vs. libressl

2015-11-09 Thread Brandon Allbery
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 8:31 PM, René J.V. wrote: > First quick tests (downloading a couple of release tarballs from github, > with /opt/local/bin/curl) suggests that it works. Which doesn't really > surprise me too much: both libraries are written in C. As long as dependent > software sticks to p

Re: openssl vs. libressl

2015-11-09 Thread René J . V . Bertin
On Monday November 09 2015 16:11:54 Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote: hi, > > Now what if you do > > > > %> ln -s libssl.35.dylib libssl.1.0.0.dylib ? > > > > (assuming that libressl indeed installs libssl.35.dylib) > > > > If that works, it can be handled with a very simple post-destroot addit

Re: openssl vs. libressl

2015-11-09 Thread Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
> On Nov 9, 2015, at 13:40, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > > On Monday November 09 2015 15:27:54 Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >>> Interesting. I think it was FreeBSD that tried to do that (both API and >>> ABI) and failed at both, and said rebuild stuff for one or the other. >>> Apparently they were the

Re: openssl vs. libressl

2015-11-09 Thread Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
> On Nov 9, 2015, at 13:10, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > > On Monday November 09 2015 15:05:26 Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> In r139229 Jeremy made libressl a drop-in replacement for openssl. If a >> rebuild is needed to make things work, then this > > Yes, but at least on Linux libressl installs lib

Re: openssl vs. libressl

2015-11-09 Thread Rainer Müller
On 2015-11-09 22:40, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > Now what if you do > > %> ln -s libssl.35.dylib libssl.1.0.0.dylib ? > > (assuming that libressl indeed installs libssl.35.dylib) > > If that works, it can be handled with a very simple post-destroot addition in > both ports . You should not do th

Re: openssl vs. libressl

2015-11-09 Thread René J . V . Bertin
On Monday November 09 2015 15:27:54 Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > Interesting. I think it was FreeBSD that tried to do that (both API and > > ABI) and failed at both, and said rebuild stuff for one or the other. > > Apparently they were the ones who made the mistake, and it actually works > > if done

Re: Experiences with El Capitan

2015-11-09 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Nov 9, 2015, at 2:34 AM, Artur Szostak wrote: > Let me ask another question: Is there a seamless way to add building and > mirroring services from 3rd parties for the pre-built binaries? No. We want verified binaries built in a clean-room by known servers, not binaries built in unknown cond

Re: openssl vs. libressl

2015-11-09 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Nov 9, 2015, at 3:12 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote: > On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> In r139229 Jeremy made libressl a drop-in replacement for openssl. > > Interesting. I think it was FreeBSD that tried to do that (both API and ABI) > and failed at both, and said rebuild s

Re: openssl vs. libressl

2015-11-09 Thread Brandon Allbery
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > In r139229 Jeremy made libressl a drop-in replacement for openssl. Interesting. I think it was FreeBSD that tried to do that (both API and ABI) and failed at both, and said rebuild stuff for one or the other. Apparently they were the ones wh

Re: openssl vs. libressl

2015-11-09 Thread René J . V . Bertin
On Monday November 09 2015 15:05:26 Ryan Schmidt wrote: > In r139229 Jeremy made libressl a drop-in replacement for openssl. If a > rebuild is needed to make things work, then this Yes, but at least on Linux libressl installs libraries with different numbers (libssl.so.35 vs libssl.so.1.0.0). I

Re: openssl vs. libressl

2015-11-09 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Nov 9, 2015, at 2:43 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote: > On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 3:39 PM, René J.V. wrote: >> I understand that libressl aims to be API-compatible with openssl so that it >> can act as a drop-in replacement. How far does that go, far enough that one >> can symlink the libssl and libcr

Re: openssl vs. libressl

2015-11-09 Thread Brandon Allbery
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 3:39 PM, René J.V. wrote: > I understand that libressl aims to be API-compatible with openssl so that > it can act as a drop-in replacement. How far does that go, far enough that > one can symlink the libssl and libcrypto runtimes from the one port to the > shared libraries

openssl vs. libressl

2015-11-09 Thread René J . V . Bertin
Hi, I understand that libressl aims to be API-compatible with openssl so that it can act as a drop-in replacement. How far does that go, far enough that one can symlink the libssl and libcrypto runtimes from the one port to the shared libraries of the other, without having to rebuild dependents

Deactivating port and unused dependencies

2015-11-09 Thread Artur Szostak
Hi, I want to deactivate a port and its dependencies. Something similar to "port uninstall --follow-dependencies portname". But I do not want to uninstall anything, I just want to deactivate. How should I construct such a port command? The closest I can think of is: sudo port deactivate portna

Re: Experiences with El Capitan

2015-11-09 Thread Arno Hautala
I've been using this [1] procedure for quite a while. It could easily be adapted for widespread use by hosting the binaries and signatures somewhere publicly. And I'm not sure of the specifics, but I know there are build scripts in the repo somewhere for building all ports. A previous message [2]

RE: Experiences with El Capitan

2015-11-09 Thread Artur Szostak
Hi, Let me ask another question: Is there a seamless way to add building and mirroring services from 3rd parties for the pre-built binaries? Kind regards. Artur From: macports-users-boun...@lists.macosforge.org [macports-users-boun...@lists.macosforge.