Can't see exactly what the wget URL was I sent you this afternoon, but the
proper raw file URL is this one (as you can see from the ticket page).
https://trac.macports.org/raw-attachment/ticket/51844/qt4-SL-Libcxx-fix-revised.diff
The link listed below in your message gets you an HTML-ized ver
When something like that happens, it's best if you take a look and see.
What's it telling you -- hmm-- what could be ending in the middle of the line?
maybe your patch download file is incomplete for some reason?
$cat qt4-SL-Libcxx-fix-revised.diff
should look like this (as you can also see fro
I’ve successfully updated to Sierra on my late 2010 iMac and installed Mac
ports.
Currently waiting for the download to complete on my 2012 Mac Mini.
The re-install of Mac ports was delayed only by the inordinate amount of time
it takes to download Xcode 8!
The actual install of the Mac Ports p
Hmmm, I get:
sudo patch https://trac.macports.org/attachment/ticket/51844/qt4-SL-Libcxx-fix-revised.diff
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Hi,
Drawing some attention to some recent enhancements I've submitted to MacPorts'
port:dbus (https://trac.macports.org/ticket/52257#comment:3) in hope of
rallying some beta-testers.
I think many users who regularly work on a remote Mac using X11 for displaying
probably noticed that applicatio
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Lawrence Velázquez
wrote:
> > I recall Ryan mentioning that he was doing so.
>
> I think that was just for Python modules.
No, the one I recall was yesterday immediately after Apple released Sierra,
and specifically said he was kicking the buildbots to get Sierr
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 02:54:35PM -0400, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
> Are the build-bots building binary packages for Sierra yet,
Yes, see
https://build.macports.org/builders/ports-10.12_x86_64-watcher
> and if they aren't already there, may we be notified when they're at a
> level of complete
> On Sep 21, 2016, at 3:14 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Lawrence Velázquez
>> wrote:
>>
>> I don't believe anyone has set off a build for the express purpose of
>> creating Sierra archives, but the Sierra worker is nonetheless quite busy.
>
> I recall Ryan
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Lawrence Velázquez
wrote:
> I don't believe anyone has set off a build for the express purpose of
> creating Sierra archives, but the Sierra worker is nonetheless quite busy.
I recall Ryan mentioning that he was doing so.
--
brandon s allbery kf8nh
On 09/21/2016 08:54 PM, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
> Are the build-bots building binary packages for Sierra yet, and if they
> aren't already there, may we be notified when they're at a level of
> completeness approximating that of El Capitan builds? A migration would take
> hours less if one coul
> On Sep 21, 2016, at 2:54 PM, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
>
> Are the build-bots building binary packages for Sierra yet
I don't believe anyone has set off a build for the express purpose of creating
Sierra archives, but the Sierra worker is nonetheless quite busy.
https://build.macports.org/b
> On Sep 21, 2016, at 14:50, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
>
>> On Sep 20, 2016, at 7:53 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 7:45 PM, Arno Hautala wrote:
>>>
>>> Is an installer coming soon?
>>
>> /topic on IRC:
>> https://sourceforge.net/projects/macports/files/MacPorts/
> On Sep 20, 2016, at 7:53 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 7:45 PM, Arno Hautala wrote:
>>
>> Is an installer coming soon?
>
> /topic on IRC:
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/macports/files/MacPorts/2.3.4/MacPorts-2.3.4-10.12-Sierra.pkg/download
> - Read: https://tr
Sure! Basically, you need the diff file in the folder with the Portfile, and
then you run “patch”. Details to follow:
1. clean out any current leftovers from previous attempts
“sudo port clean qt4-mac”
2. find the existing port file for qt4-mac
$ port file qt4-mac
/opt/local/var/macports/sourc
That may sound silly, but the instructions on how to patch a port are not clear
when attempting to apply a patch to a port that hasn't been successfully
installed.
Would you point me to a clear explanation please?
El 2016-09-17, a las 21:08, Ken Cunningham escribió:
> Hi Pat,
>
> just rebuil
On Tuesday September 20 2016 18:39:24 Ken Cunningham wrote:
Hi Ken,
>> That's a Qt bug you should report if 5.4.2 is still supposed to install and
>> work on 10.7!
>
>Rene, I see I made an error there -- I just tried again to install 5.4.2 on
>10.7 and it installed. I must have been slightly mi
16 matches
Mail list logo
