On May 17, 2007, at 1:14 AM, Boey Maun Suang wrote:
Hi Chuck and David,
On 17/05/2007, at 00:14, Chuck Remes wrote:
On May 16, 2007, at 8:59 AM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
Is there a compelling reason to use cvs HEAD for this port?
Yes. The upcoming 1.1.0 release can only be accessed from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On May 16, 2007, at 8:59 AM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
On May 16, 2007, at 7:54 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I submitted a new port recently and was hoping someone could
commit it for me. Here's the ticket information:
http://trac.macports.org/proj
Looking into it a bit deeper on my own, I see that puredarwin.org is
pure vaporware. I thought I had missed out on an announcement but I
now see that there is nothing there yet.
Regardless, I wish them luck.
cr
On Apr 29, 2007, at 9:26 PM, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
I think all we know by th
On Nov 28, 2006, at 9:14 AM, Luc Heinrich wrote:
On 28 nov. 06, at 15:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That looks very odd. There shouldn't be any dependent relationship
between ruby and tk.
The Ruby Portfile has been dependent on port:tcl and port:tk since
it was updated for 1.8.5. Some of
