Le Sun 20/03/2011, Christopher Stone disait
> On Mar 19, 2011, at 17:16, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> > Let's keep the discussion on the mailing list, so all can benefit from it.
> > (Use Reply All when you reply.)
>
> __
>
> Why doesn
Le Sat 12/03/2011, Keith J. Schultz disait
>
> Am 12.03.2011 um 23:24 schrieb Ryan Schmidt:
>
> > On Mar 12, 2011, at 00:56, Keith J. Schultz wrote:
> > [snip, snip]
> >>Over here in Germany Xcode 4 only cost as much as a pack of
> >>cigarettes!
> >
> > I think the primary objection, fro
Le Thu 10/03/2011, Mark Hattam disait
> I see that Apple has released XCode4 today.
>
> When will MacPorts require that we upgrade to it ... bearing in mind that it
> isn't free?
>
And that appstore necesitates to approve licences which gives many rights to
Apple (rights to disseminate person
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 03:01:18AM CET, Dan Ports said:
> I just revbumped all of the ports that build perl5 modules in r76604.
>
> So if you have been having problems, the next
> `port selfupdate && port upgrade outdated` should rebuild quite a few
> ports with perl 5.12 and get things working
Le Tue 1/03/2011, Daniel J. Luke disait
> On Mar 1, 2011, at 3:05 PM, Erwan David wrote:
> >
> > A way to remove the build dependencies would be interesting
>
> port echo leaves
>
> could probably get you close to that...
>
On 01/03/11 21:02, Scott Webster wrote:
> 2011/3/1 Erwan David :
>>I never explicitely installed perl, it came from dependencies.
>> Today port outdated says:
>> perl5 5.8.9_0 < 5.12.3_0
>> perl5.85.8.9_3 &l
I never explicitely installed perl, it came from dependencies.
Today port outdated says:
perl5 5.8.9_0 < 5.12.3_0
perl5.85.8.9_3 < 5.8.9_4
What should I do ?
I doubt having perl 5.8 and perl 5.12 will be okay...
--
Erwan
_
Le Fri 29/10/2010, Anthony Michael Agelastos disait
> Hello,
>
> Out of curiosity, are there any plans for MacPorts to be on the upcoming Mac
> App Store? If not, does anyone think there's merit for MacPorts to utilize
> such infrastructure? I am not sure how the store will work, but I would
On 04/10/10 10:32, Michael Curtis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have just installed version 1.9.1 on my Snow Leopard machine (10.6.4)
> when I do a selfupdate I get the following errors. If this something to
> worry about?
>
> Best wishes
>
> Michael
>
> port -d selfupdate
>
> ---> Updating the ports tr
On 02/08/10 21:32, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2010-08-02 20:14:21 +0200, Erwan David wrote:
>> It keeps the problem of cairo, pango, gtk2, etc...
>> do they come because of texlive ?
>
> There's a dependency texlive -> texlive-bin-extra -> texlive-bin ->
Le Mon 2/08/2010, Vincent Lefevre disait
> On 2010-08-02 19:30:02 +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> > upgrading my ports I fnd that the upgrade of xorg-libXi wants to install
> > whole gtk, a part of texlive, etc..
>
> The reason is xmlto, which has more dependencies than
upgrading my ports I fnd that the upgrade of xorg-libXi wants to install
whole gtk, a part of texlive, etc..
Hpow can I stop this madness ?, How can I go back removing all the
dependencies it installed ?
How can I see the whole dependency tree to see why I get this ?
ANd how can I say : never in
upgrading outdated packages, I got a bug on mutt-devel
(http://trac.macports.org/ticket/25623), and preceding version does not
work anymore because of the openssl upgrade. Thus beware and wait that
this bug is closed before upgrading openssl or mutt-devel.
__
Le Mon 8/06/2009, William Davis disait
> This is off topic and I do it fyi, not expecting discussion though it
> may effect the migration rate which will effect the need for 1.8:
> Snow Leopard will cost $39 as an upgrade from Leopard -- news from
> devconf. Didnt see a release date.
>
Apple
Le Sat 9/05/2009, Jeremy Huddleston disait
>
> On May 9, 2009, at 14:05, Tony Doan wrote:
>
>> (long time lurker, first time poster)
>>
>> Got MacPorts?
>>
>> Do you normally keep things up to date by running "port sync; port
>> upgrade outdated"? Do you then wish there was a problem free way to
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 04:11:14PM CEST, Alejandro Aragon
said:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I need to free up some space and now I see that the /opt folder has
> 12.2GB used. After invoking 'sudo port installed', I see that there are
> way too many ports that are installed but not active, so I thought
When I login on trac, I get the following error :
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/opt/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/trac/web/api.py", line 367, in
send_error
'text/html')
File "/opt/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/trac/web/chrome.py", line 706,
in render_template
if n
>
> Okay, so now I'm thoroughly confused. OS X (10.5.5) reported nothing when
> I did an 'echo $MANPATH' and wouldn't show me a man page for 'port'. So, I
> added 'export MANPATH=/opt/local/share/man:$MANPATH' to my .profile and
> now at least I can view manpages from macports. Is there a proper
Le Fri 25/07/2008, Joerg van den Hoff disait
> hi,
>
> I'd like to ask whether `mutt' will be brought up to date
> in `macports' any time soon? right now I only see version 1.4.2.3
> while on the mutt home page (and in the `fink' project, too) I see
> 1.5.18 (which is quite new: may 2008).
>
use
I've got an Intel Imac and a G4 powerbook. Is it possible to build the
ports for the powerbook on the more powerful Imac ?
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macpor
Le Sun 4/11/2007, Olaf Foellinger disait
> Hi,
>
> * Sbranzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [04.11.07 14:13]wrote:
>
> > I'm experiencing some issues with the latest release of mutt-devel and
> > header caching. Basically, without changing the configuration from
> > 1.5.16, header caching for my maildirs s
I forgot : upgrading only netpbm gives the same error
/usr/bin/ld: Undefined symbols:
_pnm_xeltopixel
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
gnumake[2]: *** [pnmtopng] Error 1
gnumake[1]: *** [other/all] Error 2
gnumake: *** [converter/all] Error 2
so there is certainly a problem with the netpbm por
I type port upgrade -R libpng
then first port tries to upgrade netpbm (and fails)
port upgrade -R libpng
---> Fetching netpbm
---> Attempting to fetch netpbm-10.26.44.tgz from
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/netpbm
---> Verifying checksum(s) for netpbm
---> Extracting netpbm
---> Applying
Le Thu 4/10/2007, Ryan Schmidt disait
> On Oct 4, 2007, at 19:51, ara.t.howard wrote:
>
> > anyone had success installing portupgrade and co on osx? i'm about to give
> > it a whirl...
>
> Having never heard of "portupgrade" before, I Googled it... looks like it's
> a set of utilities for
Le Sun 2/09/2007, Rainer Müller disait
> Erwan David wrote:
> > The abcde port depends on normalize. However, the normalize port is broken
> > (source page does not exists) and seems to have no maintainer.
> >
> > What can we do for this ?
> >
The abcde port depends on normalize. However, the normalize port is broken
(source page does not exists) and seems to have no maintainer.
What can we do for this ?
(there is a normlize at http://normalize.nongnu.org/ which might be the same,
but I do not know if it is the case.)
--
E
Le Wed 2/05/2007, Elias Pipping disait
> yes there is. run 'sudo portindex foo' where foo is the path to the
> directory the Portindex is in (e.g. type 'cd `port dir bash`/../..' and run
> 'sudo portindex .' from there).
Thanks, I'll update my upgrade script for automating this.
--
Erwan
Doing a port -v sync, I knew thare had been some update on the
mutt-devel port. However port outdated did not show any change, mutt
still being in version 1.5.14
Looking at the portfile it was version 1.5.15, so I upgraded it.
It seems the PortIndex file was not up to date, is there a way
Le Mon 30/04/2007, Boey Maun Suang disait
> Hi Erwan,
>
> Try using the -n flag (don't upgrade dependencies in upgrade). I
> also use -u (uninstall non-active ports when upgrading and
> uninstalling) to get rid of old versions, along with -f to force it
> to do that when the old versions ha
Le Sun 29/04/2007, Yves de Champlain disait
>
> Le 07-04-29 à 16:06, Erwan David a écrit :
>
> >I am doing some upgrades of the installed ports, but for each port
> >libiconv
> >and gperf get recompiled and reinstalled
> >
> >For 6 or 7 ports it makes t
I am doing some upgrades of the installed ports, but for each port libiconv
and gperf get recompiled and reinstalled
For 6 or 7 ports it makes that upgrade takes more than 1 day on my PB G4.
What can I do for port to see libiconv is already the latest version and it
does not need to recompile it
31 matches
Mail list logo
