> On Dec 7, 2014, at 5:49 PM, Clemens Lang wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> - On 7 Dec, 2014, at 21:45, Marko Käning mk-macpo...@techno.ms wrote:
>
>> I didn’t imagine, that already 40% of the (contributing) users are on OSX
>> 10.10
>> and only 30% on 10.9...
>>
>> Interesting also, that 10.6 is stil
Hi,
- On 7 Dec, 2014, at 21:45, Marko Käning mk-macpo...@techno.ms wrote:
> I didn’t imagine, that already 40% of the (contributing) users are on OSX
> 10.10
> and only 30% on 10.9...
>
> Interesting also, that 10.6 is still THIRD!!! :-)
Please note that none of the graphs you see on this
On 07 Dec 2014, at 22:23 , Brandon Allbery wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Marko Käning wrote:
> Joshua, how can we advertise mpstats to more users???
>
> Message in the installer dmg (maybe even a checkbox to auto-install the
> port?) and after selfupdate to a new version?
A
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Marko Käning wrote:
> Joshua, how can we advertise mpstats to more users???
>
Message in the installer dmg (maybe even a checkbox to auto-install the
port?) and after selfupdate to a new version? The latter would even be
better as a "display notes for base
On 07 Dec 2014, at 22:07 , Joshua Root wrote:
>> Interesting also, that 10.6 is still THIRD!!! :-)
>
> Note that the sample size is only 50, and that's almost certainly
> heavily skewed towards committers.
Yes, I am aware of the limited use of the mpstats port. Still, it is interesting
that thos
On 2014-12-8 07:45 , Marko Käning wrote:
> Hi René,
>
> On 07 Dec 2014, at 21:32 , René J.V. Bertin wrote:
>> That calls for a bit of lobbying -- or maybe a survey how many MacPorts
>> users were aware of the port's existence.
>>
>> Not me in any case…
>
> well, the original thread started off
Hi René,
On 07 Dec 2014, at 21:32 , René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> That calls for a bit of lobbying -- or maybe a survey how many MacPorts users
> were aware of the port's existence.
>
> Not me in any case…
well, the original thread started off wrt Homebrew [1] and was then followed by
[2].
And y