Re: Building static version of ImageMagick (was: Re: Building static version of glib2)

2007-12-01 Thread Andrei Tchijov
Thanx again I already have tried upgrade glib2 and it did produce static libraries! It did complained a little about libiconv (just in case, I have attached all messages at the bottom of this e-mail) Andrei On Dec 1, 2007, at 15:07 , Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Dec 1, 2007, at 09:44,

Re: Building static version of ImageMagick (was: Re: Building static version of glib2)

2007-12-01 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Dec 1, 2007, at 09:44, Andrei Tchijov wrote: Thanks for quick response. While you fixing it, could you do the same with ImageMagic? It does not install any static libraries either. ImageMagick is a bit of a different case. Its default is to build static libraries, but the port